<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
For prospective buyers of property many understand that they require at least a 5 to 10 percent deposit to purchase a property.
However, what I generally find upon sitting down with a new client is that most aren’t aware that ALL lenders look at the various types of property (also referred to as ‘security’) and rate them with different LVRs. Now what exactly is an LVR? It stands for ‘Loan to Value Ratio’. In a nutshell the way you get a LVR rating is to divide the loan amount by the property’s value. So for example if you have a loan for $800,000 secured by a property worth $1,000,000, then the LVR is 80 percent.
For most standard residential suburban homes/ apartments, banks will generally lend on LVRs anywhere from 90 to 97 percent (inclusive of any Lenders Mortgage insurance). However, there are many properties that are regarded as being of more risk to the bank and are referred to as non-standard securities. Consequently, the maximum LVR the bank wants to be exposed to is less. Below is an example of just some of the restrictions on LVRs for different property types:
Small Apartments/ Bedsit/ Studio
An apartment greater than 40 sqm but less than 50sqm of internal space (and this excludes the balcony and car spot), will see many lenders refuse to lend on these properties altogether. However, those that do, range diversely in the maximum LVR they’ll go to.
Some will go to a maximum of 60 percent whereas there are few that will go up to 95 percent. If you do find a property that has less than 40 sqm, there are only a handful that will consider the deal and often it is assessed on a ‘case by case’ basis with a low LVR applied.
Serviced Apartments/ Student Accommodation
Of the lenders that will consider these securities, the maximum is normally around an LVR of 60 percent to 70 percent regardless of the size of the property.
Over-55 Complexes
At the moment, it’s hard to find lenders out there that will consider these properties due to the fact that if the bank had to sell the property because of a borrower’s default on repayments, then the bank is heavily restricted in who they can sell it to recoup their money. Areas such as the Northern Beaches of Sydney are getting more and more of these complexes so it will be interesting to see if banks change their thinking on this form of security as the Australian populace ages.
Rural Properties
Lenders have varying LVRs when it comes to the assortment of property types available in rural/regional areas. For example if the residential property is 10 hectares or less, is located in a serviced rural/ country town, is connected to power, a landline, sewage, and road access then you can possibly go up to an LVR of 95 percent.
If you are looking at a hobby farm that is between 10 to 50 hectares then some lenders will go to LVRs between 60 to 90 percent. Over 50 hectares and less than 200 hectares is limited to only a few lenders who may go as low as 50 percent on the LVR. In most, if not all cases, the rural property cannot be used for commercial income purposes other than renting out the residence to a tenant.
Company Title
These forms of title are generally restricted to older styled apartments which predate 1961 when strata title was introduced. Since 1961 most apartments have been registered as strata title. It’s in Sydney’s eastern suburbs where the majority of company titled properties are located in NSW. Whilst many lenders won’t lend to these sorts of properties, those that normally do, lend to a maximum LVR between 70 and 85 percent.
In Conclusion
When it comes to financing a property purchase it is always best to engage the services of a qualified mortgage broker who is able to help advise you on what you need to know when it comes to selecting a non-standard security.
Reuben Brown is lending manager of Horizon Mortgages and can be contacted <a href="https://www.horizonmortgages.com.au" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Property 101: What is an LVR Loan to Value Ratio?

