Macro Economics

<html><body>
According to leading economists and market commentators, liquidity has started to tighten in Australian markets in direct response to regulatory changes implemented by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) across the banking sector forcing banks to hold more capital. 
In addition, global and macro-economic factors are adding to the squeeze on liquidity and the impacts on the domestic property sector are far-reaching.
The writing has been on the wall for some time. In mid-2015 we could see market conditions driven by APRA were leading banks to reducing their appetite for construction and development.
So far in 2016, credit for the property sector has tightened even further, particularly from the banking market. All major banks have reduced funding on a loan to valuation ratio basis and also by limiting exposure to developer and construction clients. Some banks now openly state they will not underwrite to new clients in this sector.
The credit pricing has bottomed out.
The increase of margins is partly a way for the banks to respond to return on equity dilution through the increased capital requirements by APRA and potentially alleviate margin squeeze due to liquidity pricing movements on their balance sheets.
Examining Credit Default Swaps (CDS) shows the major banks experienced a blow out at the beginning of 2016 to levels not seen since 2012. As an example, in January, 2016 the CDS price for NAB credit was below 80 basis points and has spiked at around 136 basis points with a current level of around 125 basis points.
This is the first time since the onset of the GFC where we have seen margin pricing increases in the banking market, on property investment loans as well as development and construction loans. Whilst CDS pricing has been at above these levels post GFC, the banks have not increased margins, but at that time they were not dealing with APRA requirements and pressures on profitability.
This trend is growing and market indicators all point toward further margin increases in the short term and securing finance in the next six to 12 months will be critical as setting finance now will lock in margins at historic lows and avoid any potential credit crunch issues.
 
Domenic Lo Surdo is executive director of Stamford Capital and can be contacted <a href="https://www.stamfordcapital.com.au/people" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Is Australia set for a credit crunch? Domenic Lo Surdo

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
What do a billionaire, a former vice president, and a US democratic socialist have to do with Australia’s nearly three-decade run of economic growth?
More than you might think.
The race for the Democratic Party’s 2020 Presidential nomination is far from over – in fact voting in the first state (Iowa) doesn’t even begin until January. But Senator Elizabeth Warren has become the front-runner in betting markets and national polls, pulling ahead of former vice president Joe Biden.
Warren is running on a “democratic socialist” platform of banning private health insurance, imposing a wealth tax and more rigorously examining proposed trade agreements. Biden is much more centrist – he was Barack Obama’s vice president after all – but he is struggling to maintain the lead he once held.
This has a number of people freaked out. Among them is former New York mayor (and former Republican) Mike Bloomberg, who has filed paperwork to get himself into the Democratic primary race.
Bloomberg is a pro-market, socially liberal, three-term mayor of New York. He amassed a US$50 billion fortune by creating the category-killing <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/company/stories/understanding-bloomberg-and-the-terminal/" target="_blank">Bloomberg terminal</a> for financial data and securities trading.
He has taken progressive stands on gun control, gay rights and women’s reproductive rights.
And on climate change he spent half a billion dollars on climate mitigation projects as well as campaigning with the environment group <a href="https://www.sierraclub.org/" target="_blank">Sierra Club</a> (successfully) for coal mines to be closed.
Bloomberg’s path to the Democratic nomination is far from assured, but in Australia someone like him would be in the mould of prime ministers past.
And that tells us something important about our internationally unusual long run of economic growth.
Straight down the middle
Since Bill Hayden became Labor (and opposition) leader in 1977 and put to rest the economic upheaval of the Whitlam era, Australia’s two major political parties have maintained, for the most part, staunchly centrist economic policies. They’ve combined the virtues of markets with a strong social safety set.
The <a href="https://theconversation.com/hawke-was-our-larrikin-but-also-our-reformer-117308" target="_blank">Hawke-Keating government famously opened up the Australian economy</a> to the world: floating the Australian dollar, deregulating the banking system, slashing tariffs, and privatising sleepy state-owned enterprises.
John Howard not only continued this legacy but introduced the Goods and Services Tax – a much more efficient form of taxation than had existed – and successfully negotiated the <a href="https://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/in-force/ausfta/Pages/australia-united-states-fta.aspx" target="_blank">Australia-US Free Trade Agreement</a>.
And though the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd government may have lacked stability, it did not lack major economic achievements.
Rudd and then Treasury boss Ken Henry <a href="http://research.economics.unsw.edu.au/richardholden/assets/did-labor-really-save-us-from-the-gfc-we-ask-an-expert.pdf" target="_blank">acted decisively with stimulus and bank guarantees</a> to avoid the economic disaster that hit most of the rest of the world.
<a href="https://images.theconversation.com/files/301692/original/file-20191114-77315-1hc4e9a.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip"><img src="https://images.theconversation.com/files/301692/original/file-20191114-77315-1hc4e9a.jpg?ixlib=rb-1.1.0&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=237&amp;fit=clip" alt=""></a>
Total annual greenhouse gas emissions excluding emissions from land use, land use change and forestry. <a class="source" href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2018/jan/09/australias-emissions-are-rising-its-time-for-this-government-to-quick-pretending" target="_blank">Greg Jericho, Guardian</a>
Gillard introduced a carbon tax that had an almost immediate effect in reducing Australia’s emissions.
While the Abbott-Turnbull-Morrison government’s stance on climate change has been rightly criticised (often by yours truly), it has continued to enact free trade agreements, the most recent of which, the <a href="https://dfat.gov.au/trade/agreements/negotiations/rcep/Pages/regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership.aspx" target="_blank">Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership</a>, might be <a href="https://theconversation.com/are-trumps-tariffs-legal-under-the-wto-it-seems-not-and-they-are-overturning-70-years-of-global-leadership-121425" target="_blank">truly transformational</a>.
Sometimes veering to the sides
Although that centrism has served Australia well socially and economically, there have been moments where policy looked like it would veer away from the centre.
Labor opposed the goods and services tax. The current government has flirted with government guarantees for new coal-fired power plants, which was a policy more in the spirit of Marx and Lenin than Howard and Costello.
Holding the centre
The current depressing state of the Australian economy (pun intended) might provide the biggest test yet to centrist economic policy.
Wage growth is sluggish (Wednesday’s figures showed annual growth slipping from a historically low <a href="https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/inextricably-linked-wage-growth-flatlines-as-report-shows-jobless-rate-hurting-economy-20191113-p53a94" target="_blank">2.3% to 2.2%</a>) and unemployment is climbing (Thursday’s figures showed the unemployment rate climbing from <a href="https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Latestproducts/6202.0Main%20Features1Oct%202019?opendocument&amp;tabname=Summary&amp;prodno=6202.0&amp;issue=Oct%202019&amp;num=&amp;view=" target="_blank">5.2% to 5.3%</a>).
There’s pressure from both the left and the right to “do something”.
Cutting immigration, moving away from free trade, propping up failing industries, or offering selective wage rises to particular sectors (such as childcare workers) are among the “somethings” that have been on the table or partially implemented.
The Hawke-Keating and Howard-Costello governments sustained centrist economic policy for more than two decades.
They did it not only through a series of sound policy choices, but also through a narrative about the virtues of markets coupled with a social safety net.
It’s a narrative under threat. In Australia it hasn’t been drowned out yet.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/126918/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;">
Richard Holden, Professor of Economics, UNSW.
This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/vital-signs-might-straight-down-the-middle-be-the-source-of-our-economic-success-126918" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

Macro Economics

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Macro Economics

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News