Mark Armstrong

<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
I believe the answer to improving affordability lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first home buyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
MARK ARMSTRONG is a director of <a href="https://ratemyagent.com.au/" target="_blank">ratemyagent.com.au</a>, Australia’s number one real estate agent rating website.
This article was originally published on Property Observer in October 2013.
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

Allowing first home buyers access to super is the answer to the affordability dilemma

<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
But laws around negative gearing and super are unlikely to change so it’s time to revisit the issue.
I believe the answer lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
 A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
<blockquote>
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite.
</blockquote>
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first homebuyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
This article was first published on Property Observer in October, 2013.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ:
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=4lSOU9OGBoLh8AWz04LoBw&amp;ved=0CAoQFjAC&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNEsLTG_yhrdXMWc6K0tUs4ExH4zkg" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts.html">Exclusive: First home buyer picks from the experts</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/forward-planning/investment-strategy/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=4lSOU9OGBoLh8AWz04LoBw&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAI&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNGpdo7JW0MfB1BezFddwp63td8zaA" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/forward-planning/investment-strategy/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers.html">How will rising student debt affect first home buyers?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=B1WOU4udC5Pf8AXF_YDYDg&amp;ved=0CAYQFjAA&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNFHQorVTsJrTVRgPVX0IFEiP5Ph8w" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants.html">The national guide to first home buyer grants</a>
</body></html>

It's time to re-think first home buyer grants

<html><body>
You’re sitting around a table with friends one night, downing a couple of glasses of red. The conversation turns to property investment, and how hard it is to get into the market. Emboldened by the wine, someone suggests beating the affordability barrier by pooling your resources and buying a property together.
In principle, it’s a great idea. By clubbing together, you’ll be able to afford a better quality investment property than you could as individuals. What’s more, your individual share of the mortgage is likely to be smaller than if you’d purchased on your own, which gives you more room to breathe financially.
Buying with friends can work well — provided that everyone has clear and consistent expectations before entering into the arrangement. It’s wise to draft a written agreement covering the key aspects and likely eventualities of the arrangement. You can do this yourselves, however it can be a complex undertaking so it may be best to see a solicitor with a specialist knowledge of contracts.
One of the most important considerations the agreement should cover is how long you intend to hold the property. Is this a short-term proposition, e.g. three to five years, or a long-term commitment?
<blockquote>
Remember, if you're planning on buying with friends you are entering a business deal, not a social arrangement.
</blockquote>
Ideally, you should hold residential investment property for at least seven to 10 years to ride out market fluctuations and make the most of compound capital growth. However, even with the best of intentions, unforeseen changes in the lives of the owners means there may come a time when it’s no longer appropriate or viable for one of them to continue the arrangement.
For this reason, the written agreement should address a range of possible life changes. For example, what will happen when one owner wants to sell their share of the property and free up funds to buy a home of their own to live in, start a family, or return to full-time study? What if one owner wants to buy the others out? How will the price be determined? What will happen if one owner loses their job, can’t work due to illness or injury, or dies?
The agreement should cover the dollar amount each person will commit to the investment, and the ownership split in percentage terms. It’s also worth including a reference to the terms of the contract you and your friends have with the lender. If you are borrowing money for the purchase, the lender will consider each of you ‘jointly and severally liable’ for the debt.
In other words, if one of you is unable to meet your repayments, the lender can hold the other borrowers liable for your share of the debt, and can take action to recover it from them.
To minimise this risk, each borrower should take out the relevant insurances such as life insurance and income protection insurance which will help cover their financial commitments in the event of illness, injury or death.
Your agreement should also detail nuts-and-bolts issues such as who will have responsibility for day-to-day management of the property.
Who will deal with the lender or broker, liaise with the property manager and (if relevant) Body Corporate? Who will ensure that council rates bills, insurance premiums and maintenance fees are paid on time and in full? If you have to make an insurance claim and you find out your policy has lapsed, no-one wants to hear the fateful words: “I thought you were handling that.”
The written agreement should also detail the procedure to be followed if there is a dispute amongst the owners. Whilst this may sound a little rigid or over-the-top (after all, you wouldn’t be buying with them if you didn’t think you could resolve problems) it’s important to look at the agreement in the cold light of day.
Remember: you are entering a business deal, not a social arrangement. The shared values and common interests that bind you together as friends won’t necessarily translate to a business environment.
When you buy with friends, you may benefit initially by spending less than you would on your own, but you also carry a greater risk of the venture failing due to conflicting expectations about managing change.
There’s little point risking a friendship over money—so for everyone’s sake, agree on the terms of the deal, put it in writing and then get on with business. This way, you’ll not only stand to gain financially, but maintain your friendship as well. 
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
</body></html>

Buying with friends: A good idea in principle, but can it work in practice?