<html><body>
Data released by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) earlier this week has shown that high loan to value ratio (LVR) lending continues to fall indicating new buyers are in many instances using larger deposits. 
The latest authorised deposit-taking institution (ADI) property exposures data for the March 2017 quarter revealed the ongoing trend as a moderate pull-back in the share of new interest-only mortgage lending however, there will be a lot more work to do for lenders in this space.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/31/Chart-1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/31/Chart-1.jpg" alt="">
The data showed that over the March 2017 quarter there was $89.257 billion in mortgage lending from the ADIs which was the lowest quarterly value of lending since the same quarter last year. 
Of course, part of this is seasonal due to the Christmas / New Year slowdown and lending over the quarter was 9.5 percent higher than the corresponding quarter last year. 
Over the quarter 65 percent of lending was to owner occupiers ($58.009 billion) with the remaining 35 percent ($31.248 billion) to investors. 
The value of lending to owner occupiers was 3.9 percent higher year-on-year while investor lending was 21.7 percent higher.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/31/Chart-2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/31/Chart-2.jpg" alt="">
There is currently a big focus on interest-only lending with APRA recently announcing policy changes which limit the value of new interest-only lending to less than 30 percent of the flow of total new mortgage lending.
Over the latest quarter, 36.2 percent of the value of total mortgage lending was for interest-only purposes signifying that further rationing of this type of lending is required. 
Although as a proportion of total lending interest-only lending has slowed, the value of this type of lending has increased by 13.8 percent from the same quarter last year. 
Importantly, interest-only lending peaked at 45.6 percent of the value of total new lending over the June 2015 quarter, so as a proportion of total lending it has already fallen substantially but has quite a way further to slow over the coming quarters as lenders work to meet the new 30 percent APRA benchmark by rationing the availability of this type of mortgage.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/31/Chart-3.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/31/Chart-3.jpg" alt="">
Low documentation ($377 million), non-standard ($142 million) and outside of serviceability loans ($1.461 billion) accounted for a cumulative 2.2 percent of new lending over the quarter. 
Although this was an historic low proportion, it should be noted that in value terms, low documentation (+42.5 percent) and non-standard (+21.6 percent) loans have increased over the year while outside of serviceability mortgages are -59.4 percent lower.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/31/Chart-4.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/31/Chart-4.jpg" alt="">
Over the quarter, $6.896 billion in new mortgages written had an LVR of greater than 90 percent. 
This represents the lowest value of new mortgage lending for LVRs above 90 percent since March 2011. 
It also indicates that 90 percent + LVR mortgages accounted for just 7.7 percent of all new mortgages over the quarter which was an historic low proportion. 
If you look at new mortgages with an LVR greater than 80 percent, they accounted for 22.0 percent of lending which is also an historic low. 
This indicates that borrowers are using either larger deposits upon entry to the market or using greater equity in their existing properties.
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/05/31/Chart-5.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/05/31/Chart-5.jpg" alt="">
According to the data, the average outstanding mortgage balance was recorded at $259,400 at the end of March 2017 which was 0.8 percent higher over the quarter and 3.9 percent higher over the year. 
By loan type, the average outstanding balances were recorded at: $314,100 for loans with an offset facility, $346,100 for interest-only mortgages, $100,100 for reverse mortgages, $193,100 for low-documentation loans and $185,600 for other non-standard loans. 
Other non-standard loans were the only mortgage type to see a fall in outstanding balance over the year, -4.0 percent lower while the average outstanding balance for interest-only mortgages recorded the greatest rise, 4.2% higher.
The reduction in new lending to higher LVR borrowers is encouraging from a risk perspective with borrowers typically utilising larger deposits. 
While the proportion of lending for interest-only purposes has slowed, it has much further to fall over the coming quarters as lenders seek to reign interest-only lending in to less than 30% of the new flow of lending. 
With interest-only lending favoured by investors it may lead to a slowing in demand from this segment. 
Keep in mind that borrowers utilising interest-only mortgages are assessed on their ability to repay a principal and interest loan. 
Given this there is the possibility that the impact on investor demand may be minimal as they choose to just use a principal and interest loan rather than interest-only.
Investors face a broadening range of disincentives in the market, with mortgage rates for investment purposes up more than 25 basis points compared with their low point last year, record low rental yields and overall tighter credit policies from lenders. 
Additionally, there seems to be growing acceptance that the housing market is losing some momentum which is likely to further weigh on investor purchase decisions.
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/about/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

