First Home Owner Grant

<html><body>
A one-off $7,000 payment to those relocating to a regional area finishes today in New South Wales. The Regional Relocation Home Buyers Grant is a payment provided to those relocating from a metropolitan to a regional area, and is noted as not meeting the Government's objectives.
Available to Australian citizens and permanent residents, to receive the grant the applicant must have purchased a regional property on or after 1 July 2011, and on or prior to 30 September 2014.
The regional home must not exceed $600,000, or $450,000 for vacant land.
The applicant must begin living in the regional property within 12 months of purchase, and reside in the property for 12 continuous months. For those purchasing vacant land, they must commence construction within six months and reside in the home within 12 months of purchase date.
You must also have owned and occupied a metropolitan home as a principal place of residence in the 12 months prior to commencing the purchase, and it must be sold in the 12 months prior or after purchase.
Alternatively, those renting homes in a metropolitan area for 12 months prior to purchase, and who can establish a two-year continuous rental history in metropolitan areas, can apply. This was only valid from 1 January 2014.
Applications submitted from 1 January also required the purchased regional property to be further than a 100 kilometre radius from the metropolitan home.
Prior to 2014, only one grant was available per household, even if two regional properties were purchased. However, since 1 January, if two regional properties are purchased and both applications qualify then two grants may be achievable. No value limit is placed on the sale achieved on the metropolitan home to receive the grant.
The Skilled Regional Relocation Incentive, offering $10,000, is also closing today after commencing this year.
A note on the Office of State Revenue website says that despite the closing of these grants, the Government is considering a re-introduction of the Skillled Regional Relocation Incentive, with applications backdated to 1 October 2014. The Regional Relocation Home Buyers Grant, however, will not be re-introduced.
"The Regional Relocation Home Buyers Grant has not been as effective in meeting the Government’s objectives as the Skilled Regional Relocation Incentive. For this reason, the Government is ending the Regional Relocation Home Buyers Grant. As the Regional Relocation Grants Act 2011 does not provide for partial closure of the scheme, both schemes must be closed," they explain.
If you've relocated prior to today and haven't yet applied, you are still able to provided you do so before 31 December 2015.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

New South Wales’ Regional Relocation Home Buyers Grant ends today

<html><body>
I wonder what media is going to do with the latest admission from the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) that it has been grossly under-estimating the number of first-home buyers in the market.
On Wednesday this week, the ABS posted an update on its "investigation to evaluate the robustness of estimates of loans to first-home buyers".
The investigation, it said, found that "some lenders experience difficulty reporting on loans where the buyers does not receive a first home owner grant".
This, as I pointed out in my column earlier this week (and commented throughout last year, as did other writers on Property Observer), is the nub of the matter. The ABS collects data from the banks on home loans, and the method of identifying a loan applicant as a first-home buyer has always been their application for the first home owner grant.
If the applicant does not apply for a grant, the system does not identify them as a first home buyer.
Since state and territory governments across Australia stopped providing grants for established properties, the number of grant applications has dropped significantly. The research shows that most first-time buyers opt for an established home (cheaper, usually with more land and often better located) over a new home – and therefore most first-home buyers are no longer receiving grants.
The banks no longer record them as first-home buyers.
Because of the under-estimation of first-home buyers, the ABS statistics on home loans have given the appearance that first-time buyers have almost vanished from the market.
Media has leapt on this as a recurring headline, giving rise to claims that young Australians have been priced out of the market – and then, as a natural progression, generating witch hunts to find someone to blame for the situation. Negative gearing benefits to local investors and the activity of foreign investors have been popular targets.
There have been thousands of articles written in the past 12-18 months about the demise of the Great Australian Dream, all based on a fundamental falsehood, created by the ABS miscount of first-home buyers.
It's a damning indictment on journalistic standards in this country that so few have picked up on this. Nobody thought to investigate. No one asked the most basic of questions. Media rushed en masse to the cheap and easy headline – the dream is dead because young Aussies can't afford to buy.
It took a simple phone call from my office in mid-2014 to extract an admission from the ABS that their figures on first-home buyers were wrong – and why they were wrong.
Just how wrong was demonstrated by the recent NAB survey which found that 25% of established homes sold are being bought by first-time buyers and that 24% of new homes are bought by first-timers.
Journalists and editors across Australia should be hanging their heads. But you can be sure none of them will. Nor will the many economists, analysts and commentators who have seized on the ABS figures to justify their attitudes on real estate issues (such as those with an anti negative gearing stance or those opposed to foreign investment in Australian real estate).
"Users are advised to exercise caution in using this data," the ABS said on Wednesday. That warning has come at least 12 months too late. Not that it will make any difference to some.
I would bet my house that next week there will be more articles in major newspapers repeating the fiction that first-home buyers are at an all-time low. And the week after. And six months from now. People won't let the facts get in the way of an entrenched attitude or an easy sound byte.
"ABS and APRA will continue to work with lenders to improve data quality," the ABS said this week. "In the meantime, from the December 2014 issue (to be released on 11 February 2015), estimates of loans to first home buyers will include an adjustment for under-reporting of loans where the buyer did not receive a first home owner grant.
"An Information Paper will be released on the ABS website on 4 February 2015 explaining changes to the method of estimating first home buyers' data and the extent of revisions.   The ABS will continue to update the method as lenders progressively improve their reporting."
Too little, too late. Australia is awash from misinformation on the real estate industry and the most extreme example has been the first-home buyer miscount and all the column inches of inaccurate comment and posturing it has generated.
Terry Ryder is the founder of <a href="https://hotspotting.com.au/" target="_blank">hotspotting.com.au</a>. You can <a href="https://mailto:ryder@hotspotting.com.au" target="_blank">email him</a> or follow him on <a href="https://twitter.com/hotspotting" target="_blank">Twitter</a>.
Terry will be participating in a webinar on 'The Best and Worst for 2015: Top 5 Hotspots and 5 Places to Avoid' on 3 February.
Click here to <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer" target="_blank">register now</a>.
 
