Monetary Policy

Last week we received further confirmation that the Australian economy is recovering well, and better than expected

The recovery, investment and monetary policy of Australia: RBA's Philip Lowe

<html><body>
<div>Australia's banks are mostly funded by domestic deposit these days, at nearly 60 percent of their funding composition.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Equity accounts for a fair share of the remainder too. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>But what about their debt funding costs?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Last week's Statement on Monetary Policy took a short look at this. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>And the answer is that debt funding costs have kept on falling in 2016.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>And what's more they will continue to do so in the near future. </div>
<div> </div>
<div><a href="/images/2016/11/07/RBA1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></div>
<div> </div>
<div class="separator"><img src="/images/2016/11/07/RBA1.jpg" alt=""></div>
<div class="separator"> </div>
<div><span>After cuts to the cash rate May and August, the major banks’ debt funding costs also declined. </span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>The cost of short-term debt is now under 2 per cent (down from well above 6 per cent in 2007).</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>Meanwhile, the marginal cost of long-term debt is a bit above 3 per cent.</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>It is true that since the beginning of the year, these costs have declined by a little less than the cash rate.</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>This was mainly because of changes to term deposit rates. </span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>But overall the difference was not material.</span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div><span>And now funding costs are expected to fall further, since the cost of new wholesale debt remains below the cost of outstanding debt. </span></div>
<div><span> </span></div>
<div>
<div>
<p><span><em>PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of <a href="https://allenwargent.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">AllenWargent</a> property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">blogger</a>.</em><br></span></p>
<p><em>His latest book is <a href="https://www.bigskypublishing.com.au/Books/General-Interest/Four-Green-Houses--and-a-Red-Hotel/1015/productview.aspx" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Four Green Houses and a Red Hotel</a>.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Funding costs keep falling: Pete Wargent

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column"><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">GUEST OBSERVATION</span></div>
<div class="column"><span style="line-height: 1.3em;"> </span></div>
<div class="column">
<p><span>The Minutes from the RBA’s July board meeting contained little new indication on the evolution of monetary policy, although they suggest that the Bank continues to holds a mild easing bias.</span></p>
<span style="line-height: 1.3em;">The points of interest in the Minutes were around Q2 growth and the labour market:</span>
</div>
<div class="column"><span style="line-height: 1.3em;"> </span></div>
<div class="column">
<ul>
<li><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">On the labour market, the Board noted the recent improvement in the data. They did, however, note that softer population growth had helped to keep a lid on the unemployment rate despite below-average growth in GDP, with workers leaving the mining states of Queensland and Western Australia where growth is weakest. They also noted the mixed outlook for labour demand indicated by the various forward indicators. These comments suggest to us that while the Bank would clearly be pleased if the peak in the unemployment rate does not prove to be as high as previously thought, it seems unlikely to change its view that the unemployment rate is likely to stay elevated for some time.</span></li>
<li><span style="line-height: 1.3em;">On growth, the Minutes noted that the strength in Q1 (when GDP rose a solid 0.9% q/q) had not carried through to Q2. The monthly trade data suggest resources exports declined in the quarter (our preliminary calculations point to a small net exports subtraction) while non-mining business investment remains subdued. They did, however, point out the improvement in recent months in business conditions (note that conditions have improved further since this meeting).</span></li>
</ul>
<p><span>The comments on the currency were broadly unchanged with members noting that “further depreciation seemed both likely and necessary”.</span></p>
<p><span>Of more interest will be Governor Glenn Stevens’ speech tomorrow which is on the topic of ‘Issues in economic policy’. Given his recent rhetoric, we think he is likely to reiterate or expand on issues on monetary policy transmission and the government’s role in infrastructure spending.</span></p>
</div>
<div class="column">
<p><span>The full text of the Minutes can be found <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/monetary-policy/rba-board-minutes/2015/2015-07-07"><span>here</span></a>. </span></p>
<p><span>Felicity Emmett is co-head of Australian economics, ANZ Research and can be contacted <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://au.linkedin.com/pub/felicity-emmett/5a/3ba/256"><span>here</span></a>.</span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

po-LsXgBTHBmX

July 2015 RBA minutes – still dovish: ANZ

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

How the global picture affects the economic outlook and monetary policy: RBA Governor Philip Lowe