<html><body>
Think about the people you know who have bought investment properties. Chances are that at least one of them claims to have bought their property ‘below market value’.
Strictly speaking, it’s impossible to buy below market value, because a property’s market value is ultimately determined by one thing: the price you pay for it. When someone says they’ve bought below market value, what they really mean is that they purchased the asset for a lower price than other properties in the area, or that they bought it at a lower price than would have been possible six or 12 months previously.
Let’s take the first scenario. If you buy a property for less than others in the area are worth, that doesn’t mean you’ve secured a bargain. It may just mean you’ve bought a second-class asset. For example, if other properties in the area have sold for around $450,000, but you buy one for $400,000, perhaps its value has been compromised by a poor structural condition or noisy main road location.
Under the second scenario, buying a property for less than it would previously have been worth doesn’t necessarily mean that you have bought well. It could simply mean that property values in the area are declining. There are two possible reasons for this. First, there’s less demand than supply. In this situation, vendors are competing strongly for the attention of fewer buyers, so they’re more likely to discount their asking price.
If you buy into a market like this, it’s vital to ask yourself two questions: how much more will prices fall, and how long will it be until the trend reverses? In other words, how much money will you have to lose, and for how long, until your asset starts working for you?
The second possible reason for buying a property for less than its previous market value is that the asset has a low land-to-asset ratio – in other words, the building makes up the bulk of the asset’s value.
Land appreciates (grows) in value, whilst buildings depreciate. If you buy a property for less than its original sale value, chances are that the building’s value is falling faster than the land’s value is growing.
The net result? An asset that will continue to lose value after you’ve purchased it, until all the depreciation has been used up. Meanwhile, you’re paying holding costs like interest, rates and maintenance, on a property that’s delivering nothing in return.
Instead of buying property that is cheap and will remain so because of poor location or high depreciation, focus instead on researching the market to identify properties that represent good investment value.
What does this mean?
First, it refers to the quality of the asset. Properties in established areas with adequate infrastructure like public transport, shopping precincts and leisure facilities tend to have a limited supply of properties in the face of strong demand from investors, home buyers and tenants alike. This supply–demand ratio increases land value and improves capital growth potential.
Second, good investment value means researching the local market to find out the recent sale prices for properties of comparable land size, number of bedrooms and degree of renovation. Once you have determined what you believe is the property’s fair value as an investment asset, stick to that limit and walk away if the bidding or negotiation goes beyond it. Overpaying never represents good investment value, no matter how high the asset’s quality.
It’s true that high quality assets generally cost more than poor ones, so if your research shows that you may be priced out of a certain type of property, it’s better to compromise on the size of the accommodation (e.g. two bedrooms instead of three) rather than the location.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
</body></html>

