Freshwater

<html><body>
A local family moved deftly to ­secure the Freshwater home of former Manly rugby league coach Trent Barrett for $3.65m, with the deal done just six days after it hit the market.
There had been a $3.2m guide for the northern beaches home bought with his property stylist wife Kylie as he took the reins at the Sea Eagles.
The couple paid $2.41m in 2015 for the five bedroom home after moving from their ­record setting $2.4m Shellharbour home. The Barrett are renting back at Barrack Point.
The incoming Canterbury Bulldogs NRL coach, who will take over at Belmore next year, says their new ­location is a one-hour drive to Belmore. “People are finding they need more space, they want their castle,” Belle agent Matt Brady told The Manly Daily.
This article first appeared in The Sunday Telegraph
</body></html>

firstname1-iYD4UYzvBa

Trent Barrett sells Freshwater home in a week

<html><body>
The incoming Canterbury Bulldogs NRL coach Trent Barrett is preparing for his career renaissance in Sydney’s southwest.
He’s listed the northern beaches home he bought with wife Kylie when he took the reins at the Manly Sea Eagles.
The couple paid $2.41 million in 2015 for the Freshwater home upon upsizing from their ­record setting $2.4 million Shellharbour home.
It was briefly listed in late 2018 following Barrett’s controversial resignation. But now Barrett, who will take over at Belmore next year, is fixed on finding a buyer at its August 29 auction with Barrett and the family now renting back at Barrack Point.
The five bedroom home built in 2004 has bi-fold doors from a number of living areas that open to the outside where there’s a covered alfresco entertaining balcony with an elevated glass edged pool. Belle Property have a $3.2m guide.
This article was first published in the Sunday Telegraph. 
</body></html>

Trent Barrett lists Freshwater home

<html><body>
A Freshwater beachside home with ocean views has been sold for a record price. 
It has been sold for $5.495 million. 
The six bedroom, three bedroom house with a self-contained flat is situated at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-nsw-freshwater-132470190" target="_blank">57 Undercliff Road</a>.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2020/2/5/freshwater%202.jpg" alt="">
Sandro Petrini and Claudia Petrini of Belle Property Manly sold the three level property.
Set on 556 sqm of land, the home features bedrooms with built-ins, deluxe granite kitchen, and coastal style bathrooms. 
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2020/2/5/freshwater%203.jpg" alt="">
It's position is just moments away from Freshwater Reserve, award wining restaurant, local cafes and public transport. 
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Beachside Freshwater trophy home sold for a record price 

<html><body>
The Harbord Beach Hotel in Freshwater on Sydney's Northern Beaches has changed hands for the first time in 42 years.
It was bought by Northern Beaches local Glenn Piper, who said it is undoubtedly one of Sydney's greatest pubs.
"I’m so proud to be part of the Northern Beaches community and honoured to help usher this incredible venue into the next phase of its rich and colourful history," Piper said.
“Harbord Beach Hotel has always been a haven that encapsulates Freshwater’s soul and spirit”. 
“It is so much more than a pub; it is an extension of the community, informed by the surf culture that has long been embedded within the name, and we are committed to taking our time and doing it justice”. 
Piper (pictured right), who spent his career in the property industry, has teamed up with a local syndicate of local investors and fellow Northern Beaches resident Lachlan Cottee (pictured left) to buy the hotel, which is set to be refurbished once plans are in place.
They're set to refurbish the kitchen and courtyard area. The building and its facade is heritage-listed.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2020/1/8/Piper%20Harbord.jpg" alt="">
The venue was built in 1928 and sits just 100 metres from Freshwater Beach.
Leading hotelier John Thorpe and Trish King bought the property in 1978.
Sean King, son of John and Trish, who has been the general manager of the hotel for the past two decades, he is looking forward to enjoying the pub as a regular.
"My brothers, sister and I were raised in this pub and I have lived opposite for the past 25 years; it is a very special property that means so much to my family and the local community", King said.
"After meeting Glenn, we recognised that he not only has the energy and enthusiasm to bring new life to the venue, but importantly a genuine love for the area that will ensure this local pub remains a local.
"I am very much looking forward to enjoying it as a regular and watch it evolve under Glenn's care and ownership". 
Main article image picture source: Harbord Beach Hotel.
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

