Risk

<html><body>
The international property developer of skyscraper Australia 108 has been questioned by the Singaporean stock exchange about the tower’s structural soundness.
It follows the decision to let some residents live in the unfinished building.
Some of the questions were prompted by an article in The Age on July 27 in which residents complained about cracking noises and defects.
Developer World Class Global and builder Multiplex maintain there is no risk to the safety of occupants nor the structural integrity of the building.
Residents started moving into lower levels of the Southbank block last year and the reported complaints were brought to light as construction of the upper floors continued.
The group said they had looked into concerns raised in The Age article and sought clarification from builder Multiplex.
“The company had received assurance from the main contractor [Multiplex] that there is categorically no risk to the safety of any occupant nor the structural integrity of Australia 108,” World Class Global said.
“The main contractor and the structural engineers have provided their reports and confirmations that the structure of Australia 108 is structurally sound and comply with Australian regulations. [sic]”
World Class Global released Multiplex’s statement assuring residents of their safety.
“Some residents have reported noise during extreme winds, which is not an uncommon occurrence in high-rise buildings,” Multiplex said in its July statement.
“This will be mitigated once the tower reaches its full height later this year and damper tanks are installed to the top of the building.
“Less than one defect has been reported per apartment in Australia 108, which is well below the industry average. There have been no defects reported that are structural in nature.”
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

SGX question Australia 108's developer about structural integrity

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
An economic update from Cushman &amp; Wakefield notes a geopolitical crisis is a major risk to the steadily improving global economy in 2017 and continued growth in Australian commercial real estate (CRE) markets.
According to Cushman &amp; Wakefield there have been a number of events over the past year with the potential to impact global economic growth such as the UK triggering Article 50, the fight for Raqqa, the US, French and Iranian Presidential elections, US rate rises and various terrorist events. Most of these have had little or indeed have had a positive impact. 
John Sears, national director of Research from Cushman and Wakefield said in recent weeks, tensions between North Korea and the US have escalated and subsided, leading to concerns over how Australian CRE might be impacted if a geopolitical conflict were to occur.
The research examines major conflicts or geopolitical events over the past 100 years or so and how Australian CRE, consumer sentiment, US bonds and Australian GDP have responded.
"History suggests that most recent conflicts, or events that have de-escalated short of actual conflict, while hitting confidence in the short-term, have had little impact on Australian CRE," Cushman &amp; Wakefield said.
"A longer-term conflict involving our key trading partners such as the US, Japan, South Korea or China would be likely to hurt Australian economic growth and Australian CRE, however, at this stage this appears a low probability.
"If this remains the case, Australian CRE should remain attractive, supported by an improving economy and relatively attractive yields when compared to bonds and major international CRE markets."
Australian CRE and historic conflicts
"Figure 1 indicates that since 1985, Australian office yields, as indicated by the MSCI/IPD Office Income Return, have been influenced more by the domestic economy than conflicts such as the two Gulf wars or the 9/11 terrorist event," Cushman &amp; Wakefield said.
"During Gulf War I (August 1990 to February 1991), yields did increase though this coincided with an Australian recession and CRE crash when vacancy rates in many Australian CBD office markets rose to over 20%. After the 9/11 terrorist event, CBD office market vacancy rates and office income returns recorded little change. Similarly, there was little change to yields after start of Gulf War II.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagona1.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 <img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagona1.png" alt="">
Sentiment and historic conflicts
"While CRE yields have recorded little change due to conflict in recent decades, sentiment has been hurt in the short term.
"Figure 2 highlights a jump in consumer sentiment at the end of the Vietnam War and dips when the Gulf and Falklands wars commenced as well as after 9/11. However, the dips have been relatively short lived and also coincided with recessions in the early 1980s and 1990s.
<h2 class="p1"><a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal2.png" target="_blank" style="font-family: Tahoma, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">Click to enlarge</a></h2>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal2.png" alt=""> 
US Bond Yield and historic conflicts
"A key driver of investment demand for Australian CRE has been relatively attractive yields compared to alternate investments such as bonds.
"While our historic CRE yield series is relatively limited, US government bond data is available back to the 1870s. Figure 3 indicates that during the major conflicts of World Wars I and II, US bond yields were relatively stable.
"However, yields dipped in the months after both Gulf wars commenced and post 9/11 as investors initially sought the relative security of US government debt. Stable or lower bond yields suggest CRE should remain relatively attractive to investors. However, a reduction in CRE income through an economic slowdown could negatively impact demand.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal3.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
 <img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal3.png" alt="">
<h2>Australian GDP and conflict</h2>
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal4.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2017/09/11/Jagonal4.png" alt="">
"Tenant demand, vacancy and rental growth depends on economic growth.
"Figure 4 shows Australian GDP from 1900 to 2016 and indicates that the economy did suffer during prolonged periods of conflict.
"GDP falling by an average of 1.4% pa during World War I.
"Economic growth was more volatile during World War II.
"Initially dipping to 0.3% in 1939 and then experiencing strong growth averaging 8.2% pa from 1940 to 1943 before slipping to average -4.2% pa over 1944 and 1945.
"During the Korean War, GDP real growth averaged a solid 3.8% pa (but did dip to 0.9% in 1952) and averaged 4.4% during the Vietnam War (from the escalation of US participation in 1965 to 1975).
"As noted earlier, Australia suffered recessions in the early 1980s and 1990s that were more influenced by local factors than conflicts such as the Falklands and Gulf I wars. Since 1991, Australia has not experienced a recession, aided by our increased trade with China, while most other advanced economies were negatively impacted by the tech wreck, 9/11 and the GFC."
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Risk

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Risk

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News