<html><body>
<p>EXPERT OBSERVER</p>
<p>The Reserve Bank has released its quarterly Statement on Monetary Policy (SMP). The two key areas of most interest in the Statement are around further policy insights and the RBA’s growth, unemployment and inflation outlook.</p>
<p>The discussion on policy was particularly interesting. The Overview for the Statement, which we expect largely reflects the Governor’s own views, provides the most open analysis of policy options that we have seen. In outlining the policy decision in October, the Overview noted “the Board was mindful that rates were already very low and that each further cut brings closer the point at which other policy options come into play”. This represents a more open approach to the discussion around unconventional policies. To date, that discussion has been characterised by comments such as “unlikely”, whereas this wording indicates almost an automatic move from cash rate policy to other policy options. To be sure, there is no firm commitment to move in that direction but the wording indicates that such a transition to other options may be considered to be a normal approach to policy.</p>
<p>Other issues around a very low cash rate, including that it may “unintentionally convey an overly negative view of the economic outlook” and “the usual channels of policy transmission might be less effective”, also signal that the cash rate cut cycle is nearing an end. That said, lower rates are seen as having some impact. Indeed, the usual channels of lower exchange rate and boosting household disposable income are pointed out. However, a new channel, “higher asset prices”, has been added to the list. Arguably, given that Sydney and Melbourne house prices bottomed out in May, the June and July rate cuts played a significant role in turning those markets. It is of some interest that the SMP highlights this channel as a constructive aspect of interest rate policy.</p>
<p>Commentary on the current policy position signals that rates are almost certain to remain on hold at the December Board meeting. Since the decision in November was part of a plan to allow time to assess the effects of the recent easing of monetary policy as well as global developments, no doubt the RBA’s observation that the low point in global pessimism may have passed is an important aspect of the current policy standing.</p>
<p>On balance, Westpac believes that its assessment that with the unemployment rate still well above the RBA’s target (4.5%) and the RBA seeing that there is a balance between the benefits and costs of lower rates, our view that 0.5% is the effective lower bound and that some transition to unconventional policies is likely is supported by this SMP.</p>
<p>The second point of interest in the SMP is around the RBA’s forecasts. As we anticipated in our preview to this SMP, the key growth forecasts for 2020 of 2.8% which was adopted in August, has been retained in this SMP. That is much higher than Westpac’s forecast of 2.4%. Surprisingly, the forecast in November includes a more optimistic outlook for dwelling construction for 2020 (-2.6%, upgraded from -3.3%) and business investment (+6.2% upgraded from +5.8%). Partially offsetting that more optimistic view is the lowering in growth of public demand from +3.2% to +2.9%. These forecasts for 2020 contrasts with Westpac’s forecast of 2.4% for GDP growth, -6% for dwelling investment, and +2.8% for business investment. Overall, Westpac’s forecast for growth in GNE of 2.3% in 2020 compares to 2.8% from the RBA. Looking further out, the RBA has retained its optimistic growth forecast for 2021 of 3.1% compared to our forecast of 2.7% with a substantial part of the difference being explained by the RBA seeing a much more rapid recovery in the dwelling investment cycle.</p>
<p>This substantial difference between Westpac and the RBA on the construction cycle partly hinges around the link between established house prices and construction activity. Furthermore, even the RBA points out that the current expected pipeline of construction may be overstating actual activity.</p>
<p>There have been some modest downward revisions to the inflation and wages outlook. Even though the unemployment rate profile of 5.2% in December 2020 and 4.9% by December 2021 is unchanged from August, wages growth for December 2021 has been cut from 2.4% to 2.3% (“wages growth is no longer expected to pick up”) and growth in the trimmed mean inflation measure has been cut from 2.1% to 1.9%. It must be particularly uncomfortable for the RBA to be forecasting that underlying and headline inflation will remain below the bottom of the 2-3% target band right out into 2021.</p>
<p>Readers will be aware that on November 6, Westpac advocated the bringing forward of the legislated personal income tax cuts, which had been timed for June 2022, to June 2020 and June 2021 (evenly distributed). If the Federal Government were to take up that policy option, then Westpac’s forecasts for consumer spending, housing activity and business investment will be lifted.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p>
<p>The November SMP provides the clearest insight yet into the RBA’s thinking about policy in 2020. The acceptance that, after rates reach a certain threshold, other policy options “might come into play” is quite significant. The recognition that asset prices are an additional channel of monetary policy and are assessed to be a positive channel is also important.</p>
<p>The overview of the RBA’s growth outlook, while largely unchanged from August, still appears to be overly optimistic, particularly around the residential construction cycle and business investment. On the other hand, the downbeat view on wages, inflation and the unemployment rate make it clear that the RBA does not believe that its job is done and so we can expect further policy action from the RBA in 2020. Westpac continues to expect the RBA to cut to 0.50% in February 2020 and to move to unconventional policies at an appropriate time.</p>
<p><em><strong>BILL EVANS</strong> is the Chief Economist at Westpac</em></p>
</body></html>