jrobinson-rf4aSBido9

Freshwater's Harbord Beach Hotel sells for first time in over four decades

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Australia has one of the most sophisticated water markets in the world, particularly notable for the ways in which government can return water to the environment.
Water markets allow the return of this water through two main mechanisms. The first is buybacks, in which the government purchases water licences directly from willing irrigators via an open tender process.
The second involves subsidising irrigation infrastructure on (and off) farms to improve water efficiency, with a percentage of the assumed water savings being transferred to a licence held by the government.
However, open tender buybacks essentially <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/27/murray-darling-basin-deal-caps-water-buybacks" target="_blank">stopped in 2014</a> in favour of infrastructure projects. This was due to the widespread belief that buybacks were inflating the price of water and causing economic hardship in rural communities.
Our research, published in <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928765518304585" target="_blank">Resource and Energy Economics</a>, set out to test this assumption of the impact of water recovery on water markets. We found that water scarcity (due to seasonal change or water allocation reductions) had far more influence on water prices than government water recovery. In fact, voluntary, open tender buybacks are the most cost-effective and low-risk option for increasing river flow.
By ignoring this option, we are hamstringing Australia’s ability to flexibly cope with drought conditions and long-term climate change.
Lessons from 20 years of data
My colleagues and I wanted to understand the impact of government water recovery on the Murray-Darling Basin’s water markets. To do so, we needed to understand the dynamics and drivers of the markets both before and after buybacks began.
We looked at monthly prices over twenty years in the Goulburn catchment in Victoria (<a href="https://www.mdba.gov.au/managing-water/water-markets-trade/interstate-water-trade" target="_blank">1A Greater Goulburn</a>) - both for permanent water markets (where a water licence is permanently transferred) and temporary ones (a seasonal transfer of water).
<a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/295324/original/file-20191002-49365-xmv3hp.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/295324/original/file-20191002-49365-xmv3hp.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt=""></a>
The drivers of water market prices in temporary and permanent water markets are different, but market dynamics are similar: market volatility shocks go from prices to volumes.
<a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/295325/original/file-20191002-49404-n8hk9p.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/295325/original/file-20191002-49404-n8hk9p.png?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt=""></a>
Temporary water trade is driven by water scarcity, caused by factors such as seasonal fluctuation in water allocated to licences and the weather. Conversely, permanent water trade is influenced by a combination of past prices and temporary water prices.
What about government intervention?
We found no evidence that government water recovery influenced water prices in either market in a statistically significantly way.
However, we did find that increases in the amount of water recovered by the government reduced the volume of temporary water traded. This is probably due to the fact that many irrigators who sold water to the government had been <a href="https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1759-3441.12038" target="_blank">selling surplus temporary water</a>, and this volume was then taken out of the market.
We also found that government water recovery increased the volatility of temporary market prices and volumes, signalling potential increased risk and uncertainty for irrigators engaging in temporary water markets.
These results are significantly different to previous estimates by consultants, some of which suggest government buybacks cause <a href="http://rmcg.com.au/app/uploads/2017/01/Basin-Plan-Impact-GMID_Final_14-October-2016.pdf" target="_blank">temporary water market prices to double</a>.
