Taxation

<html><body>
<p class="p1">Bill Shorten and Labor are promising to perform a mathematical miracle in the real estate industry: they have a policy under which prices will keep rising but affordability will improve.</p>
<p class="p1">Labor justified its real estate taxation policy with the claimed desire to improve housing affordability. Shorten in his policy announcement essentially blamed all price rises over the past 30 years on negatively-geared investors and inferred that nobbling them would revolutionise affordability.</p>
<p class="p1">This has scared the living daylights out Australians who live in the 70 percent of households which own their homes. Labor was promising to reduce the value of their major asset.</p>
<p class="p1">Since Labor realised the fundamental flaw in its policy pitch, it has been at pains to claim that property values won’t fall under its changes. The ALP-aligned think tank, The McKell Institute, is now saying that house prices will keep rising under the Labor policy.</p>
<p class="p1">So Labor proposes to perform a statistical miracle. Prices will keep rising but affordability will improve. One wonders about the means they will use to achieve this. Other than lower prices, the only mechanisms for improving affordability are a big cut in interest rates (already at record lows and not controlled by the politicians) and/or a big rise in incomes (not part of the plan, as far as I know).</p>
<p class="p1">This confirms – yet again – that politicians collectively lack even a primary school understanding of how property markets work and how their blinkered policies impact on real estate consumers. They seem unable to think policies through to logical conclusions. They keep introducing laws which they claim will improve affordability but which make it worse – every time.</p>
<p class="p3">This is playing out at a state level, with the Governments in charge of the two biggest states slugging foreign investors with new taxes. They maintain that this will somehow make housing cheaper but sadly - yet again - it will have the opposite impact.</p>
<p class="p3">There are widely diverging views on affordability – how serious it is, what causes the problem, who’s to blame for prices rising and how to fix things. But one area where most parties tend to agree is that increasing the supply of dwellings would have a beneficial impact.</p>
<p class="p3">In fact, the best chance of bringing down prices at a local level is creation of an oversupply. As we have seen in selected locations around Australia in recent years, it’s the one major element that causes prices to drop.</p>
<p class="p3">Specific markets, notably inner-city apartment markets in some capital cities, are poised for a hefty rise in supply which is linked directly to foreign investment. If planned projects proceed, price decline is almost inevitable.</p>
<p class="p3">But state government moves in Victoria and New South Wales to lift sharply increase taxes on foreign buyers of Australia real estate are likely to prevent or limit that increase in supply.</p>
<p class="p3">Coupled with moves by the banks to curtail lending to foreign buyers and ATO measures affecting sales above $2 million, Australia has quickly cobbled together a series of major disincentives to foreign investment. There are reports of Asian investors switching their focus away from Australia to other, more welcoming nations.</p>
<p class="p3">If foreign investors stop buying (they won’t all be turned away, but many will, I suspect) many of the proposed apartment projects simply will not be built. </p>
<p class="p3">The big increase in new dwelling supply will be lost, as will many construction jobs. </p>
<p class="p3">In reality, I suspect the state measures have little to do with a desire to improve affordability. It’s essentially a cash grab, disguised as a measure to help young Australians achieve home ownership.</p>
<p class="p3">Like everything else coming out of the befuddled brains of politicians, the moves will make the problems in real estate worse.</p>
<p class="p1"><em>Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a></em></p>
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

