Power Station

<html><body>
<div class="heading">
The heritage-listed former East Perth Power Station is set to be transformed into “an iconic mixed-use waterfront precinct,” following the WA government’s announcement of the preferred proponents to develop the site. 
</div>
<div class="content">
<div id="project">
Australian Capital Equity, the private investment arm of broadcaster Kerry Stokes and Minderoo Group, backed by mining magnate Andrew Forrest, were chosen from a shortlist of five proponents from a competitive process.
Located on the Swan River, the 8.5-hectare site will be transformed into a new residential, commercial, recreational and tourism precinct in the first stage of development over the next four years. Kerry Hill Architects has prepared concept designs for the proposed $218 million development.
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131528" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_03-interior.jpg">
<source data-srcset="https://media5.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/e4/ed/e4edfed15f44908574579ec5481ba66a.webp" type="image/webp" srcset="https://media5.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/e4/ed/e4edfed15f44908574579ec5481ba66a.webp"></source><img class="['full'] full lazyloaded" src="https://media2.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/23/88/238841d37b6e88af7e3c37a8f19df502.jpg" alt="Concept design for the transformation of the former East Perth Power Station by Kerry Hill Architects." width="728" height="485" data-src="https://media2.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/23/88/238841d37b6e88af7e3c37a8f19df502.jpg">
</div>
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131528" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_03-interior.jpg"> </div>
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131528" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_03-interior.jpg">Concept design for the transformation of the former East Perth Power Station by Kerry Hill Architects. </div>
The project will also include a variety of public spaces and a “living gallery” experience to showcase Aboriginal art as well as the state’s mining and resources industry.
The former East Perth Power Station occupies land that is significant to the local Whadjuk Noongar people. The state government says the traditional owners will be engaged with through Development WA’s Kaart Koort Waarnginy (Head Heart Talking) Framework. The development will also be named “Koomba Kalark,” which translates to “the place of the big fire.”
The development will also complement the nearby <a href="https://architectureau.com/articles/optus-stadium/" target="_blank">Optus Stadium</a> designed by Hassell, Cox and HKS and <a href="https://architectureau.com/articles/first-walk-completed-across-perths-matagarup-bridge/" target="_blank">Matagarup Bridge</a> by Denton Corker Marshall. 
WA premier Mark McGowan said, “This announcement marks a significant milestone in the revitalization of one of our iconic landmarks, the old East Perth Power Station. This kind of project has been talked about for years, and now it’s finally coming to fruition.”
The government has chipped in $50 million to prepare the site for development.
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131527" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_04-exterior.jpg">
<source data-srcset="https://media5.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/e6/25/e625d2c8028f2ad9722a1b4ef34b0e52.webp" type="image/webp" srcset="https://media5.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/e6/25/e625d2c8028f2ad9722a1b4ef34b0e52.webp"></source><img class="['full'] full lazyloaded" src="https://media3.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/56/23/5623b969cf59f90b8a00f7ef8d94a3da.jpg" alt="Concept design for the transformation of the former East Perth Power Station by Kerry Hill Architects." width="728" height="437" data-src="https://media3.architecturemedia.net/site_media/media/cache/56/23/5623b969cf59f90b8a00f7ef8d94a3da.jpg">
</div>
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131527" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_04-exterior.jpg"> </div>
<div class="image has-slide" data-imgid="131527" data-sr="files/image_upload_2018-2019/epps_191216_04-exterior.jpg">Concept design for the transformation of the former East Perth Power Station by Kerry Hill Architects.</div>
The East Perth Power Station has had a more than 100-year history and is one of the WA’s most significant industrial sites. It was constructed in 1916 and remained in continuous operation until 1968. 
According the state heritage register, “the place is rare as a large-scale thermal power station retaining its plant and equipment, constructed prior to the end of World War One, being one of only two such places in Australia.” 
It is also “a good example of a complex of utilitarian industrial structures, featuring distinctive interior spatial quality in the station turbine rooms with some Art Deco detailing.” 
In February 2008, the then Labor state government announced plans to transform the site into a $500 million museum, similar to the Powerhouse Museum in Sydney and Tate Modern in London. Later that year following the state election the new government led by Liberal premier Colin Barnett abandoned the plan and instead chose to build a <a href="https://architectureau.com/articles/hassell-and-oma-blend-old-and-new-in-new-wa-museum/" target="_blank">new museum</a> at the site of the existing WA Museum in Northbridge.
In 2015, the state government sought expressions of interest to develop the site into “an iconic, mixed-use waterfront destination.”
A number of proposals emerged, including proposals to turn the former power station into a farmers market, a World Trade Centre as well as Hassell-designed concept to create an art gallery and performance hall. That design, inspired by the jagged cliffs of the WA coastline, sought to create a building of rotating and shifting plank. Hassell received an award from the Chicago Athenaeum Museum of Architecture and Design <a href="https://architectureau.com/articles/australian-projects-win-at-2016-international-architecture-awards/" target="_blank">in 2016</a> for the unbuilt project.
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Concept designs unveiled for East Perth Power Station transformation

