Emission Reduction

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
Corporate Australia is taking action on climate change. Most recently, at the UN Climate Summit, Atlassian cofounder Michael Cannon-Brookes announced the A$26 billion Australian software company’s commitment to <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/daviddawkins/2019/09/23/atlassian-billionaire-presses-united-nations-on-net-zero-emissions-pledge/#6fdba03d96b5" target="_blank">net zero emissions by 2050</a>.
Net zero pledges like this are becoming more common but currently there is no way to really track momentum towards net zero emissions across different sectors of the economy.
Now, a <a href="https://www.climateworksaustralia.org/net-zero-momentum-tracker" target="_blank">Net Zero Momentum Tracker</a> initiative has been established by ClimateWorks Australia and the Monash Sustainable Development Institute to track emissions reduction commitments made by major Australian companies and organisations, as well as state and local governments.
The tracker aims to place all commitments to net zero emissions in Australia in one place and evaluate how well they align with the Paris climate goals.
<h2>Property sector tracking towards net zero emissions</h2>
We began by assessing Australia’s property sector. Last week we released a <a href="https://www.climateworksaustralia.org/publication/report/net-zero-momentum-tracker-property-sector-report" target="_blank">report</a> examining all property companies listed in the ASX 200, plus all of those required to <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer" target="_blank">report their emissions</a> under the National Greenhouse and Energy Reporting Act.
Among the companies we looked at are Dexus, Mirvac, Stockland Corporation, GPT Group, and Lendlease. They develop, own or manage some of Australia’s largest corporate offices, commercial properties, retail centres, retirement villages, and residential developments.
The report found almost half – 43% – of Australia’s largest listed property companies have made commitments that closely align with the Paris Climate Agreement, aiming to achieve net zero greenhouse emissions before 2050 for their owned and managed assets.
Significantly, the six companies with the most ambitious net zero targets represent 36% of the ASX 200 property sector. Among these six, several major companies – Dexus, Mirvac, GPT Group, and Vicinity – are aiming for net zero emissions by 2030, demonstrating the business case for strong climate action.
<h2>Sector leaders can inspire copycat action</h2>
By highlighting what action organisations are taking and how, the Net Zero Momentum Tracker initiative aims to encourage more organisations to make and strengthen commitments to reduce their emissions, in line with the goal of net zero emissions by 2050.
For example, Australia’s largest owner and manager of office property, Dexus, has a comprehensive strategy for reaching its goal of net zero emissions across the group’s managed property portfolio. This includes reducing energy use, shifting to renewable electricity, electrifying their buildings, and reducing their non-energy emissions from waste, waste water and air conditioning.
Of particular significance is Mirvac’s pledge to be “net positive” by 2030. This means the company aims to go beyond net zero, reducing emissions by more than its operations emit. Mirvac has established an energy company to install rooftop solar on their commercial buildings and is selling power to occupants, among other initiatives. The company also has a “house with no bills” pilot project, to explore how their upstream indirect emissions can be minimised for residential developments.
Another major company, the GPT Group, has extended its commitment beyond the assets it owns and manages to all buildings it has an ownership interest in, including buildings it co-owns or does not manage.
These companies will get multiple benefits from their action, including reduced operating costs, better health and productivity for occupants, and increased sales prices, rents and occupancy rates.
<h2>Need to accelerate action</h2>
While many property companies are tracking in the right direction, none of the companies we considered had net zero targets which comprehensively covered all of their emissions – such as those from co-owned assets, their supply chains and investments.
There is still significant opportunity for property companies to strengthen their commitments towards net zero emissions. This requires targets which address the full scope of direct and indirect emissions within each company’s influence, supported by detailed plans to achieve this.
By making these public commitments to reduce emissions, the property sector is helping build momentum towards achieving this goal across the entire Australian economy.
The next assessments to be undertaken by the Net Zero Momentum Tracker initiative include the banking sector and state and local governments.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/124264/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;">
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/amandine-denis-99925" target="_blank">Amandine Denis</a>, Head of Research, ClimateWorks Australia, <a href="http://theconversation.com/institutions/monash-university-1065" target="_blank">Monash University</a>
This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/australias-biggest-property-companies-are-making-net-zero-emissions-pledges-now-we-can-track-them-124264" target="_blank">original article</a>.
Main picture source: AAP Image/James Ross
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Australia's biggest property companies are making net-zero emissions pledges – now we can track them

