Retirement Living

Lendlease has just released a collection of penthouse residences at their five-star luxury retirement living community, Ardency Kennedy Place.&nbsp;

The release comes in high demand with two penthouses already sold in the release.&nbsp;

Just five penthouses remain, presenting the final chance retirees have to secure a luxury residence within Lendlease’s highly coveted intergenerational living precinct, located on the former site of the Channel Nine studios.

<img alt="Render inside one of the penthouse apartments." data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="419047cf-a0e9-4325-ac25-71d96412dd7c" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/BM_RenderCamera13%2BInterior%2BLiving.jpg?VersionId=__nItUmwv6SaKISkVHbBIQuHzRTr2rnY" />

“The demand for these penthouses at Ardency Kennedy Place has been strong with two already sold and only five penthouses remaining,” Nathan Cockerill, Managing Director, Retirement Livingat Lendlease,&nbsp;said.&nbsp;

Designed by award-winning architects Bates Smart, the luxury two and three-bedroom penthouses feature high quality fixtures and finishes, with generously proportioned living spaces and natural light maximised throughout.&nbsp;

The penthouses are located on the top floors and boast sweeping views of the city or the Dandenong Ranges, with the largest three-bedroom penthouse benefitting from dual aspect views with an impressive 229 sqm interior floorplan.

Bates Smart, Director, Mark Healey, said the penthouse apartment layouts have been developed around enhancing liveability, specifically in the retirement context.

“A generosity of social spaces such as kitchens and adjoining living spaces encourages gatherings of friends and extended families and whilst ensuring bathrooms and storage is maximised to mimic the family home,” he said.&nbsp;

All of the residences include natural stone finishes, European timber flooring, ample storage, with some also including a built-in fireplace.&nbsp;

“The colour palettes are warm and neutral, with a focus on natural, quality luxury finishes. These penthouse residences present as timeless and classic interiors allowing for individual expression to be overlaid.”

The penthouse residences are priced from $1.55 million to $3.38 million, and the interiors range in size from 104 to 229sqm, each with a spacious terrace and two car spaces.&nbsp;

<img alt="Render inside one of the penthouse apartments." data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="73d39bff-ce52-4e58-9757-532ee27da163" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/BM_RenderCamera10%2BInterior%2BLiving.jpg?VersionId=ScO0QsMhGSFAN8E.GAkCfWsx288qzC9S" />

Purchasers will have the opportunity to meet with a Bates Smart architect for a personalised walk-through of the design of their residence and will be offered a complimentary design consultation with luxury furniture retailer Coco Republic for ideas on how to furnish and style the home.&nbsp;

Ardency Kennedy Place is Lendlease’s five-star luxury retirement living community that features an onsite café and provedore, as well as a wellness centre that features a pool, gym and yoga studio.&nbsp;

Future residents will also benefit from amenities on their doorstep and proximity to restaurants, cafes and boutiques on Swan Street, and easy connection to the rest of the city.&nbsp;

The precinct is targeting a 6 Star Green Star Communities rating from the Green Building Council of Australia, representing a world standard in sustainable design.&nbsp;

Construction of Ardency Kennedy Place has moved into the next stage following structural completion in August and is expected for completion in early 2023.&nbsp;

Ardency Kennedy Place also has a range of other two and three-bedroom apartments available priced from $1 million.

[smartcode_project_cta:default project_id=109599]

alisonwarters@gmail.com

Lendlease launch luxury penthouse collection in Richmond retirement community, Ardency Kennedy Place

Sydney developer Hyecorp has turned the first sod in their redevelopment of Club Willoughby.

They'll be transforming the transforming underutilised site into a retirement living facility, with the $95 million project 10 years in the making.&nbsp;

Known as the Heart of Willoughby, the redevelopment will see the 52-year old building replaced with a new state-of-the-art Club Willoughby, along with a 126-apartment retirement community and aged care facility, dubbed Hyegrove Willoughby.&nbsp;

A mix of one, two and three-bedroom apartments will be on offer, ranging in size from 55 sqm to 176 sqm internally, each with their own balcony or courtyard.&nbsp;

<img alt="Render of the living room in a Hyegrove apartment" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9e5bddef-1fa9-4045-a88c-ec855db17408" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Hyegrove%20Living%20Room.jpg?VersionId=juXej5ye4yu8E3OBmnQMGlWQp4sWQepc" />

Off the plan purchasers will also have the unique opportunity to custom design their apartment with add-ons such as heated flooring, wallpaper, pendant lights, and smart home automation systems.