Our findings contradict this. Our results are in line with and reinforce other peer-reviewed economic literature, which has shown buyback of water entitlements had <a href="https://mdbrcsa.govcms.gov.au/sites/g/files/net3846/f/mdbrc-submission-professor-sarah-wheeler-sa.pdf?v=1527826747" target="_blank">far less impact on rural communities than commonly claimed</a>.
This is partly because government buybacks simply do not create large enough changes in the amount of seasonal water available to affect prices, given that variability. A 1% increase in water buybacks caused a 0.1% drop in temporary water volume traded. In addition, farmers are very good at adapting to changes in water, and have a number of strategies and options available to them in most years.
Unfortunately, commonly held perceptions about the impacts of buyback on rural communities and water markets has had serious policy ramifications.
Irrigation schemes are not enough
As noted earlier, buybacks are now off the table. Funding for water recovery is now directed exclusively to infrastructure projects, which are deficient in a number of key respects.
Since water buybacks started in 2008, A$2.5 billion has been spent to recover 1,227 gigalitres of water licences. At the same time, A$3.9 billion has been spent so far on things like lining channels and building dams, which has saved <a href="http://www.agriculture.gov.au/water/mdb/progress-recovery/progress-of-water-recovery" target="_blank">695 gigalitres</a>.
Water recovery by infrastructure schemes now cost at <a href="https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023039" target="_blank">least three times</a> as much as buybacks per megalitre recovered. These infrastructure projects <a href="https://theconversation.com/paddling-blind-why-we-urgently-need-a-water-audit-122118">may not</a> return as much water to the environment as assumed, while they also also create the risk of <a href="https://wentworthgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Requirements-for-SDL-adjustment.pdf" target="_blank">environmental harm</a>.
Irrigation infrastructure <a href="http://www.fao.org/3/I7090EN/i7090en.pdf" target="_blank">subsidies</a> can also expand total irrigation areas and increase water use, and encourage a conversion from seasonal crops to permanent plantings such as orchard trees. These permanent crops demand a fixed amount of water every year, making farms less adaptable in the face of drought and climate change.
How did policy get this wrong?
The results of our water market study show that there are key differences between high quality, peer-reviewed economic science on the one hand, and short-term consultancies and people’s perceptions on the other.
High quality economic science takes time, expertise and requires reputable, consistent and long-term datasets that control for the myriad of influences on economic change. Short-term consultancies and inquiries (such as the Northern Basin Review) are often rushed, not representative and are often not based on reliable datasets.
Inquiries also often amplify the voices of <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S026483771630401X" target="_blank">lobby groups and the people who are most aggrieved</a> by water recovery, while other voices – floodplain irrigators, indigenous representatives, irrigators who want water reallocated to the environment – may be <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/environment/conservation/the-thirsty-giants-killing-our-rivers-20190411-p51d4j" target="_blank">silenced</a>.
There are currently two inquiries looking at <a href="https://www.accc.gov.au/focus-areas/inquiries/inquiry-into-murray-darling-basin-water-markets" target="_blank">water markets</a> and <a href="https://www.basin-socio-economic.com.au/" target="_blank">socio-economic conditions in the basin</a>. It is vitally important they capture all voices equally and are supplemented by independent, high quality analysis.
If we can’t understand the real drivers of change in the Basin, we can’t identify the best options for improving the social and economic health of its communities – particularly in the face of drought and climate change.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/124491/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;">
Sarah Ann Wheeler, Professor in Water Economics, University of Adelaide.
This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/scarcity-drives-water-prices-not-government-water-recovery-new-research-124491" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