<html><body>
Investa Office Management (Investa) will pursue a net zero emissions target by 2040 across its $10 billion office portfolio and business operations.
It was part of its comprehensive carbon strategy launched this week.
As the first Australian property company to announce a Science Based Target, Investa aims to maintain its leadership position by tracking its performance against this globally recognised framework.
The Science Based Target initiative is a robust, globally recognised framework referencing the climate science requiring the world to limit global warming to 2 degrees above pre industrial levels.
This is in line with the 2015 Paris Agreement.
Nina James, general manager for corporate sustainability at Investa said Investa’s carbon reduction strategy charts a course to a net zero emissions profile by 2040.
"The strategy was formed via extensive collaboration with industry experts and staff and outlines Investa’s roadmap to achieving the target.”
Sighting global capital decarbonisation movements and an increasingly environmentally aware investment community, Investa has endorsed the ambitious plan to reduce emissions across the portfolio.
It references the influential Australian Sustainable Built Environment Council’s report, “Low Carbon, High Performance”, which advocates that the Australian property industry can achieve a net zero position by 2050 using current technologies.
"Having achieved a 56% reduction in emissions intensity since 2004, this Science Based Target will ensure we maintain our leadership position and set the pace for a low carbon future in office management," James said.
As part of the strategy, Investa is taking responsibility for its corporate value chain emissions (Scopes 1, 2 and 3), working towards a ‘whole-of-building-whole-of-life’ approach, that will see the progressive expansion of the net-zero target boundary in line with the Science Based Target review process.
Electricity and gas within Investa properties accounts for 99.6% of the greenhouse gas emissions across the Investa managed properties.
A net zero-carbon future will therefore address the carbon impact of Investa’s buildings in three key areas;
1. How the building is operated – Continual improvement in the operational performance of Investa’s buildings;
2. How the building is designed and constructed – With a focus on changing the building envelope to deliver further energy and emissions savings; and
3. How the building is powered – Sourcing zero-carbon options for residual power requirements.
The ‘whole-of-building-whole-of-life’ approach also includes measures relating to tenants, embodied carbon and occupant well-being within the performance management and reporting boundary, providing a holistic picture of performance.
"By pursuing these emission reduction actions, we believe we can change the conversation to include whole of building thinking, resulting in a change in the criteria by which leading performance is measured and showing the real benefits of Investa’s approach to upgrading and re- positioning existing buildings," James said.
Investa CEO Jonathan Callaghan said to continue to attract investment, Investa must position itself not only as a viable, but responsible investment option.
"A leader in this space, able to demonstrate a clear point of difference and capability in this sector."
"Sustainability leadership will help ensure we maintain access to shifting global capital flows, grow asset revenues, valuations and returns for current investors and support Investa’s overarching vision to be the clear market leader in Australian office.”
</body></html>