In addition, 45 luxury care suites will be set up as three small ‘homes’ with kitchens, dining rooms and lounge areas designed to feel like a family home rather than a traditional aged care facility.&nbsp;

The contemporary mixed-use project in the geographical centre of Willoughby will also feature 2000 sqm of open space including memorial gardens.&nbsp;

While the Club will retain ownership of the land, a long-term lease will be granted to Hyecorp who will operate the over-55s village.

<img alt="Render of the entry to Hyegrove" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="afaacdf0-3f56-4111-91fd-8125bbd1cdd3" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Hyegrove_Entry_4k.jpg?VersionId=Zjb55uxZlXqT3YHrk56t.dA1hhKTbp9L" />

Set over three levels, the new look Club Willoughby will offer a range of dining, function and event experiences under one roof.&nbsp;

Residents of the 126-apartment retirement community will have access to a concierge service, complimentary basic groceries, meal preparation assistance, a laundry service, and an on-site building manager.&nbsp;

A suite of amenities will also be developed for the community, including an indoor swimming pool, beauty salon, cinema, wine-tasting room, gym and pilates studio.&nbsp;

Managing Director of Hyecorp, Stephen Abolakian, said both Hyecorp and the Club shared a common goal for members, future residents and the local community.

<img alt="Render of the lobby lounge at Hyegrove" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="9cf2d2b3-4715-43b1-8678-9b151e52e011" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Hyegrove_Lobby%20Lounge_4k%5B80%5D.png?VersionId=TTJPcqqOPrfOOgEaCS_slseXZzX6JGUr" />

“Our vision is to create a state-of-the-art showcase for the suburb of Willoughby offering a range of facilities and services for community members of all ages,” he said, adding that the addition of retirement living will cater to residents seeking a hassle-free future.

“As people age and require more services and help, we can provide whatever they need whether it is having the heavy laundry done or meals delivered, that level of care can be dialled up or down. It’s about putting the control into their hands, a characteristic that is too often not available to people living in retirement communities or aged care facilities,” he said.

Club Willoughby President Matt Vertzonis said while the road to discovering The Heart of Willoughby had been long, the result will be a dynamic new premises for members, residents and the greater community.

<img alt="Render of the pool at Hyegrove" data-entity-type="file" data-entity-uuid="801a56e5-a214-4e75-bb28-35ac8f64a1b8" src="https://s3.ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/inline-images/Hyegrove_Pool_4k%5B40%5D.png?VersionId=TUvB84KzuW95f47acXEhkMKYzXpfoG8v" />

The five-star inclusions at Hyegrove Willoughby are a result of local community consultation, with locals invited to have their say on what services and amenities they wished to see at the site.

Stage one of Hyegrove Willoughby has already sold out, with stage two now selling.&nbsp;

With construction underway, the project is slated for completion by late 2024.&nbsp;

Hyecorp begin redevelopment of Club Willoughby

Woodlea&rsquo;s vision for an innovative community for like-minded retired, semi-retired and working downsizers within the growing master-planned community is now one step closer following the official settlement of the 7.1-hectare&nbsp;site to Lifestyle Communities.

Touted as a mini-city in the suburbs, Woodlea is a fully integrated master-planned community by Victoria Investments and Properties (VIP) and Mirvac that&nbsp;will be home to an industry-leading downsizer precinct to complement Woodlea&rsquo;s range of residential offerings.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=28733 project_image_fid=167736]

The site is co-located within the Woodlea Town development and will comprise around 180 units as well as a clubhouse, indoor pool, bowling green and a host of other outdoor entertainment facilities.

Woodlea Project Director Matthew Dean said Lifestyle Communities closes the loop on ensuring every age and demographic is catered for within the community.