Cash grab or about affordability? Terry Ryder

<html><body>
<p>SPONSORED POST</p>
<p>If you have bought an off-the-plan property, assessing that property post construction is an important part of the settlement process.</p>
<p>Of course, you want to ensure that the property you agreed to purchase is the same that is being delivered so that you’re getting what you’re paying for!</p>
<p>The most cost effective way to make sure your property is delivered just as your purchase contract promised, is to have your contract documentation reviewed and the property physically inspected and assessed by an appropriately qualified Building Consultant.</p>
<p>An NBtax Condition Assessment, completed by a Napier &amp; Blakeley Building Consultant will take note of the ‘as built finish’ of your property. From our initial review of purchase documentation, contract of sale, agreed finishes and specifications, we have a unique understanding of what was agreed to be built.</p>
<p>We will inspect your property on your behalf, asses and document the condition of the finishes within the property, good or bad.</p>
<p>Following an inspection a Condition Assessment will be completed by NBtax and will provide a concise summary of the condition of the property. It will list defects that the developer and or builder should address to deliver the property that is consistent with expectations, including but not always limited to, the agreed plans and specifications, good building practice and expected industry standard.</p>
<p>Our assessment will give you a clear understanding of any potential issues or defects before you take possession, move in or put the property up for lease.  It also gives you peace of mind, providing you with a document that will ensure agreed items between you, the purchaser, and the vendor are installed or rectified prior to settlement.</p>
<p>The best time to have a Condition Assessment completed is as close as possible to the planned settlement date. It is important to note that you still have a contractual obligation to settle your purchase on time. However, under normal circumstances having a condition assessment completed on your property will make you a more informed purchaser and provide you with a written report to enable you to highlight to the developers identifying items requiring attention.</p>
<p>This service is especially valuable to those offshore purchasers who are not present at the time of settlement. We are able to act on their behalf during settlement inspections to ensure relevant conditions are met within the sale contract.</p>
<p>Our specialised teams are ready to help, contact us today.</p>
<p><em>For more information, <a href="https://nbtax.com.au/" target="_blank">click here</a>.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
</body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

Be sure to get what you paid for!

