Propertynews

<html><body>
The Australian Government should formulate a national housing strategy that sets clear directions for Australia’s housing sector, according to not-for-profit group National Seniors Australia.
In the submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, National Seniors also recommended the examination of all types of housing and issues associated with access, adequacy, affordability and security by utilising findings from the Inquiry on Homeownership, the Inquiry on Affordable Housing, the Federation Review and the Tax Review. 
"Outright homeownership has been falling for people aged 55 and over (39.7% in 2001 to 32.1% in 2011)meaning that a greater number of older Australians are either paying off mortgages during retirement or moving from homeowner-occupier into alternative forms of accommodation.
"Other reasons for a fall in homeownership amongst older Australians include loss of paid employment and significant life events such as divorce or losing a partner. 
"Research suggests that insecurity within the private rental market amongst older Australians has led to a shift to public housing.The Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI) has found that older public housing households are expected to increase from 87,940 in 2001 to 109,560 in 2016, an increase of 24 per cent.
"In the 85+ age group these are expected to increase by 155 per cent. 
"Furthermore, by 2026 the number of lower-income people aged 65 and over who are living in rental households (as homeownership falls) are projected to far exceed the supply capacity of the social housing system. 
"Census data from 2006 to 2011 shows a steady increase in the number of renters aged 55 and over in the private market."
National Seniors Australia recommends that the Australian Government, in collaboration with state and territory governments, examine tenancy regulations, rights and advice services.
The aim would be to deliver security and support for long-term renters; recognise that renting in the private market is a significant form of tenure for many Australians; and increase the attractiveness of this form of tenure for Australia’s long term housing needs. 
"Older renters experience significant anxiety linked to their security of rental tenure and many experience housing stress.Such housing stress is magnified due to rent increasing well above CPI and the insufficiency of Commonwealth Rent Assistance. 
"Renters face a number of disadvantages including forced moves which greatly contribute to instability. The frequency of moving between owners and renters in Australia is the highest in the OECD.
"The lack of long term (beyond 6-12 months) leases available to Australian renters increases instability.  
"Limiting the ability of property investors to terminate leases for ‘any reason with notice’ to a list of prescribed criteria, allowing pet ownership and minor alterations to the rental property would greatly enhance the lifestyle available to renters.  
"Improving the stability and security of tenure for a renter would provide them with the ability to receive similar non-financial benefits available to home owners.
"Creating greater equity in the Australian housing market would reduce the desire to become a homeowner, subsequently reducing the demand which is currently driving high housing prices in the market. 
"National Seniors recommends that the government investigate policies that will address barriers to downsizing (or 'rightsizing') for older Australians, for example, a national ‘rightsizing’ program. 
"Older Australians face barriers to relocating including: the inability to find value for money, stamp duty, moving costs, lack of suitable housing in familiar surroundings with easy access to required amenities, and impacts of selling the home on Age Pension eligibility. 
"These barriers also decrease capacity for older Australians to access equity in their home to assist with living costs during retirement. 
"Proceeds from the sale of the family home continue to remain exempt from the Age Pension assets test for up to 12 months, as long as the funds are intended to buy another home. 
"However, any interest earned on sale proceeds is counted under the income test, and, if a cheaper home is purchased, any surplus cash is included in the Age Pension asset test. 
"Concerns regarding the proceeds of the sale of the home being subject to the Age Pension assets test discourage 20 per cent of all seniors, and 30 per cent of Age Pensioners from selling the home.
"In 2013 the then Labor government announced the Supporting Senior Australians—housing help for seniors pilot,to address some of the barriers to downsizing that older Australians face. 
"The pilot exempted a portion of sale proceeds from the Age Pension asset test. However, it also applied restrictive conditions, including the requirement that a homeowner had to own their home for more than 25 years and quarantining the proceeds for ten years. 
"As an alternative National Seniors has called for the implementation of a ‘Rightsizing’ program that exempts up to $150,000 in proceeds from the sale of the home from the Age Pension income or asset test. 
"Excess sale funds could then go towards critical services, such as health costs, significantly reducing the burden on government-supported health systems. 
"The recent changes to the Age Pension asset test (legislated in June 2015) will provide an even greater deterrent for seniors to right-size. Reconsideration should be given to a program that allows seniors to right-size without the threat of future reductions to their Age Pension payments." 
National Seniors recommends that the states and territories provide concessional stamp duty to older Australians to encourage downsizing and maintenance of homeowner-occupier tenure. 
"A reduction in stamp duty would encourage older people to right-size their homes and improve quality of life, while also providing many younger Australians access to suitable family homes which would not otherwise be available."
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Seniors group calls for defined federal housing strategy