ckusher-ujnxiKuFQs

High LVR lending is easing up with a further slowdown expected: Cameron Kusher

<html><body>
Hi Margaret,
With banks now restricted to only 80% LVR do you think this will significantly affect prices? I have two properties in Sydney. Both are renting for $450 per week
Before this announcement one was probably worth at least 800K (house on land 873sqm) and the other at least $500,000.
Do you think it's worthwhile seeing the yield is so low for my Canley vale property to sell it and buy 2 properties in Brisbane where the yield could be higher and I'll have two more properties despite losing 1?
Would this be still worthwhile seeing I have to pay capital gains tax (purchased 7 years ago for 446K) and taking into account all buying and selling fees.
I have considered more on using buyers agents as maybe they are not all spruikers.
Regards,
Allen
 
Hi Allen, 
Firstly we must make clear that the banks are not technically restricted to only lending 80% (it's not law), and the new, tougher criteria being set by some banks is only targeting investors, with owner occupiers mostly not affected. In response to The Australia Prudential Regulatory Authority's (APRA) calls for stricter controls around investment lending, banks like NAB and CBA have announced an end to pricing discounts for investors. ANZ have done the same, unless you have a PPR mortgage with them as well. Many lenders are also changing the maximum Loan to Valuation ratios (LVR) that they will allow for investors. As an example, BankWest will now apply a maximum LVR of 80% for all investment purposes (property and shares). This means that you will still be able to access funding at higher LVRs if you're an investor, you'll just have to pay for it with an increased interest rate, or, more to the point, no access to the discounts which can usually be obtained if you negotiate well enough. It's my opinion that this won't have a big impact on property prices, instead landlords will simply raise their rents to make up for the difference in their cash flows which the loss of these discounts will cause. We have to remember also that it's simply not suitable to say we are in a boom in the property market - I am sure the people of Adelaide and Perth would be quite surprised to hear they are in a boom, which making such sweeping claims infers.  We should hope that this inappropriate move by lenders doesn't impact the property market, as many areas can ill afford anything else to stunt growth. In terms of your property, I believe that, with or without these moves, people holding Sydney property may well find that the values stall a little in the coming 18 months anyway.  The market has overshot the mark, with frenzied buying pushing prices up well over the intrinsic value of properties in many areas. When that happens and the market cools, as it always does, the values seen in the last phase of that boom often suffer and fall back a little.  In your case you'll still be fine, as even with an adjustment in values, you've still made a really good gain. While I believe that the Brisbane market is likely to run soon, that's not advice to sell what you have in Sydney.  You could be up for a hefty capital gains tax bill which will eat into the returns.  It can be better to instead leverage against the equity and hang on to property you already have, choosing to sell it at times when you know you will be in a lower tax bracket, such as when you have left the paid workforce. 
As you have bought in to these areas while prices were a lot lower, I'm sure that your yields are pretty good, for you.  Yield relates to what you paid for the property, not what it is worth, and as the property has gained so much value, you should be seeing a pretty good return on that initial investment. In terms of a buyer's agent, just make sure that, if you choose to use one, they are a Qualified Property Investment Adviser (with the Property Investment Professionals of Australia) and that they have a broad based knowledge of all markets in Australia. 
You want your adviser to be helping you to buy property in the best area at that moment in time, not just in the area where they personally happen to be active. You should also become as educated as you can about everything to do with investing (not just where to buy) before going any further. In my experience, those who take the time to become suitably educated first usually make better and more lasting choices and build stronger, better performing portfolios.
Have a property question?   <a href="mailto:askmargaret@propertyobserver.com.au" target="_blank">Ask Margaret!</a>
</body></html>

mlomas-KC9MUPZ6Ca

Ask Margaret: Will bank LVR restrictions affect prices?