Buying ‘below market value’: What it really means

<html><body>
Congratulations — you’re having a baby! Your head will be full of plans for medical check ups, baby names, cots and prams.
In the midst of all the excitement, there’s one issue many expectant parents overlook. If you’re taking leave from paid employment to be with your child, how will this affect your finances? Will you be able to afford your mortgage and other living expenses, or will you need to reshuffle the deckchairs?
All too often, parents leave these considerations until after the baby is born, their income is significantly lower, and they’re struggling to meet their commitments.
That’s why, after you’ve called your family and friends to break the good news, it’s important to contact your lender, broker or financial adviser and put plans in place to ensure you can fund your new lifestyle.
<blockquote>
All too often, parents leave these considerations until after the baby is born, their income is significantly lower, and they’re struggling to meet their commitments.
</blockquote>
If you have a mortgage and think your finances may be stretched, speak with your adviser about reducing your repayment amount. It’s particularly important to do this well ahead of your baby’s birth, because — regardless of whether you’re varying the terms of an existing loan or changing to a different one — lenders use a ‘snapshot’ approach when assessing your application.
This means you must present yourself and your finances in the best possible light — which is why the best time to apply is when you’re still earning the maximum possible income, not after the birth when your income has dropped substantially. The last thing you need on top of sleep deprivation and wet nappies is to be forced back to work early because of financial pressure!
There are several ways to reduce your repayment amount.
Extend your loan term.
Let’s say you have 23 years left on a 30-year principal and interest loan of $300,000 at the standard variable rate of 5.9%. Your minimum monthly repayment will be $1,989. By extending your loan term back to 30 years, the amount would drop to $1,779.
Change from principal and interest to interest only.
Loans for owner occupiers are usually structured so that you pay off a small amount of principal alongside the interest. This helps reduce your loan balance faster than if paying interest alone. However, when your income drops after having a child, changing to interest only can ease the squeeze. Using the example above, the borrower’s new repayment would be $1,475 — a saving of a further $304 per month.
Renegotiate your interest rate.
The home loan market is constantly changing so if you’ve had your loan for more than two years, there may be a better option out there. For example, many lenders will offer a discount of 0.7% or more off the standard variable rate.
By extending their loan term, changing to to interest only and negotiating a discounted rate, our $300,000 borrower will pay $1,300 per month — freeing up a massive $689 to help meet expenses while their income is reduced.
Find your safety net.
Make sure your loan includes a redraw facility. If your property has increased substantially in value since you bought it and/or you’ve made extra repayments, a redraw facility can help you access these funds. Alternatively, you may be able to establish a line of credit, enabling you to draw on some of your equity to fund living expenses if required.
By planning your property and loan commitments well ahead of time, you can stop worrying about your finances and concentrate on something far more important — your new son or daughter.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
This article was first published on Property Observer in November 2013. 
</body></html>

How to stop your bundle of joy burning a hole in your pocket

<html><body>
We live in a crazy world where we are encouraged to invest and fund our own retirement but are not provided with adequate information or legislative protection to assist us to do so.
People who are looking to enter the property market are forced to rely on patchy information, as disclosure of sale results is not mandatory and access to past sales is hidden from view. In addition consumer protection laws for property investors are almost non-existent. As the wheels of the property market begin to turn this is the reality property investors face.
Currently there is no obligation for real estate agents or vendors to disclose sale results to the public. For years the industry has hidden behind privacy concerns but consider this, even a property sold via a public auction can be undisclosed. If you are watching the auction you would know the result but because of privacy concerns the vendor can elect to hide the result. Have you ever heard of anything so ludicrous!  
<blockquote>
Lack of regulation enables practitioners to sell investors a product or concept, under the guise of providing advice without taking into account an individual’s personal or financial circumstances.
</blockquote>
On any weekend as many as 10% - 20% of all auction results are not disclosed. Imagine if the board of BHP was to keep that much information hidden from the market place. There would be up roar and rightly so!
Further the historical growth of an individual asset is a key piece of information anyone buying property needs to know to make an informed decision. However what the property last sold for is usually very hard for the average punter to find. Again imagine if you were looking to purchase some BHP shares but had no access to historical values. It would be very difficult to work out fair market value.
But it gets worse for property investors. Legislation administered by the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) provides protection for investors in shares, managed funds and super. Financial planners are required to consider each client’s personal and financial situation, investment knowledge and risk tolerance before giving recommendations on strategies or products. They must also provide a rationale for the recommendations, and disclose fees and commissions they will receive if the client acts on their advice.
Investors in direct property, however, receive no such protection from the nation’s investment watchdog. This is a glaring anomaly given that, according to the Tax Office, around 1.5 million Australians declare rental income for investment properties.
The ASIC Act’s rationale for excluding direct property from the definition of what constitutes a ‘financial product’ is that — unlike shares, super and managed funds, where investors entrust day-to-day control to a third party to generate a return — direct property investors retain direct control of decisions and returns.
The fact that direct property investors retain control of their assets doesn’t mean they are any more likely to make sound investment decisions. On the contrary, the absence of a third party increases the need for inclusion in ASIC’s safety net.
Lack of regulation enables practitioners to sell investors a product or concept, under the guise of providing advice without taking into account an individual’s personal or financial circumstances.
The regulator’s attitude to direct property as an asset class is clearly out of step with the way it’s being utilised as an investment in the wider community. It’s time the legislation was amended to recognise direct property as a financial product and give property investors the same level of protection and access to information as those holding other asset classes.
The time is ripe for the nation’s corporate watchdog to step up to the plate. When investors turn their attention to property, they’ll be in a better position to make informed investment choices and less prone to the fallout from lousy investment advice.
</body></html>