Scarcity drives water prices, not government water recovery: Sarah Ann Wheeler

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
The increasing thirst of Australia’s biggest cities routinely exceeds our capacity to rely on rainfall for drinking water. Australia is facing a fast-approaching “perfect storm” of growing urban populations and declining rainfall to supply storage reservoirs.
Despite these challenges, our capital cities’ rapid population growth is forecast to continue in coming decades. Sydney, for example, is expected to grow by 1.6 million people in 20 years, but is predicted to be overtaken by Melbourne as the nation’s largest city by then.
How is Australia going to ensure the swelling urban population has enough water? The last two decades provide some important clues.
The largest east coast centres (Melbourne, Canberra, Brisbane and Sydney) have all faced water supply challenges, but Perth and Adelaide have really been pushed to extreme levels. Current water storage levels in Australian capital cities range from 94.2% in Hobart and 69.7% in Melbourne through to 40.4% in Perth – the lowest of the capital cities. Only a year ago it was an alarming 28.5%.
Why are Perth’s water storages so low? Because of steep declines in rainfall and catchment runoff into the city’s dams.
The world is watching Perth and its water supply crisis. The long-term volume of water flowing into the Perth supply has plummeted from an annual average of 338 gigalitres (1911 to 1974) to less than 50 GL/year (2010-2016). During this 43-year “big dry”, the number of people served by the Perth water supply has increased steeply.
How has Perth managed to survive? Desalination and groundwater have come to the rescue. Perth relies less on catchment runoff and surface storages, and now has two giant desalination plants. It also has tapped into groundwater as a major source of domestic water.
Solutions have been costly
All water utilities across Australia struggle with increased population growth and extended periods of low rainfall. The Millennium Drought caused widespread problems for all Australian urban water supplies. The levels in major east coast storages shrivelled to the lowest levels in decades.
Melbourne’s water storages fell to a perilous low of 26% in June 2009. A large part of Adelaide’s water supply has relied on declining flows in the Murray River. The drought combined with extractions by upstream water users reduced the Murray to a trickle in 2006-07.
All of the mainland states have built huge desalination plants, but these come with huge price tags. The Melbourne plant cost about A$4 billion.
Operational costs are enormous, even if the plants sit idle. The Sydney plant’s costs are more than A$500,000 a day, although it has not supplied any water since 2012 as the city’s stored water supply remains higher than 60% of capacity.
Desalination also uses enormous quantities of electricity to extract fresh water from salt water. During his time as NSW premier, Bob Carr referred to desalination as “bottled electricity”. This is important to consider given the power crisis facing eastern Australia.
Urban growth affects water quality
The growth of the urban populations and other human activities is linked to water quality issues in urban water supplies. Melbourne’s water catchments are mostly “closed” – minimal private landholdings and human activity are permitted. In contrast, Sydney and Brisbane have more “open” catchments, which include private lands.
Three Brisbane storages (Wivenhoe, North Pine and Somerset) have water quality issues linked to agriculture and other human activity in the catchments. Sydney’s massive Warragamba Dam has a huge catchment that includes more than 110,000 people. The settlements are served by nine sewage treatment plants, most of which discharge treated sewage into drinking water catchment rivers.
A recent audit of the Sydney catchments and storages reported that sewage treatment plant upgrades had improved water quality. The audit recommended that future upgrades improve sewage treatment for the growing urban population in the NSW Southern Highlands (Bowral, Mittagong and Moss Vale).
The case for water conservation and recycling
Perth and Adelaide are the two capitals under most water supply stress. They are an example for all Australian capitals to consider when planning future water supply challenges and solutions. Both Perth and Adelaide now heavily rely on recycled water and desalination.
Recycling waste water for use in urban water supplies is important for all urban centres, particularly Perth and Adelaide. The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization points out that waste water has numerous public health risks, so risk management is essential for all recycled water schemes.
Perth and Adelaide are both using more groundwater than the other capital cities. Perth is extracting more groundwater from deep aquifers north of the city. Perth is also pumping treated waste water into shallower groundwater aquifers to replenish the supply.
No new large water supply dam has been built in Australia since the 1980s. The challenge of meeting future urban water demand is not likely to be solved by building new dams.
While desalination, groundwater and recycling are all growing in importance, our individual actions to conserve and use less water are key. For example, the consumption of water per person in Sydney has dropped from 500 litres a day in 1990 to less than 300 litres. Melbourne has a daily target of 155 litres per person.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/86301/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">There is plenty of room for improvement. According to United Nations data, Australia still has the second-highest daily water consumption per person. The US has the world’s highest at 575 litres a day. The UK is already exceeding Melbourne’s target with 149 litres per day. Tragically, in Mozambique, water is in such short supply that people there use a paltry four litres per day.
Ian Wright, Senior Lecturer in Environmental Science, Western Sydney University.
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/this-is-what-australias-growing-cities-need-to-do-to-avoid-running-dry-86301" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

This is what Australia's growing cities need to do to avoid running dry: Ian Wright