&ldquo;There are retirement units within the surrounding area but there is nothing of this size or calibre that integrates different living options within the same precinct, catering to working, semi-retired and retired downsizers.&quot;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=28733 project_image_fid=167735]

&ldquo;Woodlea is unlike any other master-planned community due to its sheer size and diverse offering and as it continues to flourish and more amenities are delivered, we are continually looking for ways to innovate to ensure it is responding to the needs of its residents and the surrounding communities,&quot; Dean said.&nbsp;

&quot;The Lifestyle Communities site will offer a residential offering to cater to downsizers looking to maintain healthy social connections, while also living in a high quality community. It will also assist members of the community to maintain close living connections with older family members, collectively improving their health and wellbeing.&quot;

Lifestyle Communities was chosen as a project partner due to its outstanding track record, as well as its shared vision of creating high-quality projects that improve the wellbeing of residents, Dean said.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=28733 project_image_fid=167737]

Lifestyle Communities Co-Founder and Managing Director James Kelly&nbsp;said the team are&nbsp;commitment to creating a community that&rsquo;s both sympathetic to the surrounding environs of Woodlea and fit for purpose for local downsizers.

&quot;We&rsquo;re especially keen to ensure we become part of the fabric of the Woodlea success story, with homes and facilities that complement those already in place.&quot;

Construction is scheduled to commence mid-year with staged completions to occur over the next few years.

[smartcode_project_cta: project_id=28733]

The site is co-located within the Woodlea Town development and will comprise approximately 180 units as well as a clubhouse, indoor pool, bowling green and a host of other outdoor entertainment facilities.



Lifestyle Communities to deliver downsizer precinct in Woodlea masterplan

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
Australia is ranked in the top third of countries in almost all indices measuring the best countries to retire, according to our analysis of nine separate ageing and retirement indices.
The problem is, experts contriving such indices can’t agree about which ingredients should be included and which are most important.
The flaw of averages
While composite ageing indices provide us with what appear as simple comparisons, the underlying methodologies are complex, prone to judgement, and can be tweaked to obtain certain results.
Using indicators that aggregate outcomes for the older population within a country also ignores differences between people within this population. Sub-indices by gender and more granular age-groups do exist, but one improvement could include an inequality adjustment based on outcomes by socioeconomic status or income.
What about just asking people about their life? Studies that compare differences in people’s own evaluations of life across countries show these are substantially explained by social and economic differences across countries. And when comparing individuals in high-income countries such as Australia and Britain, good physical and mental health appear most correlated with life satisfaction, while in middle-income countries like Indonesia, income is more important.
But that doesn’t differentiate by age. When the OECD asked older people across rich countries what mattered to them, they said that “health” and “environment” were most important while “civic engagement”, “community” and “income” domains were less so. By contrast, younger groups attributed less weight to “environment” and more to “income”.
Such indices usually involve scoring a country in several categories and combining these into a composite score and ranking. Done well, these can reveal how life in one location is better than another and in which categories it is lagging.
So what do existing indices suggest is important for older people’s well-being? And which countries come out on top?
Ingredients for a good old age
The ingredients used in an overall index differ, ranging from the employment rates of older people in each country, to their political participation, income, levels of exercise, and life expectancy.
These indicators and weights are often chosen subjectively by experts constructing each index. Some comparisons focus on current standards of living and comprise social, environmental, health, and economic indicators. These are probably more immediately relevant to people.
By contrast, indices that aim to measure the likely future for older people mostly comprise financial indicators and those that relate to retirement income system design, demography, and economic conditions. These are probably of greater concern for those thinking ahead about the impacts of population ageing.
Where to retire?
Despite the flaws with such comparisons, few people can help themselves. So how does your country rank?
European countries – particularly Nordic ones – are consistently highly ranked across ageing indices (see figure below). Such results reflect their high health outcomes, high incomes, generous social welfare, and comparatively well-designed retirement income systems. These are also countries that top the subjective happiness rankings.
Lower and middle-income countries receive lower rankings from the current well-being indices in which they feature. India and China, where there is low public provision for retirement, occupy high rankings among indices that emphasise fiscal sustainability over the quality of life of older people.
Australia is ranked in the top third of countries in almost all indices. It ranks particularly highly in the Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index, largely due to the design of its retirement income system.
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/91573/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">For what it’s worth, one could take an index of these indices to summarise. Such an index, call it the CEPAR meta-index of ageing, indeed shows Nordic countries taking the top three places, followed by Australia and the US, with the UK coming somewhere in the middle of 25 countries – apparently well ahead of places like France and Italy. Something to ponder when contemplating the good life in old age.
Rafal Chomik, Senior Research Fellow, ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research (CEPAR), UNSW
David Rodgers, PhD Student in Economics, UNSW
This article was originally published on <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a>. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/australia-is-one-of-the-worlds-best-places-to-retire-or-is-it-91573" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Is Australia really one of the world's best places to retire? 

