Treasury

<html><body>
Figures from Federal Treasury show there were 88,000 established homes owned by temporary residents as of March 2015.
There are concerns that people on temporary residency visas — who are entitled to buy established homes as long as they sell on leaving the country — have kept their properties as investments.
NSW accounts for 26% with Victoria constituting 25 per cent of those home approvals as temporary visa-holders.
Western Australia accounts for 22% of the established housing market for temporary residents, Fairfax Media report.
Queensland has 19% followed by South Australia with 4%, the ACT with 1.5%, Tasmania with 1.1% and Northern Territory with 0.2%.
Temporary residents are allowed to buy one established dwelling to live in, but are required to sell it when their visa expires or the property is no longer their primary residence.
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

NSW heads the 88,000 temporary resident home ownership stats

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
Federal Treasurer Joe Hockey’s call for a proper debate on state taxes and the state governments’ over-reliance on inefficient state taxes including stamp duty is welcome and completely in line with community attitudes. The Treasurer’s speech comes just days after polling revealed widespread public acceptance of future GST changes.
Joe Hockey has said what everyone knows – stamp duty is a harmful, distortive tax which needs to be abolished and this will require broader tax reform to be achieved.
Abolishing stamp duty and replacing it with a more efficient revenue base would address housing affordability, boost the economy, be supported by the community, and bolster fragile state budgets.
Obviously the removal of stamp duty needs to occur in conjunction with a broader series of tax changes so that states and territories have the revenue they need to deliver services, and it is essential that GST reform is on the table.
A report from Newgate Research Community attitudes towards tax reform, commissioned by the Property Council, found that nine out of ten Australians surveyed supported tax reform which made the system simpler and fairer.
Far from being political poison, people see the GST as our fairest tax.
Our research shows that a reformed GST would pass the fairness test set by our political leaders.
Some 65% of respondents believed the GST to be fair or very fair, and only 35% as unfair, with most citing its benefit as a tax that cannot be dodged.
While there was some variation, this fairness rating was the majority view regardless of the respondent's gender, age, state, voting intention or property tenure.
The research also shows that people think it is inevitable that the GST will go up. When asked what they believed would happen over the next decade, almost three quarters (72%) said the GST will increase.
Strikingly, only 2% believed it would definitely not go up and just 6% that it would probably not go up. For the public, this is almost a done deal.
Getting rid of stamp duty needs to be a top priority of every government in the country. It has the highest costs to economic growth and living standards.
Treasury’s own modelling shows that Australia’s economic welfare is reduced by 73 cents for every dollar of stamp duty raised, which is 50% worse than company tax and three and a half times worse than income tax or the GST.
The Treasurer’s call today coincides with a release of the Grattan Institute’s Property Taxes working paper which moots the introduction of a new property tax on owner occupied housing.
We welcome the Grattan’s Institute acknowledgement that stamp duty needs to be abolished, but the idea of introducing yet another new property tax without retiring existing inefficient taxes is unfair and will unacceptable to the community.
The Grattan report conveniently leaves out stamp duty in its attempts to argue that property is undertaxed in Australia.
The industry currently pays $77 billion of taxes to all three levels of government. Treasury estimates that property specific taxes make up 9% of Australia's total tax take compared to an OECD average of just 5%. We're surprised Grattan would get this so wrong.
Furthermore the Grattan Institute report admits that they would need an extra new property tax at double the rate they proposed to fund the replacement of stamp duty.
The Property Council is happy to explore the option of a broad based low rate land tax, but the reality is that it won’t raise enough money to abolish stamp duty, it will be politically unpopular and it doesn’t do anything to fix the high land taxes on commercial and investment property.
There is absolutely no justification for a new property tax that does not offset other punitive taxes.
Changes to the GST is a practical solution to enable stamp duties to be retired to boost the economy in a way that is fair.
Ken Morrison is chief executive of Property Council of Australia. He can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertyoz.com.au/Profiles/ProfileDetail.aspx?pid=76" target="_blank">here</a>. 
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Hockey’s call for proper debate on state taxes welcome

<html><body>
Further developments into possible legislation tightening foreign investment in residential real estate have been made with stakeholders invited to make a submission into the substantive Bills making up Treasury's Exposure Draft into implementing foreign investment reform.
Treasury are asking for submissions into the Fees Imposition Bill, with the eventual reforms will be given effect by the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Legislation Amendment Bill 2015, the Register of Foreign Ownership of Agricultural Land Bill 2015 and the Foreign Acquisitions and Takeovers Fees Imposition Bill 2015.
According to the submission the government aims to promote greater transparency through a lands register, implement a simpler foreign investor framework, transfer all residential real estate functions to the ATO and enforce stricter penalties for illegal foreign investment.
CoreLogic RP Data's senior research analyst Cameron Kusher recently stated that while housing may be looking expensive to locals, the declining Australian dollar <a href="cameron-kusher/44003-australian-property-expensive-for-us-not-so-for-foreigners-cameron-kusher" target="_blank">means that it may be looking more attractive to foreign buyers</a>.
The Exposure Drafts and Regulatory Impact Statement of legislation designed to tighten foreign investment rules can be read <a href="https://treasury.gov.au/ConsultationsandReviews/Consultations/2015/Implementing-Foreign-Investment-Reforms" target="_blank" style="line-height: 1.3em;">here</a>, with submissions open up until Friday 17 July.
 