<html><body>
<div>It's the end of financial year!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>It was a really strong finish to the year for share markets today, closing up by 1.8 percent. However, the Aussie stock markets finished the financial year down by an underwhelming 4.1 percent.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>With the tax year now having come to an end, it will soon be time to lodge those tax returns.  </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Holiday homes under scrutiny this year</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>Last year, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) designed and implemented new compliance strategies for foreign investors in Australian property, including stakeholder engagement (with advisers, agents, and associations), improved data matching, and a broad investigation strategy into illegal foreign purchases.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>This year - as well as those claiming excessive work-related expenses such as travel expenses, self-education, uniform, mobile phone, and internet costs – it is resident Australians with rental properties that are more likely to be under scrutiny from the ATO at tax time - in particular those will holiday homes.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>During the past year ATO Commissioners have advised Farifax Media and SBS News that they have been in contact with thousands of owners of rental properties in order to clarify their entitlements or request clarification about claims that they've made. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The ATO has further reportedly sent correspondence to some holiday home owners recommending that they "review the nature of their claims" before dropping in their next returns...oops!<br><br>
</div>
<div>With well over 2 million Australians lodging tax returns declaring ownership of a rental property - spread widely across all income brackets – the landlord sector is substantial, and there are potentially significant liabilities to be raised by the ATO.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Click to enlarge</div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/ATO1.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>Owners of holiday homes should take a good deal of care not to make claims for net rental losses for periods when their property has not actually been made available for rent. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>In particular owners of holiday homes claiming deductions for a full year when the property has been vacant for long periods might expect to get a tap on the shoulder from the tax office.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>According to ATO legislation the principles that apply to a rental property also apply to a holiday home if it is rented out - if you rent out your holiday home, you can claim expenses for the property based on the proportion of the income year it was rented out or was genuinely available for rent.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>However, if a holiday home is advertised in ways that limit its exposure to potential tenants, then the property may not be deemed “genuinely available” for rent – for example, if the property is not widely advertised, or if the advertised rents are set at unrealistically high levels.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Since the ATO’s interest was flagged some months ago, net rental losses declared or claimed on holiday homes could be lower this year as this loophole is sewn up...</div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><em>Airbnb </em>and online networks</span></strong></div>
<div> </div>
<div>There may also be some confusion relating to the rise of online networks such as <em>Airbnb</em>, with more Australians than ever before choosing to rent out their own homes, or a part of their homes. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Remember, rental income is assessable and therefore you may have tax to pay at year end - don't try to be sneaky and under-report rental income it or you may be penalised! </div>
<div> </div>
<div>For <em>Airbnb</em> hosts there are two types of allowable deductions. Firstly, there are costs directly associated with generating rental income or with the rental area (for eaxample, photography, commercial cleaning costs, food for tenants, <em>Airbnb</em> fees and commissions, or food made available to tenants). </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And secondly there are costs which may be apportioned, often based upon the applicable floor area, including your mortgage or rent, utilities, internet and phone costs, insurance, and so on.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Keep records and receipts through the financial year and make sure you set aside some money for the tax liability!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Also, be aware of the potential legal and liability risks or short term tenancies and other tax implications thereof, such as capital gains tax (the principal place of residence is normally exempt, but generating rental income from the home may trigger a change in this status).  </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Repairs and maintenance</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>There is also often genuine confusion for some property investors over what deductions can be claimed.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Perhaps the most common mistake made by landlords on lodged tax returns is claiming deductions for repairs and maintenance for expenses which are actually capital costs. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Property investors are not allowed to claim repairs and maintenance deductions for defects or pre-existing damage that was in evidence at the time they acquired the property. Such improvements are considered to be capital in nature.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Where investors are unsure they would be well advised to check the rules relating to deductions made available by the ATO for free online, or to engage a tax agent or property specialist tax accountant that is familiar with the rules. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Net rental losses declining</span></strong></div>
<div><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"> </span></strong></div>
<div>Declared net rental losses have declined sharply in recent times, falling by more than half over the last two tax years for which data is available, largely due to lower interest rates. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>The average net loss claimed by investors has fallen by 64 per cent since 2008 as mortgage repayments have become cheaper. These figures will continue to decline in 2015 and 2016 with interest rates having fallen.</div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2016/07/01/NG.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/NG.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>While the ATO will doubtless generally be looking for expenses claimed in error as part of their investigative reviews or audits, it is worth noting that many investors also fail to claim deductions which they are entitled to. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2016/07/01/NG2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div><img src="/images/2016/07/01/NG2.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div> </div>
<div>In particular, not all owners of rental properties are aware of the potentially generous capital allowances and tax depreciation deductions for plant and equipment which are available under the tax legislation.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>If you are in doubt, a property specialist tax accountant can help you to avoid making costly mistakes!</div>
<div> </div>
<div>
<p><span><em>PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>.</em><br></span></p>
<p><em>His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.</em></p>
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Tips and traps for property investors: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
<p>SPONSORED POST</p>
<p>Australia definitely is the place to be right now. Pretty much every state and territory in Australia appears to be enjoying steady property growth.</p>
<p>The apartment market is rising and developments are selling out before they’re even built. The low density residential markets in the middle and outer suburbs too are enjoying solid growth.</p>
<p>With property doing well in Australia, you’d think it’s the perfect time to buy, but it’s proving to be probably the hardest it has ever been for first time Aussie investors to enter the market. Banks are asking for bigger deposits, interest rates are on the down turn, and first home buyer grants are only for those first time buyers that want to live in their homes. The question many of us ask is; “Is the government doing anything to help first time investors in Australia?” </p>
<p>The answer is yes, and they did it 3 decades ago. The introduction of negative gearing and the golden gem that is Property Tax Depreciation, gives investors the chance to reduce the after tax cost of their investment, increase their cash flow all while having a property asset appreciate.</p>
<p>Property Tax Depreciation can be an excellent way to make negative gearing work in your favour. Current interest rates, and a competitive rental market make it very easy for a negatively geared investment to become positive. Positive is good – except for the additional burden of a tax bill!</p>
<p>Understanding your property investment, and the cost of it before you buy is prudent, and knowing the available property tax depreciation can, if anything boost your potential buying power. That extra $10-15k of deductions can make a huge difference in the property game.</p>
<p>Knowing how property tax depreciation works is pivotal when making your first property investment, or any property investment for that matter. As property tax depreciation diminishes over time, the older the property, the less property tax depreciation there is going to be available. One might say it’s always wiser to purchase newer property – this ensures you’ll be able to claim the maximum available property tax deprecation, putting more in your pocket during the life of your investment.</p>
<p>So you’ve bought your investment? Then we come to the harder part – who do we trust? Who do we go to, to ensure we have a maximised property tax depreciation schedule?</p>
<p>In the eighties when residential property tax depreciation was introduced to the Australian taxation system, there was only one company that people turned to; <strong>Napier &amp; Blakeley.</strong></p>
<p>Napier &amp; Blakeley were the first professional company to provide residential property tax depreciation advice, and over three decades on, they’re still the market leaders and still providing that same trustworthy advice through NBtax. NBtax is a division within Napier &amp; Blakeley that concentrates purely on the residential property depreciation market.   </p>
<p>With tax time so near, if you’ve purchased an investment property in the past year, make sure you’re prepared with a property tax depreciation schedule that’s best for you.</p>
<p><em>For more information, <a href="https://nbtax.com.au" target="_blank">click here</a>.</em></p>
</body></html>