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVATION
All humans have fundamental needs. These are physiological (food, drink, clothing, sleep), safety (emotional security, physical safety, health), love and belonging (friendships, community), esteem (respect, dignity) and self-actualisation (accomplishment, personal development).
For people living in Australia’s residential aged-care facilities, these needs are often not met.
Most residents do not feel they are loved or belong in the facility. Like aged-care resident Neda Borenstein, whose secret camera footage broadcast on ABC’s Four Corners showed her singing the Australian national anthem in bed while she waited more than three hours to be changed. “I’m just a number,” Neda told her carer when she finally returned to help her up.
Less than one-third of residents we interviewed said they were friends with another resident. This means most don’t have the social support associated with friendships. Most residents said they felt socially isolated, which is associated with poor well-being.
A 2016 study of residents’ lived experiences in an aged-care facility found many felt they had little dignity, autonomy or control. Outside of meal and structured activity times, people with dementia spend most of their time stationary, alone and doing very little or nothing.
One study looking at interactions between residents and their carers showed residents were alone 40% of the time they were observed. When staff were present, they mostly did not engage verbally, emotionally or physically with the resident.
Aged-care facilities can also feel psychologically unsafe to residents. Residents with dementia may be locked in secure units or physically restrained, using mechanisms such as bedrails or restraining belts.
Residents sometimes don’t get along. They might argue yell, swear, pinch, hit or push each other. We don’t have good data about how often resident-to-resident verbal and physical aggression happens, but it can result in injury and even death.
The consequences of unmet needs?
Residents can react negatively when their needs are not met. They become bored, sad, stressed, cranky, anxious, depressed, agitated, angry and violent.
In people with dementia, we used to call these reactions “behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia” (BPSD). But people with dementia have been pointing out these are normal human responses to neglect, not symptoms of dementia. Almost all (90%) aged-care residents display one or more of these negative reactions.
In many facilities, staff “manage” such reactions with the use of sedating antipsychotic medications. But clinical guidelines recommend looking at the reasons people may be reacting that way and addressing those before medication.
Half of nursing home residents have symptoms of depression, and a third have symptoms of anxiety. More than half of residents have been found in studies to behave in ways that might suggest they no longer wish to live. This includes refusing food or medication, one-third of residents having suicidal thoughts and a small number of nursing home residents actually taking their own lives.
Why does Australian aged care fail to meet fundamental human needs?
We might not be spending enough on aged care to enable providers to meet fundamental human needs. Australia spends about 1% of its GDP on long-term care – less than the OECD average of 1.5%.
Private investment in aged care is growing, as have residential aged care profits, but it’s a difficult industry in which to make money. Insufficient funding translates to insufficient staff and less skilled staff. Our funding system rewards dependency, and there are no funding incentives for providers to improve the psychological well-being of residents, or go beyond that to help them flourish.
People looking for a nursing home don’t have any independently provided information by which to compare quality or performance.
The National Quality Indicator Program – a program for measuring care in residential aged-care facilities that began in 2016 – was meant to provide information for people trying to compare facilities on clinical indicators of care quality.
But participation in the program is voluntary for providers. Neither quality of life nor emotional well-being indicators are included in the suite of quality indicators (even though one has been trialled and found to be suitable). We also don’t know if or when the data might be published.
What is needed?
We need a fundamental shift in community, government, service provider, staff and regulatory expectations of what residential aged care does. Our model of aged care is mainly about clinical care, while neglecting emotional care.
For instance, friendships are a unique social interaction that facilitate healthy ageing, but many residents told us that the social opportunities in their nursing home did not align with their expectations of friendship.
We need our model of care to be a model of a home. In a home everyone contributes, has a say in what happens in the home (such as the menu, interior design, routine and functions), is able to invite their friends to their home for a meal, and can leave during the day and come back at night. A home is a safe place, where people are loved and nurtured, and where they can be active and fulfilled.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/103336/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1" style="border: none !important; box-shadow: none !important; margin: 0 !important; max-height: 1px !important; max-width: 1px !important; min-height: 1px !important; min-width: 1px !important; opacity: 0 !important; outline: none !important; padding: 0 !important; text-shadow: none !important;">
Lee-Fay Low, Associate Professor in Ageing and Health, University of Sydney
This article is republished from <a href="http://theconversation.com" target="_blank">The Conversation</a> under a Creative Commons license. Read the <a href="https://theconversation.com/how-our-residential-aged-care-system-doesnt-care-about-older-peoples-emotional-needs-103336" target="_blank">original article</a>.
</body></html>

