Landmarks

<html><body>
The NSW Government has called for expressions of interest to purchase the Sirius building in The Rocks, with a reported $120 million price tag.
Brett Newman, CEO of Property NSW, said the sale process for the property, located at <a href="https://maps.google.com/?q=2-60+Cumberland+Street&amp;entry=gmail&amp;source=g">2-60 Cumberland Street</a>, would be undertaken by way of a two-stage competitive tender process, the first phase an expression of interest and the second a Request for Tender.
“The Government is confident the draft site-specific State Significant Precinct State Environmental Planning Policy, in development by the Department of Planning and Environment, will ensure any future development on the site will consider the significant heritage of The Rocks precinct, including its design, balancing the best outcome for local residents and the wider community,” Newman said.
“The new planning controls, which include the requirement of quality design outcomes, will materially enhance amenity in the area, and will ensure the maximum height of any building would be restricted to the height of the Sydney Harbour Bridge deck.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/5/25/sirius2.jpg" alt="">
“We want to ensure the best value for the State is achieved for the asset while preserving the character of the area.
“Importantly, funds realised through the sale of the site will be reinvested by the Government in new social housing across the State.”
Savills Australia is conducting an international sales campaign to highlight the <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/news/79017-sydney-s-iconic-sirius-building-for-sale" target="_blank">future potential of the landmark site.</a>
The EOI will run from May 25 for five weeks. 
The sales process is expected to be finalised by the end of 2018.
There is a proposed maximum GFA of 8,420sqm* and flexible B4 Mixed Use proposed land zoning incorporated within the SEPP.
According to Simon Fenn, Managing Director of Savills NSW, Sirius represents a unique opportunity to acquire a rare, freehold land parcel in arguably Sydney’s tightest held precinct. 
“The site provides exceptional Sydney Harbour views to the north and the east, spanning the Bridge and Opera House, which must be seen to be believed,” he continued.
Stuart Cox, Director of Residential Site Sales at Savills Australia, expects high buyer interest.
Mr Cox believes Sirius may be the last freehold development opportunity in the harbour-side precinct of The Rocks.
 
 
</body></html>

jrobinson-rf4aSBido9

Next phase of Sirius sale process underway through Savills Australia

<html><body>
The landmark Sirius apartment complex in Sydney's Millers Point has been listed for sale on behalf of the NSW Government.
They have enlisted Savills to market the 11 storey building, built in the late 1970s by architect Tao Gofers.
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
<div>
A registration of interest process is now open, to be followed by a formal expression of interest stage leading to an invitation to tender for selected applicants. The sale is expected to be finalised in the second half of 2018. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Sirius was built to rehouse public tenants who had been displaced after a controversial redevelopment of the historic Rocks suburb during the 1960s and 70s.
A prominent examaple of Brutalist architecture in Australia, Sirius houses 79 one, two, three and four bedroom apartments. Most apartments have harbour and city views, with the rooftop a 360 degree view across both.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/12/8/sirius2.jpg" alt="">
Savills agents Simon Fenn, Stuart Cox, Neil Cooke and Michael Simpson are marketing the property through an international sales campaign with the opportunity for a variety of uses through the flexible zoning application to the 3,650 sqm site.
Savills NSW managing director Simon Fenn said this was a once in a lifetime opportunity.
“Sirius is positioned on some of the most valuable land in Australia and will certainly attract interest from around the globe, with a once in a lifetime opportunity to revitalise this prime site with a range of potential future scenarios including residential, commercial, hotel and retail or a mix of these.”
“Never before has a building with such unobstructed and striking harbour views within the heart of Sydney been offered to the market. A proposal like this is certainly one in a million,” he continued.
Sydney has already seen a major renaissance for the CBD core with approximately $7.9 billion worth of new construction and infrastructure earmarked for the Circular Quay precinct.
Redevelopment at the 3650 sqm site at 2 to 60 Cumberland Street will be limited by a set of rules, the State Significant Precinct State Environmental Planning Policy, which is now on exhibition.
<div>
The new owner is entitled to demolish or adapting the building in its current state for residential, commercial and retail use up to 8420 sqm of gross floor space and across two to four storeys. The height of the building must not exceed the height of the Sydney Harbour Bridge deck.
</div>
<div>
It also has to meet design excellence.
Proceeds of the sale of the building will go towards new social housing across the state. More than 700 purpose-built dwellings have been built and there are 372 properties under construction.
</div>
 
 
 