<html><body>
First application Loan-to-Valuation Ratio (LVR) Index from Veda and CoreLogic reveals improved financial security for Australian lenders.
<div>
The national average of application loan-to-valuation ratio (LVR) across Australia is currently tracking at 74.3%, according to the new Index from property data and analytics experts CoreLogic, and Veda, Australia and New Zealand’s leading provider of consumer and commercial data and insights and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Equifax. 
<h3>Application Loan-to-Valuation Ratio National</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image2.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image2.jpg" alt="">
Released tomorrow for the first time, the Index draws on the CoreLogic median dwelling values compared against the median residential loan application amount from Veda.  The result is a timely indicator of application loan-to-valuation ratios across Australia over time. 
The CoreLogic and Veda measure of application LVRs provides a geographically specific indication on mortgage leverage at a granular level at the time of application. 
While the current application LVR is 1.7 percentage points higher than in 2011 (72.6 percent), it is significantly lower than when it peaked in 2013, when the average application LVR was measured at 78.9 percent.
Moses Samaha, Veda’s General Manager of Commercial and Property Solutions, said the new Index would leverage Veda and CoreLogic’s data and insights to provide more detailed analysis of market conditions. 
“We are excited to be partnering with CoreLogic to offer more detailed insight into the housing market and level of leverage households are typically committing to,” Mr Samaha said. 
“In the past 12 months to September, we have seen the national median dwelling valuation rise 5.5% and the median residential loan enquiry amount rise 3.4%,” Mr Samaha added. 
Geographically, the application LVR trend is being driven downwards by higher equity levels and substantial household wealth across the premium housing markets of Australia, particularly in Melbourne and Sydney. However, Sydney has recently experienced an upswing in average application LVRs. 
<h3>Application Loan-to-Valuation Ratio Sydney Median</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image1.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image1.jpg" alt="">
“It’s common for capital cities with weaker housing market conditions to experience an increase in average application LVR. For example, Perth’s application LVR has jumped from 72.8 prcent to 77.1 percent in the past five years, sitting 2.8 percentage points above the national average,” Mr Samaha said.
<h3>Application Loan-to-Valuation Ratio Sept 2011 v Sept 2016</h3>
<a href="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image4.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/11/30/2016-11-04--loanvaluation--image4.jpg" alt="">
“Sydney dwelling values have increased by almost 95% since the beginning of 2009 which has created a large amount of equity for those who have owned a dwelling during this time.  High equity is likely one of the key factors that has pushed application LVRs lower in Sydney and to a lesser extent, Melbourne,” Mr Samaha added. 
Average application LVRs in the other capital cities show mixed results. Application LVRs in Canberra and Hobart have leveled off recently on the back of improving housing market conditions. Brisbane has also seen the application LVR trend lower, reducing from a peak of 80.5% in October 2013 to the current reading of 77.7 percent. 
According to the Veda and CoreLogic findings, the trend towards lower application LVR estimates since 2013 can be attributed to a number of factors.  
The increasing volume of refinancing and mortgage top-ups for renovations or home extensions is likely to be a key factor driving application LVR measurements lower.  
First home buyers are also likely to be impacting the data. According to Australian Bureau of Statistics housing finance data, the number of first home buyers as a proportion of all owner-occupier housing finance commitments has declined from approximately 17 percent in early 2013 to a recent low of 12.9% in March 2016. First home buyers generally have smaller deposits and their lack of activity in the market may be pushing overall application LVR’s lower. 
Tim Lawless, Head of Research at CoreLogic Asia Pacific, said the level of application LVR is an indicator of prudent lending standards and financial stability. 
“Regulators and policy makers are likely to see the lower application LVR as a positive outcome, which is reflective of a more considered and prudent lending regime,” Mr Lawless said. 
“One of the factors contributing to lower application LVRs is the heightened risk assessment many lenders are applying to select housing markets, whereby larger deposits are required to offset higher lending risk.  
“Markets where dwelling values have shown substantial and rapid growth, where supply levels are high, or markets with disproportionate exposure to singular industries, such as mining towns, are typically being assessed by lenders as higher risk. Lenders in these markets are demanding lower LVRs to help minimise their own risk,” Mr Lawless added. 
The data from CoreLogic and Veda supports a similar trend in LVR reported by Australian Prudential Regulation Authority, which shows LVRs originating between 60 and 80 percent have comprised a larger proportion of lending.
Tim Lawless is head of the CoreLogic research and analytics team and can be contacted <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/author/timlawless/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</body></html>