<html><body>
Reviews on negative gearing, CGT discounts, Self-managed super funds investing in residential property, foreign investment, and immigration levels are key opportunities for reform to improve home ownership in Australia, according to the Affordable Housing Party of Australia (AFHPA).
Phasing out tax advantages over a period of possibly 10 years is the mechanism suggested by AFHPA in their submission to the inquiry into Home Ownership. 
"Firstly, it is likely to encourage investors, especially long term investors, to release properties back onto the market to avoid increased capital gains tax. Hence we should see an increasing proportion of owner-occupiers within 3-5 years. 
"Secondly, as residential investment slowly becomes less tax effective there should be decline in investor interest and reducing prices over time.
"Hence the AFHPA would propose a gradual reduction on the favourable tax treatments to residential property investments.  
The AFHPA would also suggest that action be taken in the following areas:
"CGT discounts on residential property. In the first year after a change property investors would pay tax on 55% of capital gains made on property, the next year it might be, say 60% increasing each year until CGT is paid on 100% of the capital gain. 
"Increase CGT on Self-managed super funds (SMSF) investing in residential property.
"Similar arrangements would be made with SMSF however as the Federal Government has committed to a review of Superannuation the AFHPA will wait until this review is released before commenting on what the actual rate of taxation should be. 
"In the first year after a change in negative gearing investors would be allowed to claim 100% of losses on residential property against their pay as you earn tax obligations, in the second year it might be, say 90% etc."
End foreign investment in the residential property market by tightening rules pertaining to foreign investment in residential property to their pre 2008 level. 
"Because of its undoubted effect on house prices, there is an urgent need to review the current level of migration to Australia. The AHPA would encouragement the widest possible public debate before a final level of immigration was set.  
"However the AHPA position is that the current levels are unsustainable."
Demand and Supply Drivers in the Housing Market 
On the demand side, the AFHPA cites the generous tax treatment of investors in residential housing as a driver of demand and hence rising pricing in the residential property market.  
"AFHPA cites the reduction in CGT as the main driver in investor demand in the last decade. This can be seen in the increasing percentage of investor in the residential housing market since changes were made in CGT by the Howard Government in 1999. 
"Reduced CGT for residential property favours wealthier Australians. Wealthier Australians make more of their income through capital gains than poorer Australians; poorer Australians make their income through wages. 
"Reduced CGT favours Australians with excess funds that can be invested in the property market. In a similar vein the generous treatment of funds in an S.M.S.F. advantages investors over owner-occupiers. 
"However, the AFHPA also submits that negative gearing on residential property is also very ineffective. The bulk of investors using negative gearing have purchased existing properties, hence there can be no argument that negative gearing adds to the supply of housing. 
"The fact that SMSFs are allowed to included residential property further increases demand again without increasing supply. 
"Migration is not often mentioned in regard to housing affordability. The current level of immigration is one of the highest in the OECD and this increases demand in a limited market and hence puts upwards pressure on housing prices. 
"Australia now has a business migration program where applicants for immigration are selected on their financial status. The basic idea being these applicants will have funds to invest in Australia. 
"To date the AFHPA knows of no economic study as to where these funds are being invested. If the funds brought to Australia are being invested in the residential property market, then this doubly affects housing affordability. 
"Finally, investment in existing residential property does little to improve the economic position of Australia. 
"Effectively what is happening is Australia is repricing its existing assets, no real wealth is being created. Wealth is simply being transferred from one generation to the other. 
"The funds invested in property could be better applied to other areas. Although State Governments improve their budgets positions through increased stamp duty and lending organisations make greater profits as housing prices rise, but this is not wealth creation." 
</body></html>

Wind back on favourable tax for residential property investors: AFHPA

<html><body>
The Onthehouse property website, which will include the Residex data base founded by John Edwards, has been bought by CoreLogic RP Data.
OTH's consumer online division (Onthehouse.com.au, Residex and REAN, the Real Estate Ad Network) fetched $3 million.
The stockmarket listed Onthehouse Group’s strategy is now solely focused on its real estate software division.
"The board believes the business is now funded to grow Console’s real estate software products market share and leverage new revenue opportunities through integrating or building other services to real estate agents and their clients."
Earlier this year it was signalled the property website was set to be shut down after its board ended negotiations with realestateVIEW just before contracts were due to be signed on the national price data base. 
"In the absence of a sale agreement for the Onthehouse.com.au and media businesses, they will be closed by April 2016 at an estimated closure cost of circa $1.7 million," the ontheouse company said in a statement to the ASX earlier this year. 
No white knight emerged until today.
Residex was initially intended to be retained in the envisaged remaining restructure, having been forecast to deliver revenues of more than $2 million in FY16 and to operate at a break even position going forward.
It was 2012 when Onthehouse acquired the last tranche to own 100% of property data business Residex.
Onthehouse acquired a half-share in May 2011.
The second 50% of Residex cost onthehouse $3.5 million.
Residex was founded by John Edwards in 1990 to to develop house price indices for the NSW state government and has since added expanded historical residential data, suburb reports and valuation reports to its national mix of products and services.
Residex hold more than 350 million records provided to the property industry and the public dating back to 1865.
Following the sale of COD division announced today, the onthehouse company’s cash position has materially improved through the lower COD exit costs.
The estimated but now avoided cost announced in February to close the business was $1.7 million.
The estimated cost to the company to exit COD has now been revised to $1.5 million which includes professional fees on the sale of COD.
The company’s cash position is $3.2 million better off than previously expected under a COD shutdown scenario.
The group chief Chris Meehan advised discussions with the Macquarie Group hostile takeover consortium are continuing.
"Onthehouse will continue to keep the market informed in accordance with its continuous disclosure obligations," said Chris Meehan.
The takeover consortium included CoreLogic RP Data.
 
 
 
</body></html>

Propertynews

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Propertynews

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News