Making your first property investment possible

<html><body>
<p><em>Dear Margaret,</em></p>
<p><em>I bought an investment property in 2010 and was rented for 3 years before my family moved in. We are still residing at the said property.</em></p>
<p><em>My question is: If I sell the property, will I pay capital gains tax? I have read that if you bought an investment property but lived in it within the first six years, you are exempted.</em></p>
<p><em>Can you please explain this further?</em></p>
<p><em>Thanks a lot.</em></p>
<p><em>Maria</em></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span>Hi Maria,</span></p>
<p><span>Capital Gains tax is very misunderstood, and the 6- year exemption even more so.  Many think, as do you, that you can live in a property sometime in that first 6 years to stop capital gains tax from accruing.  Others believe that you only have to move into an investment property for a while before you sell it in order to render it free from capital gains tax.</span></p>
<p><span>The tax office is not about to  let you off that easily!  Here are some important basics to know about Capital Gains tax:</span><span style="line-height: 1.3em;"> </span></p>
<p><span>1.</span><span>       </span><span>Your own home is capital gains tax free as long as you are living in it.</span></p>
<p><span>2.</span><span>       </span><span>If you move out of your family home and rent it out, you can have a capital gains tax exemption for up to 6 years from the day you move out.  The conditions for this are that you don’t have another property which becomes your principal place of residence (as you can only have one exemption at a time) and you either move back into it, or sell it within that six years. This might apply if you moved elsewhere and rented with the intention of moving back some day.</span></p>
<p><span>3.</span><span>       </span><span>If your absence is longer than the 6 years you will have only a partial exemption for the six years.</span></p>
<p><span>4.</span><span>       </span><span>A property bought for the purposes of earning an income accrues capital gains tax from the moment you buy it.</span></p>
<p><span>5.</span><span>       </span><span>If you move into the property and it becomes your principal place of residence, then you still have a pro-rated capital gains tax liability for the time that it was a rental.  The purchase price will be your cost base, and the gain will be established from the sale price, and then pro- rated for days rented/days not rented. There are a range of adjustments which can be made to these figures, but they are many and you should check with your accountant to find out what they are.</span><span style="line-height: 1.3em;"> </span></p>
<p><span>Moving into a former investment property cannot wipe your capital gains tax obligations in any circumstance. Equally if you move out of a family home and buy another one to live in, you must decide which property you want your principal place of residence exemption on – the former home or the new home.  If it is the former home, the new home you live in will attract CGT.  There are additional rules, such as the 6 month overlap rule – but this is where it gets complex and where advice from an accountant is paramount.</span></p>
<p><span> </span></p>
<p><span><em>Have a property question?         <a href="mailto:news@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a></em></span></p>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