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/67773/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
The ongoing uncertainty over the future of the Hazelwood power station in Victoria’s Latrobe Valley has raised the prospect that the ageing generator will be shut down in the near future. 
The power station has a nameplate capacity of 1.6 gigawatts, which represents 22 percent of the coal-fired generation capacity in Victoria, and 6% of the total coal-fired capacity in Victoria, Queensland and New South Wales combined (South Australia no longer has an operating coal-fired power station).
Coal-fired power stations provide the bulk of the “baseload” electricity requirements in the National Electricity Market (NEM). Baseload refers to generation that meets the minimum demand, and from an economic point of view this is best delivered by generation that produces constant, reliable output. Brown coal provides the cheapest baseload power – or at least, it does if we’re prepared to ignore factors such as the long-term costs of climate change.
So if Hazelwood departs the market, as one of the cheapest generators in the NEM, it seems logical that electricity prices will increase. The extent of that increase will depend on what takes up the slack. So what can we expect to happen?
<h2>On the decline</h2>
Until 2007, average electricity demand in the NEM had increased every year since the grid was first built. But after that demand started to fall. The reasons are varied, including increasing takeup of rooftop solar panels, improved efficiency of lighting and appliances, and reductions in industrial demand. 
Looking at July (when baseload electricity demand is typically at its highest), the average demand has fallen from 25.4GW in July 2007 to 22.9GW in July 2016, a reduction of 2.5GW. 
But there has also been significant retirement of coal-fired generation capacity in Australia since 2010, driven partly by the retirement of old power plants, and partly by the costs associated with the carbon price, which ran from 2012 to 2014. 
The retirees include Morwell and Anglesea in Victoria (0.2GW), Playford B and Northern in South Australia (0.8GW), and most significantly Redbank, Wallerawang and Munmorah in New South Wales (2.5 GW). This adds up to a total of 3.5GW of coal-fired capacity shut down this decade.
This means that more capacity has been retired than the baseload demand has decreased. So in theory, the retirement of another baseload power station at Hazelwood would result in even more tightening of the balance between supply and demand. 
But if we look at the current average capacity factors of the remaining coal-fired power stations we can see that many of the larger ones, in NSW in particular, are running at very modest capacities. For example, Liddell has been running at 43% of its total capacity for the past 12 months, and Eraring at 59%. Across the NEM the average is 65%. 
Now, of course some of this generation is used when the demand increases during particularly hot or cold weather, but most of this “peaking” demand is supplied by hydro and gas. So while baseload is not the only way to meet demand in the energy system, there nevertheless seems to be plenty of baseload available.
Why are coal-fired stations running at such low levels? One reason is that while demand has been falling, there has also been an extra 4GW of wind power capacity added to the grid. Meanwhile, several new plants were commissioned in the years leading up to the peak in demand, with the expectation that demand would continue to rise. These plants include Callide C, Millmerran and Kogan Creek, which add up to 2.7GW.
If Hazelwood shuts down, it would be reasonable to expect that the remaining coal-fired generators in the grid will take up the slack. The generators in Victoria are running at relatively high capacity factors, so we might expect that NSW generators will increase their output. The interconnector between Victoria and NSW currently sends Victorian electricity into NSW, but it can reverse that flow if required.
One reason why Victorian power stations are running at higher capacities is because they are cheaper to run. ACIL Tasman figures from 2010 show short-run marginal cost (the cost to run a power station in addition to fixed costs) in Victoria is around A$2-5 per megawatt hour, compared with A$12-17 per MWh in NSW.
Predicting what will happen to electricity prices in the future is harder than picking the winner of the Melbourne Cup, so making an exact price forecast is tricky. But if the hole left by Hazelwood’s retirement is filled by the excess capacity in NSW, then all things being equal the impacts on the overall costs of running the system would be modest.
Still, the NEM is very complex. Generators (especially in Victoria) are privately owned and will adjust their market strategies to take advantage of the tightening of supply. Meanwhile, the growing market share of renewables, the potential for electricity demand to begin rising once again, and the possibility of further coal closures, all mean that the full impact of the retreat of coal-fired power is yet to be seen.
Roger Dargaville is deputy director, Melbourne Energy Institute, University of Melbourne and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/roger-dargaville-1832" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Hazelwood’s closure won’t affect power prices as much as you might think

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The Urban Taskforce believes rejected private sector proposals to redevelop Sydney's White Bay Power Station reduces confidence in the private and public partnership process.
Urban Taskforce chief executive officer Chris Johnson said after 13 teams have spent millions of dollars in good faith the whole process has been cancelled.
“It would appear that the brief was just too restrictive with the requirement to only house technology companies while restoring a decaying heritage building and to somehow fund this from very limited new development," he said.
“The large development companies in NSW have previously had two rounds of proposals for the central area of Barangaroo cancelled and with the termination of the White Bay proposal process, tens of millions of dollars have been wasted.
“There is also much confusion around the White Bay site about the impact of WestConnex and future public transport options. This lack of clarity increases the risk to the private sector in preparing proposals but it is very unfair to use this as an excuse in rejecting all proposals.
“It now appears that UrbanGrowth NSW were premature in calling for private sector proposals and too restrictive with their brief.” 
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

 White Bay Power Station brief 'too restrictive': Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
The NSW government's White Bay Power Station redevelopment in Sydney's inner-west has attracted 13 proposals.
The size of the offering, and decision to offer it substantially in one line, meant few bidders have any real prospect of securing the site.
Lendlease, who have teamed with Google, head the list after the first round of the sale closed last week.
Mirvac, which last year won the $1 billion Australian Technology Park development against stiff competition, also submitted a proposal.
And the Australian Financial Review noted a university consortium, headed by UTS and the UNSW, has maintained its interest.
The chief executive of UrbanGrowth NSW, David Pitchford, even dismissed the suggestion that a deal had been already struck with Lendlease and Google.
"We have 13 proposals from all over the world and the standard is very high," he said, although not bidding included Stockland, Brookfield and Grocon and international heavyweights like the China-based Aqualand, Dalian Wanda and Greenland.
UrbanGrowth is managing the process with sales assistance from Knight Frank.
The site has potential for mixed-use development, but involves serious expenses in remediation, transport infrastructure and restoration.
</body></html>

Power Station

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Power Station

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News