How our residential aged-care system doesn’t care about older people’s emotional needs

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
Residential aged care facilities should be more like a home and less like a hospital.
Most older people <a href="http://www.who.int/mental_health/publications/dementia_report_2012/en/" target="_blank">want to stay at home</a> as long as they can. When this is no longer possible, they move into residential aged care facilities, which become their home. But Australia’s care facilities for the aged are growing in size and becoming less home-like.
In 2010–11, 54% of residential aged care facilities in major Australian cities had <a href="https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/aged-care/residential-aged-care-in-australia-2010-11/contents/table-of-contents" target="_blank">more than 60 places</a>, and the <a href="https://www.pc.gov.au/inquiries/completed/aged-care/report/aged-care-overview-booklet.pdf" target="_blank">size of the average facility</a> is growing.
Today, more than 200,000 Australians live or stay in residential aged care on any given day. There are <a href="https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/Topics/Services-and-places-in-aged-care" target="_blank">around 2,672 such facilities</a> in Australia. This equates to an average of around 75 beds per facility.
Large institutions for people with disability and mental illness, as well as orphaned children, were once commonplace. But now – influenced by the 1960s <a href="https://psychcentral.com/encyclopedia/deinstitutionalization/" target="_blank">deinstitutionalisation</a> movement – these have been closed down and replaced with smaller community-based services. In the case of aged care, Australia has gone the opposite way.
Why is smaller better?
Evidence shows that aged care residents have better well-being when given opportunities for self-determination and independence. Internationally, there has been a <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1525861016300482" target="_blank">move towards</a> smaller living units where the design encourages this. These facilities feel <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743545" target="_blank">more like a home</a> than a hospital.
The <a href="http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186463/9789240694811_eng.pdf;jsessionid=731A680E51575BBDBEC07AFC9C449F23?sequence=1" target="_blank">World Health Organisation</a> has indicated that such models of care, where residents are also involved in running the facility, have advantages for older people, families, volunteers and care workers, and improve the quality of care.
In the US, the <a href="https://www.thegreenhouseproject.org/resources/research" target="_blank">Green House Project</a> has built more than 185 homes with around 10-12 residents in each. Studies show Green House residents’ enhanced quality of life doesn’t compromise <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26743545" target="_blank">clinical care</a> or <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21158746" target="_blank">running costs</a>.
Older people have a better quality of life if they can be involved in outdoor activities.
Around 50% of residents living in <a href="https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/Resources/Factsheets-and-infographics/Care-needs-factsheet.pdf?ext=" target="_blank">aged care facilities</a> have dementia. And <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1471301214532460" target="_blank">research has shown</a> that a higher quality of life for those with dementia is associated with buildings that help them engage with a variety of activities both inside and outside, are familiar, provide a variety of private and community spaces and the amenities and opportunities to take part in domestic activities.
In June 2018, an <a href="https://theconversation.com/caring-for-elderly-australians-in-a-home-like-setting-can-reduce-hospital-visits-97451" target="_blank">Australian study</a> found residents with dementia in aged-care facilities that provided a home-like model of care had far better quality of life and fewer hospitalisations than those in more standard facilities. The home-like facilities had up to 15 residents.
The study also found the cost of caring for older people in the smaller facilities was no higher, and in some cases lower, than in institutionalised facilities.
There are some moves in Australia towards smaller aged care services. For example, aged care provider <a href="https://www.wintringham.org.au/" target="_blank">Wintringham</a> has developed services with smaller facilities for older people who are homeless. Wintringham received the <a href="https://www.wintringham.org.au/built_environment" target="_blank">Building and Social Housing Foundation World Habitat Award 1997</a> for Wintringham Port Melbourne Hostel. Its innovative design actively worked against the institutional model.
Bigger and less home-like
Historically, nursing homes in Australia were small facilities, with <a href="https://www.anu.edu.au/fellows/jbraithwaite/_documents/Articles/The%20Nursing%20Home%20Industry.pdf" target="_blank">around 30 beds</a> each, often run as family businesses or provided by not-for-profit organisations. Between <a href="https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/lcdocs/other/9768/Aged%20care%20industry%20facts.pdf" target="_blank">2002 and 2013</a> the proportion of facilities with more than 60 beds doubled to 48.6%. <a href="http://www.stewartbrown.com.au/images/documents/StewartBrown---ACFPS-Residential-Care-Report-March-2017.pdf" target="_blank">Financial viability</a> rather than quality of care drove the increase in size.
Today, around 45% of <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer" target="_blank">facilities are operated</a> by the private for-profit sector, 40% by religious and charitable organisations, 13% by community-based organisations, 3% by state and territory governments, and less than 1% by local governments.
In 2016, the <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/property-observer" target="_blank">Australian Institute of Health and Welfare</a> (AIHW) reported that residential care services run by government organisations were more likely to be in small facilities. One-fifth (22%) of <a href="https://www.gen-agedcaredata.gov.au/www_aihwgen/media/2017-Factsheets/Services-and-Places-Factsheet-2016%E2%80%9317_2.pdf?ext=.pdf" target="_blank">places in these facilities</a> are in services with 20 or fewer places. Almost half (49%) of privately-run residential places are found in services with more than 100 places.
All of this means that more older Australians are living out their last days in an institutional environment.
Once larger facilities become the norm, it will be difficult to undo. Capital infrastructure is built to have an <a href="https://agedcare.health.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1426/f/documents/09_2016/2016_report_on_the_funding_and_financing_of_the_aged_care_industry_2.pdf" target="_blank">average 40-year life</a>, which will lock in the institutional model of aged care.
The built environment matters. The royal commission provides an opportunity to fundamentally critique the institutional model.<img src="https://counter.theconversation.com/content/103521/count.gif?distributor=republish-lightbox-basic" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
<a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/ralph-hampson-161263" target="_blank">Ralph Hampson</a> is the Senior Lecturer, Health and Ageing, University of Melbourne
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.
</body></html>