bevans-rYk9SxEa4r

RBA openly discusses the risks from very low rates: Bill Evans

<html><body>
<p>EXPERT OBSERVATION</p>
<p>In its quarterly statement on monetary policy, released today, the Reserve Bank of Australia declared its preparedness to “ease monetary policy further if needed”.</p>
<p>This suggests the bank still thinks monetary policy – in this case lowering interest rates to stimulate the economy – could help “support sustainable growth in the economy, full employment and the achievement of the medium-term inflation target”.</p>
<p>But in the wake of the bank last month lowering the official interest rate to a record low and the current somewhat sad state of the Australian economy, <a href="https://www.afr.com/policy/economy/monetary-policy-has-run-its-race-costello-20191015-p530ys" target="_blank">many commentators</a> have speculated that <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/monetary-policy/" target="_blank">monetary policy</a> doesn’t work any more.</p>
<p><strong>Is that right?</strong></p>
<p>Reserve Bank cash rate</p>
<p><a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/294952/original/file-20191001-173393-1b2cjw9.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/294952/original/file-20191001-173393-1b2cjw9.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip" alt=""></a></p>
<p><a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/statistics/cash-rate/" target="_blank">Source: RBA</a></p>
<p>There are a number of variants of the “monetary policy doesn’t work” argument. The most basic is that the Reserve Bank has this year cut rates from 1.50% to 0.75% without any improvement to the Australian economy.</p>
<p>This is a textbook example of one of the classic logic fallacies known as “<a href="https://www.britannica.com/topic/fallacy#ref1102390" target="_blank">post hoc ergo propter hoc</a>” (from the Latin, meaning “after this, therefore because of this”).</p>
<p>Put simply, it assumes the rate cuts have had no effect and doesn’t account for the possibility things might have been worse had there been no cuts.</p>
<p>Things might have been even worse. We’ll never know.</p>
<p>It also ignores what might have happened if the RBA had cut sooner. Again, we can’t know for sure. It is possible, though, to make an educated guess.</p>
<p><strong>When to cut rates</strong></p>
<p>Had Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe acted, say, 18 months earlier to cut rates, he would have signalled that Gross Domestic Product growth was indeed lower than desired, that the sustainable rate of unemployment was more like 4.5% than 5%, and, most importantly, that he understood the need to act decisively.</p>
<p>That would have sent a powerful signal.</p>
<p>It would also have ameliorated the huge decline in housing credit that pushed down housing prices in Sydney and Melbourne by double digits.</p>
<p>That, in turn, would have prevented some of the weakening in the balance sheets of the big four banks that has occurred (witness this annual general meeting season).</p>
<p>All of this would have pumped more liquidity into the economy and put households in a much stronger position, likely leading to stronger consumer spending than we have seen.</p>
<p><strong>Bank pass through</strong></p>
<p>One gripe both the Reserve Bank governor Philip Lowe and federal treasurer Josh Frydenberg have had with the banks is their <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-10-14/josh-frydenberg-asks-accc-to-investigate-banking-sector/11598614" target="_blank">failure to fully pass through the RBA cuts</a>.</p>
<p><a href="https://theconversation.com/four-questions-about-mortgages-the-accc-inquiry-should-put-to-the-big-four-banks-125224" target="_blank">It is true there is a problem</a> with banks not being able to cut deposit rates below zero, and as a result having less scope to cut mortgage rates, which are majority funded from deposits.</p>
<p>But there are, of course, other ways monetary policy can work. The leading example is quantitative easing (QE).</p>
<p>This is where the central bank pushes down long-term interest rates by buying government and corporate bonds. At the same time this expands the money supply, thereby adding some upward inflationary pressure.</p>
<p>There is <a href="https://theconversation.com/below-zero-is-reverse-how-the-reserve-bank-would-make-quantitative-easing-work-118843" target="_blank">little reason</a> to think such measures wouldn’t work.</p>
<p><strong>The power of free money</strong></p>
<p>Perhaps paradoxically, the closer interest rates get to zero the more powerful those rates may end up being.</p>
<p>To put it bluntly, if someone shoves a pile of money into your hand and asks almost nothing in return, you’re likely to use it. In fact, you would be pretty silly not to.</p>
<p>Suppose your mortgage rate really goes to zero – as <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-13/european-central-bank-ecb-cut-rates-negative-record-low/11508704" target="_blank">has happened in Europe</a>.</p>
<p>You might decide to redraw that and spend the money on a home renovation or some other productive purpose. Or you might decide to buy a more expensive house.</p>
<p>Such spending provides an economic boost.</p>
<p>The effect is all the more pronounced if people expect interest rates to be low for a long period of time. Aggressive cutting coupled with quantitative easing – which lowers long-term rates – signal just that.</p>
<p><strong>But not only monetary policy</strong></p>
<p>Just because monetary policy still has some effect at near-zero rates doesn’t mean we should pin all of our economic hopes to it.</p>
<p>A near consensus of economists have argued repeatedly for the use of more aggressive fiscal policy – including more infrastructure spending and more tax cuts.</p>
<p>Indeed, Philip Lowe has raised eyebrows by <a href="https://www.rba.gov.au/speeches/2019/sp-gov-2019-08-09" target="_blank">speaking so forthrightly</a> on this issue. That doesn’t make him wrong, though.</p>
<p>There is little doubt the Reserve Bank should have acted much earlier to cut official interest rates. There is also a very good chance it will need to begin to use other measures such as quantitative easing in the relatively near future.</p>
<p>All of that says the Australian economy, like most advanced economies around the world, is in bad shape.</p>
<p>But it doesn’t mean monetary policy has completely run out of puff.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/126579/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1"></p>
<p><a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/richard-holden-118107" target="_blank">Richard Holden</a>, Professor of Economics, <a href="http://theconversation.com/institutions/unsw-1414" target="_blank">UNSW</a></p>
<p>This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/vital-signs-does-monetary-policy-work-any-more-126579" target="_blank">original article</a>.</p>
</body></html>

Monetary Policy

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Monetary Policy

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News