 
 
</body></html>

terryryder-YECXbqmri2

First home buyers are still here, but good research has gone missing: Terry Ryder

<html><body>
RE/MAX Western Australia’s managing director Geoff Baldwin has spoken out against potential changes to current stamp duty dispensations for first home buyers, saying that if the relief was decreased or abolished there would be dire effects across the market.
 “The negative affect the ceasing of stamp duty relief for first home buyers would be extremely damaging however, when this segment of the market stagnates it ripples up through all price ranges and the effect would be crippling”, said Baldwin.
“If you take a line through New South Wales and Victoria where subsidies have been abolished, first home buyer activity has dropped to 8% and 12% respectively, compared to the current 22% in Western Australia (RP Data).
“Historically, in a healthy market, first home buyers account for around 25 to 30% of all buyers.
“The established home market has already taken a massive hit through the government’s recent actions in changing the First Home Owner Grant whereby those building new homes receive $7,000 and people buying established only $3,000.
“To abolish first home owner stamp duty concessions would be extremely short sighted as it will a negative impact the whole market and hence the Industry, just at a time where we are again experiencing some prosperity in the property sector.”
 
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Rumoured cuts to stamp duty relief for first home buyers would be “extremely damaging”: RE/MAX

<html><body>
NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s promise to tackle home ownership affordability is a welcome sign to first time buyers being pushed out of the market, according to HTW’s Month in Review: March 2017. 
The valuation firm says with just over 186,000 loans approved in NSW in 2016, the first home buyer formed a small market segment with almost 16,500 loans approved or less than 9 percent of the total mortgage pool.
First home owner grants have reduced as data from the Office of State Revenue shows that 9,391 grants worth $138 million were handed out in 2015/16 as opposed to the 32,574 grants worth $266 million paid in 2010/11, the report states.
“Sydney is widely considered the most expensive city within Australia and one of the most expensive to rent when compared with other states and territory capitals, making for a tough path to home ownership,” HTW says.
“Furthermore, it appears that NSW is the equal lowest for first home owner grants when compared to other states:
<ul>
<li>QLD – $20,000 for new builds valued up to $750,000</li>
<li>SA – $15,000 for new builds only, valued up to $750,000</li>
<li>WA – $15,000 for new builds, valued up to either $750,000 or $1,000,000 (depending on the location).</li>
<li>VIC – $10,000 for new builds only, valued up to $750,000</li>
<li>NSW – $10,000 for new builds only, valued up to $750,000</li>
</ul>
“Typical first home buyers may consider purchasing off-the-plan as it allows them to save money while the property is under construction which can typically take between two to three years.
“This has been a strategy adopted by many in the Sydney market hoping to achieve capital appreciation during the course of construction and ‘lock in’ a lower purchase price compared to the ‘on completion’ or settlement price.”
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Sydney first home buyers turning to off-the-plan: HTW

<html><body>
The NSW Opposition has promised a staggered stamp duty payments scheme for first home buyers if it wins government at the upcoming March election.
It was an undertaking revealed on the Channel 7/Daily Telgraph leaders debate in response to an audience question about what Luke Foley and Mike Baird would do to make it easier for first home buyers to enter the hot NSW market.
“Look at a scheme where people, rather than being charged 100 per cent of stamp duty upfront, they could pay it back in instalments over several years,” the NSW Opposition leader, Luke Foley suggested, seemingly foreshadowing a more detailed policy announcement.
Advising the key to lowering prices was increasing the number of houses built, Premier Mike Baird said he had introduced a scheme where first home buyers purchasing new dwellings under $550,000 are exempt from paying stamp duty.
Stamp duty is one of the big upfront costs in buying a house especially if the buyers don't wish to be corralled into buying a new house or flat.
<a href="https://www.apps08.osr.nsw.gov.au/erevenue/calculators/fhnh.php" target="_blank">Stamp duty is calculated</a> by applying a sliding scale of state government taxation, depending on the value of the property purchase.
The NSW first-time buyer concession in place for stamp duty is designed to make it easier for people to get their first home, but only news homes. 
NSW is probably the most generous state.
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
The scheme was established to assist eligible first home owners to purchase a new home or build their home by offering a $15 000 grant. The grant applies to new homes only and does not apply to the purchase of an established home, vacant land, business premises or a holiday house. The grant will reduce to $10,000 on 1 January 2016. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
The First Home New Home scheme commenced from 1 January 2012 and provides eligible purchasers with exemptions from transfer duty on new homes valued up to $550,000 and concessions for new homes valued between $550,000 and $650,000.
Eligible purchaser buying a vacant block of residential land to build their home will pay no duty on vacant land valued up to $350,000, and will receive concessions for vacant land valued between $350,000 and $450, 000.
 
 
</body></html>

First Home Owner Grant

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

First Home Owner Grant

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News