Australia's residential aged are getting bigger and less home-like: Ralph Hampson

<html><body>
Seniors living and aged care architect Marchese Partners has had two projects receive awards with the Mark Moran Vaucluse development in Sydney’s east was named the winner of the Excellence in Aged Care category at the UDIA NSW Awards for Excellence and Queensland's AVEO Clayfield nominated for the 2016 Best Over 50’s housing in the Global Awards.
Both were launched in  2016.
Marchese Partners’ chairman Eugene Marchese said in Australia we are slowly seeing the rise of new seniors living and aged care developments.
“Developments like this are going to become standard practice for this demographic because for too long seniors had to put up with living in facilities that were designed in the 70s," he said.
“The retiring generation is giving the retirement living sector a shakeup.
“No longer are they interested in just putting up with the current stock, they’re demanding more.
“That’s why as designers and architects we have to provide them a product that is designed to their lifestyle, and the projects at Vaucluse and Clayfield have done exactly that.” 
The Mark Moran Vaucluse development features 176 suites and 14 independent living units encircling a Village Square, integrating retail, commercial, entertainment, and community facilities.
</body></html>

jonathanchancellor-7SQnKwU6yx

Mark Moran's Vaucluse seniors living development wins excellence awards

<html><body>
Queenscliff in Victoria is the most popular retirement hotspot in Australia, according to CoreLogic's latest report.
The property data firm says that 40% of the population in Queenscliff are retirees aged over 65.
With only 2,904 residents, the small council area of Queenscliff on the Bellarine Peninsula in southern Victoria, recorded the highest proportion of retirees aged over 65 years (40.3%) according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) population data.
The small council area of Quairading in Western Australia’s Wheat Belt region enjoyed the greatest house value growth over the year (+21.5%), followed by Shoalhaven in New South Wales (+15.3%).
Of the council areas that have recorded house value falls over the past year, the greatest falls have been recorded in Mount Remarkable in South Australia (-7.1%) and Flinders in Tasmania (-5.2%).
A review by CoreLogic of the ABS retiree population analysis highlights 50 council areas nationally are showing the highest proportion of residents aged at least 65 years of age.
Immediately noticeable by research analyst Cameron Kusher, is that not one of the 50 council areas listed is located within a capital city.
He said, “In fact, if we list all councils nationally by their proportion of residents aged at least 65, the first capital city area listed is Holdfast Bay in Adelaide with 23.1% of its residents at least 65 years old.
“Council areas within New South Wales and South Australia also dominate the list with each of these states having 13 entries on the list.”
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.08.51%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.08.51%20am.jpg" alt="">
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.09.16%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.09.16%20am.jpg" alt="">
<a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.09.25%20am.jpg" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/08/31/Screen%20Shot%202017-08-31%20at%2010.09.25%20am.jpg" alt="">
A further feature of Top 50 retiree area analysis is that these particular retiree-centric council areas tend to have significantly lower median house values than the individual state capital city housing markets.
Mr Kusher said, “This could be due to retirees moving to areas where housing is more affordable in order to free-up capital for them to enjoy their retirement, it could also be out of necessity due to the high cost of housing within most capital cities.
“The locations are also likely to be linked to lifestyle preferences, with a large number of the top council areas located in regional coastal areas.”
Looking at the value growth performance for houses across these top 50 regions, the data shows that generally the rate of growth has been lower than that of the larger capital cities. 31 of the 50 council areas listed have seen house values rise over the past year.