Investa to target zero net emissions by 2040

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/64052/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1"> GUEST OBSERVER
Energy upgrades in Australia’s buildings could deliver a quarter of Australia’s 2030 emissions reduction target. Improving energy performance through improved building design, heating and cooling systems, lighting and other equipment and appliances could also deliver more than half of our National Energy Productivity Target.
Progress has been slow, however, and our research shows that delay leads to lost opportunities and billions in wasted energy costs.
The new federal environment and energy minister, Josh Frydenberg, has an opportunity here to demonstrate the potential of his new merged role. Today in Canberra, Australia’s energy ministers are meeting for the first time since the election through the COAG Energy Council.
One item on the agenda will be the National Energy Productivity Plan (NEPP). It aims to improve energy productivity 40% by 2030. This involves increasing the economic value produced from each unit of energy consumed.
The NEPP contains a number of good measures relating to buildings. However, without stronger governance arrangements, more transparency and stronger and clearer public communication and engagement, there is a risk that these policy measures will simply slip between the cracks of multiple agencies, portfolios and jurisdictions in the building sector.
<h2>What can better buildings achieve?</h2>
Our research found buildings could help meet our climate and energy goals, as you can see in the charts below.
We found that improving energy efficiency in buildings could deliver 10% of our emissions target. Distributed energy (primarily rooftop solar) could achieve an extra 18 percent.
<a href="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160817-3592-1liiikj.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160817-3592-1liiikj.png" alt="">
<h4>
Potential contribution of built environment opportunities to 2030 national emissions target (MtCO2e) ClimateWorks Australia, May 2016
</h4>
The energy efficiency improvements could reduce energy use by 202 petajoules, or half of what would be needed to achieve the energy productivity target.
<a href="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160818-2498-ff9x64.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160818-2498-ff9x64.png" alt="">
<h4>
Potential contribution of built environment energy efficiency opportunities to 2030 National Energy Productivity Target (PJ)ClimateWorks Australia, May 2016
</h4>
<h2>The cost of delay</h2>
Despite the massive opportunity to reduce emissions from the building sector, overall progress to date has been slow.
Market leaders, particularly in the commercial office market, have achieved a radical change in their energy productivity and are recognised as global leaders in sustainable buildings. There are many examples of very high-performing or net-zero-emission buildings around Australia.
However, the market as a whole has improved its energy performance only 2% over the past decade for commercial buildings, and 5% for residential buildings. We are not currently on track.
Our report found that continuing to delay action to reduce emissions from buildings means we would lose a substantial amount of cost-effective options to improve energy performance. Many emissions reduction opportunities exist only for a certain period of time. For example, installing inefficient equipment instead of more efficient options effectively locks in excessive emissions for many decades into the future.
Just five years of delay could lead to A$24 billion in wasted energy costs and more than 170 million tonnes of lost emissions reductions by 2050. This is a very substantial loss, considering the current national emissions target aims to reduce emissions by 272 million tonnes by 2030.
Without additional action buildings would eventually consume more than half of Australia’s “carbon budget” by 2050. That would leave less than half for all other sectors of the economy, including emissions-intensive industries, transport, land and agriculture.
<h4><a href="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160817-3569-1mhmozw.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a></h4>
<img src="/images/2016/08/19/image-20160817-3569-1mhmozw.png" alt="">
<h4>
Cost of delay (MtCO2e) ClimateWorks Australia, May 2016
</h4>
<h2>Stronger policy</h2>
To realise the emissions reduction potential in the building sector, strong policy will be required to tackle the barriers to better energy performance for buildings. Our report recommended five key solutions as part of an integrated policy suite.
First, develop a national plan to co-ordinate policy and emissions-reductions measures to extend gains made by market leaders across the entire building sector.
Second, introduce mandatory minimum standards for buildings, equipment and appliances aligned with the long-term goal of net zero emissions.
Third, develop incentives and programs to motivate and support higher energy performance in the short to medium term.
Fourth, reform the energy market to ensure it supports cost-effective energy efficiency and distributed energy.
Finally, we need a range of supporting data, information, training and education measures to enable informed consumer choice and support innovation, commercialisation and deployment of new technologies and business models.
Implementing these policy measures would set Australia on a pathway to zero-carbon buildings and unlock the large potential for buildings to deliver improved health outcomes and more liveable and productive cities.
<h2>Unblocking barriers</h2>
Unfortunately, the opportunity to reduce emissions from buildings is blocked by strong barriers that require co-ordination between the Commonwealth, states and territories.
To address the complexity of this task, the NEPP needs stronger governance arrangements, including a specified target or targets for buildings, to complement the overall 40% NEPP target, and more regular public reporting (there is no public review until 2020).
Stronger and clearer communication and engagement around the target and buildings’ energy performance within it would also help provide confidence and drive innovation and activity among households and businesses.
In addition, we need better co-ordination between the members of the Energy Council, and between the council and other government forums and agencies.
For example, the National Construction Code, which regulates minimum standards for new buildings and major refurbishments, is a critical policy lever. However, the code is overseen by the Building Ministers Forum, not the Energy Council, while a range of different state and territory bodies oversee enforcement of the standards.
There are similar issues around harmonising of different energy performance ratings across jurisdictions, co-ordinating training and accreditation of professionals throughout the building design and construction sector, and energy market reform to establish a level playing field for energy efficiency and decentralised renewable energy.
Co-ordination of these issues should be a major focus for the Energy Council. The new minister for environment and energy – as the minister responsible for delivering on both our national emissions reduction targets and on the productivity plan – is now in a unique position to lead these efforts. We encourage the COAG Energy Council to support him in this.
Eli Court is implementation manager, Climateworks Australia, Monash University and author for The Conversation. He can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/eli-court-181595" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Emission Reduction

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Emission Reduction

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News