Full disclosure and property investor protection

<html><body>
The RBA’s decision to leave interest rates on hold earlier this month is unlikely to have any negative effect on the property market. Interest rates have already fallen to a point where investors are being enticed to act and when investors come out so do the property marketers ready to sell.
But when you’re leafing through the glossy brochures and touring the display suites, remember that today’s financial benefits could be tomorrow’s financial headaches. These benefits are nothing new to the market as they are rolled out each time investors get active. Here are the most common ones to look out for:
Depreciation benefits
Buildings and their contents depreciate (decrease) in value, whilst land appreciates (increases). When you buy a new property, the tax office will enable you to defray part of the purchase price by allowing you to claim depreciation on certain items. This can be helpful in increasing your cash flow, particularly during the early years when the property is likely to be negatively geared.
However, the downside is that most of the depreciation you can claim comes from fittings and fixtures like the oven, air conditioner, blinds and carpets, which fully depreciate in five to 10 years. Furthermore, depending on the way you calculate your depreciation allowance, the amount you can claim may decrease each year. This means it will cost you more to hold the property as each year goes by.
Claiming depreciation can also have a hidden tax consequence because it will also increase the amount of capital gains tax you pay when you sell. I’m not saying you shouldn’t claim depreciation – but you should be aware that it may have financial consequences later down the track.
Stamp duty savings 
When you buy property off the plan in Victoria, you will only be liable to pay stamp duty on the property’s value on the date of purchase. If construction is partially completed, you’ll only pay stamp duty on that portion of the building, plus the land value. If construction hasn’t begun, you’ll only pay stamp duty on the land value.
<blockquote>
Don’t let short-term benefits hold too much sway when you’re choosing an investment property.
</blockquote>
Whilst this can help considerably when you first buy a property, it’s only a one-off saving that won’t help you after the loan has settled and you have to make repayments. What’s more, when you come to sell the property, potential buyers won’t have the same benefit of a stamp duty reduction, so there’s less incentive for them to buy it.
Rental guarantees 
When you buy a property brand new or off the plan, the developer will often undertake to provide a guaranteed level of rent each week for the first year or two that you hold the property. This kind of guarantee generally applies even when the property isn’t tenanted, because the developer picks up the tab.
Although it is reassuring to have certainty of rental income during the early stages of holding an investment property, there are two significant downsides. First, you’ll pay a premium to secure the rental guarantee; the developer will build it in to the sale price. Second, in accepting a guaranteed rent level, you’re insulated from market forces. Once the guarantee expires, the amount of rent your property can command will depend on a range of factors including supply and demand.
As newer properties come on to the market and tenants have a wider choice of places to live, the market rent for your property could fall. This is a particular risk in areas like the CBD and Docklands where there’s likely to be a substantial amount of new construction during 2009 and 2010 as developers scramble to keep up with demand from investors returning to the market.
Remember also that when you’re no longer protected by the rental guarantee, you’ll have to have sufficient cash flow to hold the property during periods when your property is not tenanted.
In summary, don’t let short-term benefits hold too much sway when you’re choosing an investment property. Focus instead on the long-term factors that will influence capital growth and rental demand: land values, demographic trends and the balance of supply versus demand. If these factors don’t add up, move on to another property.
You can visit Mark's website <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>.
</body></html>