A two bedroom house at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-other-vic-queenscliff-126250406" target="_blank">43 Hesse Street</a>, Queenscliff (above) has been listed for between $1.1 million to $1.2 million.
The property last sold in 2013 for $800,000.
A three bedroom house at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-vic-queenscliff-125950502" target="_blank">4 Beach Street</a>, Queenscliff (below) has been listed for between $850,000 to $920,000.
It last sold for $732,000 in 2015.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/09/04/4%20Beach%20Street.jpg" alt="">
A two bedroom unit at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-apartment-vic-queenscliff-125006542" target="_blank">16/30-32 Hesse Street</a>, Queenscliff (below) has been listed for between $350,000 to $385,000.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/09/04/16_30-32%20Hesse%20Street.jpg" alt="">
Another two bedroom unit at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-apartment-vic-queenscliff-125456486" target="_blank">1/42 Gellibrand Street</a>, Queenscliff (below) has been listed for sale.
It last sold in 2009 for $1.65 million.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2017/09/04/1_42%20Gellibrand%20Street.jpg" alt="">
Cameron Kusher is research analyst for CoreLogic. You can contact him <a href="https://blog.corelogic.com.au/about/" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

Queenscliff ranks atop the 50 most popular retirement regions in Australia: CoreLogic

<html><body>
Australia is about to experience a ‘silver tsunami’ with the population aged over 65 growing at a rate never seen before, says the Property Council.
However, the booming demographic risks fewer and poorer housing options unless our state and territory governments do a better job of planning for housing for older Australians, including retirement villages.
The Retirement Living Planning Report Card, published by Urbis and commissioned by the Property Council of Australia, assesses states and territories on their performance in planning for seniors housing, with South Australia ranked first overall.
The Report Card includes four key recommendations for reform of planning to deliver better outcomes for the housing needs of older Australians:
<ul>
<li>Increase land availability</li>
<li>Support more commercially viable developments</li>
<li>Improve alignment with market needs</li>
<li>Elevate retirement living to state importance in planning schemes.</li>
</ul>
Ben Myers, executive director of retirement living at the Property Council, says with more than 3.7 million Australians aged 65 and over, it’s vital that age appropriate housing options exist in all parts of our major cities to meet increased demand.
“The Retirement Living Planning Report Card shows that our states, together with local governments, can provide a more strategic role in ensuring there is land available for forms of seniors housing, like retirement villages and other independent living communities,” Myers says.
“Issues such as zoning and overly restrictive height controls can inhibit the redevelopment potential of existing communities to ensure the expectations of Australian retirees are met.
“Without changes to planning policy and improved awareness at council level, seniors may find their choices limited, and be more likely to be stuck in homes that reduce their ability to stay independent and healthy.
“Retirees would benefit greatly from specific seniors housing policies and targets, to promote appropriate development, to ensure there are options available for people aged 65 and over.”
Kylie Newcombe, associate director at Urbis and author of the report card, says that when it comes to scoring planning systems, the scores are low overall with no single state standing out as an exemplar.
“We need to switch the mindset from planning as a barrier, to planning as an enabler," she says.
“Common hurdles to developing seniors housing are the ongoing competition for land, historic zoning and height restrictions, and a general lack of understanding of the market’s needs by authorities.
“Ideally, there would be a more flexible approach that is tailored to what seniors need and want,” Newcombe says.
 
</body></html>

Retirement Living

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Retirement Living

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News