<html><body>
The star NRL Bulldogs recruit Kieran Foran has secured the pre-auction sale of his Freshwater house.
It was the <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-nsw-freshwater-126594982" target="_blank">home that Foran bought</a> early last year - where his former partner Rebecca Pope and the couple's two children resided during his playing stint in New Zealand.
His Ray White agents secured $3.055 million, having had $2.8 million price guidance.
After the for sale sign board went up, an upset Pope told the local paper, The Manly Daily that she'd viewed it as her "forever"home.
"I wanted to stay here forever," she said.
“It was our dream home with a big block, ideal for our children and two dogs."
A legal battle over the proceeds has begun, with Pope's lawyers lodging a caveat on the home which is officially just in Foran's name.
The legal paperwork suggested she made "direct and indirect financial and non-financial contributions to the acquisition, conservation and maintenance of the lands."
Foran paid $2.51 million in early 2016.
By the time the home had settled and the family moved in, their relationship was over with their private life being aired in public.
Foran, who left the Warriors to return to Sydney because he wanted to be closer to his kids, has not commented on his plans after the auction.
His latest Instragram features his recent fishing success.
His prior Instagram posts revealed his new relationship with 48 year old former Central Coast hairdresser, fitness instructor Karina May, a mother of six.
 
 
</body></html>

Kieran Foran sells at Freshie

<html><body>
The drama in NRL Bulldogs recruit Kieran Foran's off-field life has returned to the public arena following the listing of his Freshwater house for October auction.
It was the home that Foran bought early last year - where his former partner Rebecca Pope and the couple's two children resided during his playing stint in New Zealand.
After the for sale sign board went up, an upset Pope told the local paper, The Manly Daily that she'd viewed it as her "forever"home.
"I wanted to stay here forever," she said this week.
“It was our dream home with a big block, ideal for our children and two dogs."
A legal battle over the likely $2.8 plus auction proceeds has quietly begun, with Pope's lawyers lodging a caveat on the home which is officially just in Foran's name.
The legal paperwork suggested she made "direct and indirect financial and non-financial contributions to the acquisition, conservation and maintenance of the lands."
Foran paid $2.51 million in early 2016.
By the time the home had settled and the family moved in, their relationship was over with their private life being aired in public.
Pope moved in with young children Jordan and Emmy and went about renovating the family home, around the time Foran was stood down indefinitely by the Parramatta Eels for personal issues.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/10/09/Foran2.jpg" alt="">
The story, which raged early last year, fell off the radar when Foran moved to the New Zealand Warriors, where he had a mixed season in the 17 games he played.
While the heat is now back on the championship half-back to settle the fresh turmoil, a new budding romance has been making the headlines over the past week.
His Instagram features his new relationship with 48 year old former Central Coast hairdresser, fitness instructor Karina May, a mother of six.
The long-time Manly Sea Eagle, who left the Warriors to return to Sydney because he wanted to be closer to his kids, has not commented on his plans after the auction.
It now has modern updates, with renovated living and dining spaces, as well as a brand new kitchen, installed by Pope.
The full brick home has five bedrooms, three bathrooms, a home office and a 15 metre swimming pool.
Ray White Freshwater agents Graham Bennett and Bernard Hachenberg have set an October 28 auction.
This article was first published in the Sunday Telegraph.
</body></html>

Kieran Foran lists Freshwater home 

<html><body>
NRL player Kieran Foran's circumstance involves, in part, the stress of buying a new home.
The family have been renovating their Freshwater purchase which cost him $2.51 million in February.
Set on a large 1018 sqm block, the full brick family home has five bedrooms, a home office and swimming pool. It last traded five decades ago.
His Belrose house was bought for $1.06 million back in 2012.
Foran has recently been stood down indefinitely by the Parramatta Eels for personal issues.
Ray White Freshwater agents Graham Bennett and Bernard Hachenberg secured the sale.
It was thought Foran might have bought closer to his new club, but in fact he's moved closer to his old stomping ground.
He took ownership of the home on March 31.
This article was first published in the Saturday Daily Telegraph.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Kieran Foran buys in Freshwater

<html><body>
Sea Eagles coach Trent Barrett and his wife, Kylie have bought in Manly heartland as the club heads into its 70th anniversary year.
It was a fairly even price swap following the sale of their Shellharbour district home three months ago.
The couple spent $2.41 million at Freshwater through Sweetnams, which is just $10,000 more than the $2.4 million they secured in their record Barrack Point sale.
That listing came just before Barrett was appointed to replace Geoff Toovey after the Sea Eagles finished out of the NRL finals race for the first time in a decade.
The Barrett's had paid $904,000 for the oceanfront reserve house in 2004. 
</body></html>

Freshwater

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Freshwater

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News