</body></html>

mick.cee-iDmgDDAmu8

Government calls for foreign investment reform submissions

<html><body>
The Opposition has again slammed Treasurer Joe Hockey's latest crackdown on foreigners owning Australian land, describing it as a diversion from tackling housing affordability.
Mr Hockey announced the forced sale of six homes around the country. 
Three of the properties were in the Sydney suburbs of Eastwood, Fairfield and Mosman, two were in Kewdale in Perth and the other at Eight Mile Plains on the outskirts of Brisbane.
There were five owners from four different countries who had come forward since the crackdown began in ernest with a $39 million diverestiture order against a Piper Point buyer in March.
The six self reported cases ranged in price from $152,000 to $1.86 million.
There are 50 investigators looking into 462 cases in which foreigners were suspected of having bought or retained existing property without correct approvals. 
The Australian Taxation Office, the Foreign Investment Review Board, Department of Immigration and AUSTRAC have uncovered more than 2000 pieces of information relating to suspected breaches since monitoring of residential property acquisitions was shifted to the ATO in May from the FIRB. 
The Treasurer outlined his new, harsher penalties that will be enforced from December, against foreign investors who illegally buy established Australian properties or don't sell when the laws required.
"The period of amnesty we announced in May means that no criminal conviction is recorded for those who self-report by November 30, and they have to re-sell their property in 12 months, instead of three," Mr Hockey said.
"Australia welcomes foreign investment and Australia needs foreign investment but, at all times, foreign investors must comply with our laws," Joe Hockey said on Saturday.
"Some of the five investors have purchased property with Foreign Investment Review Board approval, but their circumstances have changed and they have failed to comply with the divestment requirements.
"Some have simply broken the rules by purchasing a property without approval and done so against the law.
"Time is running out for foreign investors to voluntarily come forward if they have illegally purchased existing residential real estate," Mr Hockey warned. 
"They have until November 30, 2015 to come to us before we come to them."
</body></html>

Foreigners admit overstaying their Australian land ownership  

<html><body>
The Federal Opposition has demanded to be consulted ahead of any federal election in July on the appointment of the Reserve Bank governor.
It is speculated the deputy governor will succeed Glenn Stevens as the central bank's governor.
The Australian Financial Review says Treasurer Scott Morrison has declined to consult with the opposition on any promotion to governor of Reserve Bank of Australia deputy Philip Lowe, who has won Labor's backing.
Shadow treasurer Chris Bowen on Monday demanded the government stop naming senior Treasury portfolio positions without consulting the opposition, because he argued the government is now effectively on an election footing.
</body></html>

Labor demands to be consulted on next RBA governor 

<html><body>
The federal Treasury has proposed to streamline the buying of new property by foreign investors.
It says the current set of rules had unintentionally encouraged non-compliance due to its complicated structure.
It also proposes to encourage investment in sectors like retirement living, aged-care and student accommodation.
The consultation paper by the Treasury's Foreign Investment Policy Unit said the December 2015 overhaul of the foreign investment framework – the biggest in 40 years – had unintentionally “incentivised non-compliance" of the rules when it came to buying new residential property, according to a report in the Australian Financial Review.
Under current rules, foreign investors who want to purchase a new dwelling or block of vacant residential land need to apply individually for each property they are considering and pay multiple fees starting from $5000 per application.
To avoid through this cumbersome process, some foreign buyers were choosing to pay a fine and notify after they had purchased the property, rather than apply multiple times in advance, the paper said.
It suggested the introduction of an "new exemption certificate" giving foreign persons "broad pre-approval to purchase one new dwelling or vacant residential block".
Foreign buyers would then be required to notify Australian authorities when an actual purchase was made. 
The report also seeks to amend the treatment of residential land that is used for an aged-care facility, retirement village or student accommodation so that it is considered "non-vacant commercial land" thus lifting the FIRB screening threshold from zero to more than $55 million.
Some in the industry, like Julius Wei, co-founder of BMY Group, which connects Chinese high-net worth investors with opportunities in Australia, said the country was short of supply in these sectors and foreign investment into them "should be welcomed".
But he said the rules needed to incentivise foreign investors to invest for yield rather than capital gain, otherwise there could be a "huge jump in prices".
"Capital gains [in these sectors] should be taxed heavily," he said.
Wei also backed the proposed exemption certificate for individual buyers as according to him it was unfair to pay multiple fees if a buyer only intended to buy one property.
</body></html>

Treasury

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Treasury

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News