What's my capital gains tax on an investment property? Ask Margaret

<html><body>
<p class="Body">If actions do indeed speak louder than words, then politicians don’t give a damn about housing affordability.</p>
<p class="Body">Often you’ll see their lips moving, and they appear to care about the cost of housing, but then they’ll take actions that cause costs to rise and affordability to worsen.</p>
<p>Victoria’s 2016-17 State Budget provides another example of why housing is so expensive in this country and why affordability is an enduring issue (although not nearly as serious as mainstream media would have us believe, especially outside of Sydney). </p>
<p>The Victoria Government has added to the taxation burden on the industry that creates new homes for families. The Property Council is right to be “deeply worried about the Government's unwillingness to deal with its property tax addiction” and to ask for a cap on property tax increases. </p>
<p>Governments at all levels treat the Australian housing industry as a cash cow and in every budget they milk it more. And the cost of providing housing keeps rising, while politicians point the finger of blame at innocent parties such as foreign investors and negatively-geared Australian investors. </p>
<p>“Land tax is up 28 percent, foreign investor taxes have been tripled and stamp duty is forecast to exceed $6 billion for the first time,” says the Property Council, in the wake of Victoria’s State Budget. “Melbourne cannot expect to remain Australia's most competitive city for property investment when its property tax haul is surging.</p>
<p>“Another area which concerns the property industry is the stockpiling of Growth Area Infrastructure Contributions (GAIC). Property developers are paying more than their fair share. It is time for the Government to provide full disclosure on where the money is being spent.”</p>
<p class="Body">The so-called clampdown on foreign investors is, sadly, another ploy by politicians to give the appearance of doing something about housing affordability while finding new ways to milk the property industry of revenue.</p>
<p class="Body">It’s a little like the Federal Government lifting the tax on cigarettes – they claim it’s to discourage smoking but in reality it’s a grab for revenue. If they were serious, they’d ban smoking altogether, just as they would ban foreign buyers if they truly believed they were the prime cause of high house prices in Sydney and Melbourne. </p>
<p class="Body">Victoria has introduced new taxes to slug foreign buyers and NSW is gearing up to do the same, while pretending it’s really a clampdown on illegal activity which allegedly pumps up prices.</p>
<p>The NSW Government is introducing new rules from July. Buyers and sellers of real estate will have to prove their residency and citizenship status before a sale is completed. A land tax certificate showing whether any money is owed must be supplied to a home-buyer by the vendors. The vendors must disclose their residency status and nationality when applying for the certificate. Foreign buyers will have to provide citizenship and visa details, plus FIRB clearance, through the stamp duty process.</p>
<p>The NSW Office of State Revenue will collect the new information on buyers' nationality. This will be passed to the ATO for inclusion in a national register of foreign ownership of land titles, which begins on July 1. The ATO will match data to ensure foreign buyers have paid a $5,000 fee for any property sold for less than $1 million, and $10,000 for properties over $1 million.</p>
<p>The process paves the way for the NSW Government to follow Victoria in imposing foreign buyer surcharges on land tax and stamp duty in the future.</p>
<p>How these moves address housing affordability is a mystery.</p>
<p class="Body">Here’s one way it may make it worse. Deterring foreign investment, upon which many major high-rise apartment projects depend, makes it likely many projects will not be built. The reduction in supply adds to the pressures which causes prices to rise.</p>
<p>NSW executive director of the Property Council Jane Fitzgerald says: “Turning investors away by imposing a huge new tax is one way to ensure it doesn’t get any better. There are international investors right now considering whether to build in NSW. If they choose to go elsewhere our housing affordability crisis will worsen.”</p>
<p>Well, exactly. But politicians, generally inept at seeing beyond the end of their noses, haven’t thought it through to that degree.</p>
<p>Rather than seeing foreign investment as being part of the solution (helping to lift the supply of dwellings), they choose to see them a problem – or perhaps, more correctly, as an unpopular minority to blame without losing votes.</p>
<p><em>Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://www.hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter.</a></em></p>
</body></html>

Politicians don’t give a damn about housing affordability: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
<p>Urban Taskforce Chief Executive, Tom Forrest, today congratulated NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian and Treasurer Dominic Perrottet for taking the lead by extending the exemption of stamp duty for first home buyers which will now apply to new homes worth up to 800,000.</p>
<p>Stamp duty relief will also apply, on a scaled basis, to newly built homes valued between $800,000 and $1 million as well as to vacant land worth up to $400,000.</p>
<p>Today the Commonwealth Treasurer called for Dominic Perrottet to put his cards on the table. Unbeknown to Josh Frydenberg, the NSW Government had already taken the decision to slash stamp duty on newly built homes worth up to $800,000. This will make a big difference to the struggling property market and to new buyers.</p>
<p>The problem with stamp duty and payroll tax is they are distortionary. The have the effect of creating a bias in the property market which slows down property transactions and payroll tax is simply a tax on employment – it is nuts.</p>
<p>Today’s announcement to increase the stamp Duty threshold from $650,000 to $800,000 is recognition by Treasurer Perrottet that housing prices are higher is Sydney than in the rest of the nation. The Urban Taskforce calls on the Commonwealth to apply these new thresholds to the HomeBuilder package and make it relevant to the biggest market in the nation – that of Greater Sydney.</p>
<p>Mr Forrest said the new National Cabinet approach to decision making has worked well to date in dealing with COVID-19, but the same approach needs to be adopted in relation to the vexed issue of tax reform. The NSW Government has been at the forefront of calling for taxation reform.</p>
<p>The Thodey Report (2020) into NSW-Federal Financial Relations called for the abolition of Stamp Duty and Payroll tax. At a Commonwealth level, the Henry Report (2009) made the same recommendation and has been gathering dust for a decade.</p>
<p>The Urban Taskforce has publicly called for the abolition of stamp duty and its replacement with a broadly based land tax or an extension of the application of the GST.</p>
<p>The GST was supposed to apply to all goods and services, thus creating enough revenue to fully compensate the unemployed, the poor and those on social security benefits as well as enabling the states to get rid of high inefficient taxes like Stamp Duty and payroll tax. The Urban Taskforce said that changes to the Tax system could stimulate the economy and help drive Australia our of recession.</p>
<p>Now is the time for the States and Commonwealth to come together and support: </p>
<ul>
<li>Progressive phase out of Stamp Duty to be replaced with a broad-based land tax or widening of the GST </li>
<li>Abolition of Payroll Tax </li>
<li>Removal of the additional stamp duty and land tax currently applied to all foreign investors </li>
<li>Broaden and extend the application of HomeBuilder to make it relevant to NSW homes and apartments.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>TOM FORREST </strong><em>is the Urban Taskforce Chief Executive Officer</em></p>
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Stamp duty relief is a ‘win-win’ for first home buyers and jobs: Tom Forrest