tlawless-5VLUrbAk9s

Loan-to-Valuation Ratios level out after trending lower since 2013: Tim Lawless

<html><body>
ING Direct's maximum LVR (including LMI premium) for investment loan applications in New South Wales has been reduced to 80%, the latest lender to announce changes in the wake of APRA’s crackdown on investor lending.
Australian Broker reports that outside of NSW the maximum LVR for investor loans will be 90%. 
For owner occupier loans nationally, the maximum LVR has been re-set to 95%. All changes to maximum LVRs will be effective for loan applications received from Wednesday 10 June 2015.
</body></html>

ING moves to 80% maximum NSW LVR amid APRA crackdown

<html><body>
Kirsty Lamont from <a href="https://mozo.com.au/home-loans" target="_blank">Mozo.com.au</a> tells us the five numbers that you need to know following Tuesday’s record low rate cut.
3.98%
This is now the lowest variable home loan rate on the market from Loans.com.au. If this is a lot lower than your current rate it might be time to consider refinancing.
3
Three year fixed rates is where we are seeing home loan rates lower than the best variable. The popular 3 year category is being led by HSBC, offering a 3.95% rate.
$11,160
This is how much interest you could save by keeping your repayments the same and not reducing your repayments in line with a 0.25% discount passed on by your lender – if they’ve passed it on of course! (Based on a $300,000, 80% LVR loan over 25 years)
9
So far, only this many lenders have passed on Tuesday’s full 0.25% rate cut. This means seven have passed on part of the cut and a further 63 have yet to make a decision on whether to pass on a discount. 
$7.8 million
This is how much lenders profit with each day that a potential 0.25% rate cut is not delivered to customers. 
Source <a href="https://mozo.com.au/home-loans" target="_blank">Mozo.com.au</a>
</body></html>

mick.cee-iDmgDDAmu8

The five need-to-know numbers of the week: Mozo's interest rate watch

<html><body><div data-position="parent-floating">
<div data-module="redesign/ninemsn/portal/news/decorators/scrolleyDecorator" data-tablet-offset="50" data-desktop-offset="35" data-position="floating">
<div data-module="redesign/ninemsn/portal/news/decorators/shareDecorator">
Further changes to banks' capital requirements could increase the cost for first time buyer customers.
ANZ deputy chief executive Graham Hodges says further changes could be required after a review by the international Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
"Proposals currently under consideration by the international Basel committee could lead to further significant changes to bank capital requirements applying to housing," Mr Hodges told a federal parliamentary inquiry into home ownership last week.
"This could have the effect of increasing the cost of finance particularly for those customers borrowing at a higher loan-to-value ratios," Fairfax Media reported.
"Over time this will likely disadvantage those buyers namely some first home buyers with smaller housing deposits."
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority's new capital requirements for the big four banks and also Macquarie Group will require them to hold billions of dollars in extra capital against their mortgage books from July 1 next year.
Last week's comments are the first made by the bank on the matter.
“The potential consequences of the Basel IV proposals need to be carefully considered,” ANZ advised in its submission to the Murray inquiry report, which recommended regulators increase capital requirements for the banks so they are unquestionably strong globally.   “In the residential mortgage market, for example, the proposals may encourage authorised deposit-taking institutions to implement much greater differential pricing between customer groups than currently occurs in the Australian market, to reflect the wider spectrum of capital requirements.   “This may include higher pricing to customers with higher loan to value ratios.”
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Lvr

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Lvr