Buying an investment property? Be aware of short-lived benefits

<html><body>
Valuations are at the heart of property investment – particularly when it comes to getting finance, or being refinanced, with a lender.
You might also just be asking ‘<a href="/news/27120-how-much-is-my-home-worth-judging-a-propertys-value" target="_blank">What is my home worth?</a>’ and a valuation may appear to be the natural way to answer this question.
<blockquote>
MUST KNOW ELEMENTS:
IT'S NOT AN APPRAISAL
THEY'RE NOT AN EXACT SCIENCE
THERE ARE MULTIPLE TYPES OF VALUATION
COMPARABLES ARE HEAVILY RELIED UPON
YOU CAN ASSIST THE VALUER 
</blockquote>
There are also many reasons why you’d want to get an independent valuation – observer<a href="/expert-insights/investing/21919-five-great-reasons-to-get-an-independent-valuation-cameron-mcevoy" target="_blank"> Cameron McEvoy aptly describes five crucial reasons you’d consider this</a> - and so it pays to be aware of what is involved.
Here are five ‘must know’ elements of valuations:
1) It’s not an appraisal
You may have had an appraisal with a real estate agent, and now believe that your home can fetch in excess of $630,000 on the current market. This may be the case, however a real estate agent’s appraisal is not a valuation, and will not be accepted by the bank as such.
While most real estate agents act with professionalism, investors must be aware that it’s not unheard of for real estate agents to alter the appraisal they provide you to match your expectations, and to be fairly bullish with their appraisals to secure a listing.
A valuer, however, is immune to these pressures, tasked with one job and one job alone – valuing your home.
2) They’re not an exact science
It will be of no surprise to any savvy investor that figuring out the price of a property is never an exact science, even for those trained in the valuation field. Similarly, obtaining two different valuations also isn’t an unheard of occurrence, and is the reason many investors will head to a different bank to obtain financing, particularly after a renovation.
Observer <a href="/expert-insights/investing/24155-wednesday-july-3-upper-right-mark-armstrong" target="_blank">Mark Armstrong refers to bank valuations as being ‘murky waters’</a>. “Remember if a valuation comes in too high and the bank loses money on the loan then the valuer maybe legally liable,” he notes, which may suggest why there is also a general impression in real estate that valuers are conservative with their estimates.
Similarly, it has been pointed out time and time again, such as <a href="/expert-insights/investing/13600-home-valuations-can-be-subjective-" target="_blank">by Mal James in this article</a>, that valuers are subjective. This is because they are human beings, and they act with the information provided and their knowledge to come up with the best possible response.
3) There are multiple types of valuation
While we’re focusing on a fairly rigorous in-person valuation, there are a number of different types of valuations. From the DIY desktop valuation (which have <a href="/expert-insights/investing/16329-diy-website-property-valuations-mostly-askew" target="_blank">varying results of accuracy</a>), to the ‘kerbside’ drive by valuation, be aware that not all are created equal.
RP Data lists four different types of valuation that you'll want to understand:
<ol>
<li>Full valuation</li>
<li>Short form or pro forma valuation</li>
<li>Restricted valuation (to include “restricted assessment”, “kerbside” and “drive by” valuations)</li>
<li>Desktop (to include electronic valuer review - EVR)</li>
</ol>
4) Comparables are heavily relied upon
One of the major aspects that valuers look at to come up with a final figure is that of 'comparables'. That is, recent sales in your area that are close to your property in location and type. A valuer will be required to judge whether your property is superior or inferior to these sales, and so adjust their valuation accordingly. If you want to get an idea of how the valuation may stack up, it'd be worth finding out the latest sales that they will be looking at. This also means that for properties in remote areas, or unique style homes, it will be trickier for the valuer to come up with a figure and, therefore, more subjective and down to interpretation.
5) You can assist the valuer 
As with any property, present it with its best foot forward for the best change of securing a good valuation. While valuers do not want to be harassed, told how to do their jobs or provided information that could sway them against the numbers, you can be helpful and provide information about improvements undertaken since purchase.
Be on site, ready to ask and answer questions, and have all the information about your property on hand.
Despite the reasons to get a valuation, there’s always the other side of the argument. If you’re considering a valuation, you may also want to hear <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/expert-insights/investing/19324-tuesday-upper-right-terry-ryder" target="_blank">Terry Ryder’s thoughts on why valuations are a “waste of time and money”</a>. Late last year, Property Observer also covered a <a href="%20http:/www.propertyobserver.com.au/financing/26422-valuation-industry-needs-overhaul" target="_blank">heated debate that asked for an ‘overhaul’ of the valuations industry</a>.
Tips for those wanting to get the best from a valuer:
<ul>
<li>Provide them a list of comparable sales (potentially inside the same project, as well as some that are not). While not all valuers will use them, some will. 
</li>
<li>Apply for finance six months before completion, not six days and if you find the valuation comes in low it gives you time to get a third and a fourth. 
</li>
<li>Attain your own valuation, using a valuer that is on your bank's panel of valuers. 
</li>
<li>Ask to see a soft valuation so you can check the comparables used and the comments made. 
</li>
<li>Bear in mind that the valuer often has a different valuation for mortgage purposes as opposed to sale purposes. But mainly: 
</li>
<li>Do your research beforehand.  Go out and look at 100 or even 10 before you make a purchase decision. If you've done your research you should be confident it will value up.</li>
</ul>
Source: CPM Realty
FURTHER USEFUL READING 
<a href="/expert-insights/finance/15169-property-valuations-get-them-right" target="_blank">How to get property valuations right</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/investing/15397-property-valuation-101" target="_blank">Property valuation 101</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/26499-letters-to-the-editor-valuation-experiences" target="_blank">Letters to the editor: Valuation experiences</a>
</body></html>

Mark Armstrong

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Mark Armstrong

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News