<html><body>
<p>EXPERT OBSERVATION</p>
<p>The Real Estate Institute of Australia welcomes the recent contribution by the Master Builders Association and the Housing Industry Association to the understanding of the economic impacts of changes to current arrangements for negative gearing and capital gains tax on property.</p>
<p>“The commissioned research highlights the significant contribution that the property sector makes to growth in the Australian economy,” REIA President Malcolm Gunning said. <br>“Australia’s property industry including new home building has been a crucial support to economic growth and increased employment in the transition away from a decade-long reliance on mining,” Mr Gunning said.</p>
<p>“The property sector is one of the largest sectors in the Australian economy in terms of employment, GDP and investment. It is also one of the most heavily taxed sectors with research by HIA showing that the average tax burden on the new housing sector is around 30 per cent of the value.</p>
<p>“If we are serious about addressing housing affordability we need to take a holistic approach by looking at all taxes and charges impacting on the final cost of housing. We cannot just tinker with one or two that are ‘easy fixes’ without fully considering the consequences.”</p>
<p>Mr Gunning said the government needs to be looking at supply-side solutions including streamlining planning processes and reducing extra taxation on homebuyers such as stamp duties.</p>
<p>“Improved infrastructure such as public transport to employment hubs which encourage decentralisation to more affordable suburban and regional areas should be considered.<br>“Recognising the importance that the property sector plays in the economy, REIA advocates the appointment of a Minister for Property Services,” Mr Gunning said.</p>
<p>“The Minister for Property Services can take leadership in addressing housing affordability by coordinating a holistic approach of all levels of government in objectively addressing all property taxes. For example, research shows that abolishing stamp duties and replacing them with land tax not only has a greater impact on affordability than changes to negative gearing and capital gains tax but improves economic growth.</p>
<p>“It is only then that a strategy can be formulated that pulls the right levers,” Mr Gunning concluded.</p>
<p>Malcolm Gunning is the REIA President.</p>
</body></html>