 
</body></html>

Sydney's iconic Sirius building for sale through Savills

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/83424/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-advanced" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Australians have been fascinated by “Big Things” since the 1960s, when statues such as Adelaide’s Big Scotsman and the Big Banana in Coffs Harbour were opened to great fanfare.
These super-sized structures can be found in other countries, too. The United States is known for its Big Donut, Canada has the world’s largest fiddle, but the attachment to Big Things here has an almost patriotic quality.
Many will recall childhood road trips punctuated by such highlights as a giant Merino sheep or a towering rocking horse, or an assortment of fruits – the Big Avocado, the Big Orange and the Big Mango. When the latter was reported “missing” in 2014, the news made national headlines, only to be later revealed as a publicity stunt.
But in a nation now littered with at least 200 Big Things, there is a sizeable problem. What to do with them as they age and wear out? Many Big Things were built cheaply from concrete and fibreglass – materials that inevitably fade and decay. 
Some structures — such as the Big Pineapple, the Big Macadamia Nut, the Big Orange and the Big Prawn — have, in recent times, either fallen into disrepair or struggled to bring in much income. Then there are others, such as Cairns’s Big Captain Cook, which invite controversy.
The Big Captain Cook stands in a vacant lot on the side of the Cook Highway; its legs show signs of concrete cancer and its paint job is flaky. The hotel that once accompanied Cook is long demolished, and the local community is divided over the appropriate fate of its landmark. 
Should he be repainted, or dismantled, or relocated to a place such as James Cook University where, in 2006, students petitioned for his adoption? (Since the university is named after Cook, they thought it would be a good match.) Earlier this year, he was draped with a large Sorry sign to coincide with Australia Day. Indigenous artist Munganbana Norman Miller has proposed the Cook statue be given a Big Boomerang to hold.
Then there is South Australia’s “Larry” the Lobster. Created in 1979, the 17-metre fibreglass crustacean has been on the market intermittently since the late 1980s and reportedly needed repairs. The state government offered A$10,000 to help in late 2015. 
The Lobster was recently the subject of a nationwide fundraising campaign #PinchAMate led by radio hosts Hamish and Andy. Earlier this month, Larry, who comes with a restaurant attached, failed to draw a bid at auction. But its owners said they were still hopeful of selling Larry, which recently had a A$50,000-plus makeover.
Yet while some Big Things, such as the Big Orange (Berri, South Australia) and the Big Macadamia Nut (Nambour, Queensland), sit abandoned, communities continue to build new monuments to attract tourists to remote corners of Australia. The Big Golden Gumboot in Tully, the Big Bogan in Nyngan and the Big Meat Ant in Augathella are examples of the new generation of local symbols. 
On the one hand, we can hardly begrudge a community that wishes to unite around a wonderfully kitschy piece of public art. On the other, we have to question why local authorities allow new structures to go ahead when these same local authorities may be asked to take on their upkeep in 30 years’ time.
One of Australia’s most beloved Big Things, the Big Pineapple in Nambour, was built in 1971. It was once a necessary pit-stop on the Queensland coastal tourist trail. In 1983, even Prince Charles and Princess Diana visited it. But in recent years the number of visitors to the Big Pineapple has fallen dramatically. It has been for sale several times since 1996, and even closed for a period during 2010-2011. 
In 2009, the Big Pineapple was added to the Queensland State Heritage Register, giving it some legal protection. This move also imposed an expectation that the owners would maintain the structure for future generations. Some saw this as a victory, but for others — including the owners at the time — the listing was a burden that limited opportunities for commercial success. 
In 2017, the Big Pineapple is in the news again. A proposal for a multi-million-dollar overhaul is before the local council, with the aim of converting it into an “extreme tourism” attraction with adventure tourism, music, a water park, camping, a brewery and winery. This is clearly another attempt to bring life (and income) back to the ageing icon.
The sheer volume of Australia’s Big Things makes it impossible to guarantee that all will survive. More local authorities will inevitably face emotive public debates, akin to the furore over the Ballina council’s threatened demolition of the Big Prawn in 2009. (In that instance, the crustacean was bought by Bunnings, which kept it as part of a redevelopment of the property it was attached to.) 
One man’s trash is another man’s Big Pineapple. These are undeniably public landmarks of socio-cultural significance, and some — like the Pineapple — warrant preservation. 
Still, heritage bodies and governments will need to make difficult, and probably unpopular, decisions that may likely send some of our Big Things to the scrap heap. At the time they were built, it was already clear that Big Things typically have an expiration date.
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/amy-clarke-248726" target="_blank">Amy Clarke</a> is lecturer in History specialising in built heritage and cultural/identity politics, University of the Sunshine Coast and author for <a href="https://theconversation.com/au" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>.
</body></html>

Landmarks

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Landmarks

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News