REIA calls for holistic approach to property taxation: Malcolm Gunning

<html><body>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">Westpac says uncertainty around the economic and fiscal outlook is ever present, but the downside risks have diminished somewhat relative to a year ago, with the world economy surprising to the upside.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">The comments came ahead of the pending release by the Treasurer of the Federal Government's Mid-Year Economic &amp; Fiscal Outlook (MYEFO) on Monday next week, December 18.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">The 2017 half yearly budget update will likely see minimal changes to the economic and fiscal forecasts and projections, Westpac economist <span>Andrew Hanlan </span>suggests.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">"That is a welcome change from the experience for much of the post GFC period, when Treasurers so often had to mark down the revenue outlook.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">In the May 2017 Budget, the budget deficit was forecast to moderate from $29.4bn, 1.6% of GDP, in 2017/18 to be approaching balance in 2019/20 and then edge into surplus in 2020/21, a forecast $7.4bn, 0.4% of GDP. </p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">Economic growth in 2017/18, in nominal terms, is set to exceed the Budget forecast, at a likely 4.5% vs an expected 4.0%. The mix of activity differs, with consumer spending softer, offset by investment by businesses and government.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">Commodity prices over past months proved to be more resilient than anticipated, boosting national income. More recently, commodity prices have moderated, suggesting that the MYEFO commodity price assumptions for the out years will be largely as in the Budget.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">The MYEFO profile for nominal GDP growth for the three years from 2018/19 is expected to be: 3.75% (downgraded from 4.00%); 4.50% (unchanged); and 4.75% (unchanged). The downgrade to 2018/19 reflects the risk that real GDP growth is revised to 2.75% from 3.0%, incorporating a weaker starting position for the household sector. </p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">The revenue profile across the four years will be boosted by the stronger starting position for the economy, by an expected: $2.4bn, $1.4bn, $1.0bn and $1.1bn.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">The expenditure profile is expected to be unchanged, with a modest $1bn undershoot on expenditures in 2017/18 to be offset by the cost of new policy measures.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">On these figures, the cumulative deficit for the four years is $40bn, $6bn lower than at Budget time, with the profile of: -$27bn (a $2bn upgrade); -$20bn, -$1.5bn and +$8.5bn.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">"The case could be made for modest personal income tax relief, potentially to be announced in the May 2018 Budget," Andrew Hanlan said.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">"This could be along the lines of those announced in the May 2016 Budget, shifting the income tax thresholds, costing $4bn over four years.</p>
<p dir="LTR" align="LEFT">"There is also the scope to amend the ten year company tax cut plan, which is already incorporated into the fiscal estimates."</p>
</body></html>

Westpac sees fewer downside risks and scope for tax cuts

<html><body>
<p>Property ownership is taxing.</p>
<p>It emerged last week that the pop star Guy Sebastian has put at risk his Los Angeles investment apartment after overlooking his US land tax obligations.</p>
<p>He could be in danger of losing the two bedroom 1960s condo after being delinquent in paying the taxes for the past seven years.</p>
<p>The US authorities are going to sell it on October 22, unless he pays up. Official records show he has been in default since 2011.</p>
<p>The former Australian Idol advised it had come about inadvertently after the bills had been redirected to Olympian Ian Thorpe's US nearby pad, as he had been briefly staying at Thorpe's place.</p>
<p>But all these land tax notices went unnoticed, and then Thorpe sold the house, so the letters never got back to Sebastian.</p>
<p>He also was naively unaware he had to pay land tax on the US property which cost $268,500 in 2010.</p>
<p>"I didn’t know you had to pay land tax for an apartment," he told Kyle and Jackie O's radio show.</p>
<p>There is nothing set and forget about property investment, here in Sydney, elsewhere in Australia or overseas.</p>
<p>Indeed there are onerous administrative burdens that come with ownership, for own occupation and especially for investment.</p>
<p>And property is increasingly becoming a revenue jackpot for governments. </p>
<p>The Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) recently released data revealing that 48.7% of local and state government taxation revenue comes from property taxes.</p>
<p>The data showed these two levels of government collect a record $40 billion annually in taxes from property buyers and owners.</p>
<p>By comparison, they collected $21 billion in taxes from employers.</p>
<p>With home values beginning to rise in mid-2012, taxes such as land tax, municipal rates and stamp duty on conveyances have all been on the increase.</p>
<p>Of the $40 billion in national property related tax revenue, some 40% came from municipal rates and 36% came from stamp duties on conveyances. Land tax was the other sizeable contributor to taxing accounting for 17% of revenue.</p>
<p>Property related tax revenue is only collected by these two levels of government on those who own properties. While our family homes are generally exempt from Federal tax, if you rent out part or all of it you must include the income in your tax return and you may have to pay capital gains tax when you sell it.</p>
<p>Replacing stamp duty with a blanket land tax would be unpopular but I see it as inevitable. </p>
<p>Cameron Kusher, CoreLogic RP Data’s senior research analyst, has calculated a blanket land tax to cover just the $16 billion in stamp duty revenue, would see every residential dwelling having to pay $1,700 annually based on the ABS estimate of around 9.4 million residential dwellings. </p>
<p>The issue of course is that governments are always looking to constantly grow their revenues. And property is seemingly the easiest of pickings given the perceived wealth benefits enjoyed through the decades of ownership.</p>
<p>This article first appeared in the Daily Telegraph. </p>
</body></html>

Taxation

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Taxation

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News