Northern Territory

<html><body>
<img src="https://counter.theconversation.edu.au/content/65155/count.gif" alt="The Conversation" width="1" height="1">
GUEST OBSERVER
Katter's Australian Party federal MP Bob Katter said 30 percent of the Northern Territory's farmland and 22 percent of Tasmania's farmland is foreign-owned. Is that true?
Foreign ownership of Australian agricultural land is not new. Foreign cattle barons owned large areas of land in the Australian outback throughout much of the 20th century.
However, foreign investors' interest in large tracts of farmland, and the federal treasurer’s decision to block the sale of the S. Kidman and Co cattle properties to a Chinese buyer, have helped fuel public debate on the issue.
When the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) released a new Agricultural Land Register in early September, federal MP Bob Katter said that 30 percent of Northern Territory farmland and 22 percent of Tasmanian farmland is now foreign-owned.
Is that right?
Checking the source
The Conversation asked a spokesperson for Bob Katter for sources to support his assertion but did not hear back before deadline.
Nevertheless, it’s clear Katter was referring to the Australian Taxation Office’s new Register of Foreign Ownership of Agricultural Land.
The register lists investors who are legally required to report their interests in Australian agricultural land - whether that interest is freehold (meaning owned outright) or leasehold (meaning the land is rented).
Under rules announced in early 2015, investors must now notify the tax office within 30 days if they:
<ul>
<li>Are a foreign person starting to hold agricultural land</li>
<li>Are a foreign person ceasing to hold agricultural land</li>
<li>Become a foreign person while holding agricultural land</li>
<li>Cease to be a foreign person while holding agricultural land</li>
<li>Are a foreign person holding land that becomes agricultural land or</li>
<li>Are a foreign person holding land that ceases to be agricultural land</li>
</ul>
To build the register, the ATO collects investors' names, contact details, country of incorporation and Australian Business Number or equivalent identifier. For individual investors, the ATO recorded their nationality, and passport and visa details. It also collects the land title details.
The ATO report covers registrations made between July 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016.
What does the report show?
The report shows that the largest amount of foreign agricultural land is held by investors from the United Kingdom, in control of 27.5 million hectares. Investors from the the United States (7.7 million hectares) hold the second largest amount of land, followed by the Netherlands (3.0 million hectares). Chinese investors hold the fifth largest amount of land, with about 1.5 million hectares.
<a href="/images/2016/09/22/image-20160921-12468-1wprtdj.png" target="_blank">Click to enlarge</a>
<img src="/images/2016/09/22/image-20160921-12468-1wprtdj.png" alt="">
<a class="source" href="https://firb.gov.au/about/publication/register-of-foreign-ownership-of-agricultural-land/">The Conversation/Foreign Investment Review Board</a>, <a class="license" href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">CC BY-ND</a>
<h2>Leasing vs owning</h2>
Bob Katter correctly quoted the percentages from the report, but his wording wasn’t quite accurate. He didn’t differentiate between foreign-owned and foreign-leased land.
To be fair, though, it’s not unusual for land to be leased for long periods of time – even as much as 99 years. So in practice, the difference between owning and leasing may be moot. The register doesn’t specify the length of the leases, saying only that:
"An interest in agricultural land includes a freehold interest or the right to occupy land under a lease (including a sublease or licence) where the term of the lease or licence (including any extension or renewal) is reasonably likely to exceed five years."
What we do know is that the register shows that 30.1 percent of agricultural land in the Northern Territory and 21.8 percent of agricultural land in Tasmania is held by foreign interests.
The register shows that almost all of the foreign-held agricultural land in the Northern Territory is leased (but the register doesn’t say exactly how long the leases are).
In Tasmania, the numbers are very different. The register shows that of the farmland there that is held by foreigners, about 88 percent of it is freehold – meaning it is owned by a foreign interest.
Much of the land identified in the report, particularly in the Northern Territory, is likely to be Crown leasehold. This means ultimate ownership rights remain with the Australian government, and lessees are required to manage the land in line with Australian property, agricultural and environmental laws.
<h2>How does this compare to the past?</h2>
We don’t know for sure, because the ATO register is the first of its kind.
The main previous source of official data on this issue was the Australian Bureau of Statistics’ (ABS) Agricultural Land and Water Ownership Survey, run in 2010 and 2013.
The 2013 ABS survey found 12.4 percent of Australian agricultural land had some level of foreign ownership, saying that:
Of the 400 million hectares of agricultural land in Australia, nearly 50 million hectares had some level of foreign ownership; this is up by around 5 million hectares, an increase of 11 percent on the 2010 result.
The ABS reported 31.7 percent of Northern Territory farmland as foreign-owned in 2013. Unfortunately, the Tasmanian data from the 2013 survey was not published.
If we compare the ATO and ABS data, it appears that the percentage of foreign-held agricultural land in Australia increased slightly between 2013 and 2016. It also appears that the percentage of foreign-held farmland in the Northern Territory fell slightly.
But care must be taken when comparing the results from the ATO register and the ABS survey. The ABS survey presents estimates based on a sample of agricultural businesses listed in the ABS business register, and must be used with care because of potential sampling errors.
It’s likely that the ATO register reflects a more complete record of foreign ownership and leasing than the earlier ABS data.
<h2>What don’t we know about foreign control of agricultural land?</h2>
Not all the information collected by the ATO has been made public.
The publicly available report doesn’t show who owns the land – it doesn’t show what proportion of the foreign-held land is owned or leased by foreign governments or foreign government investors such as state-owned enterprises.
The register’s guiding legislation states that any publicly reported statistics must not identify investors, which limits what information the ATO can release for public perusal.
<h2>Verdict</h2>
Bob Katter got his figures right but his wording was not entirely accurate. It would have been more accurate for him to say that 30% of the Northern Territory’s farmland and about 22% percent of Tasmania’s farmland is now foreign-held – not foreign-“owned”.
In the Northern Territory, most of the foreign-held land is leased; in Tasmania most of that foreign-held land is owned outright by the foreign entity.
However, the register doesn’t include the length of land leases. For those tracts of land held under very long leases, the practical difference between owning and leasing may not be meaningful. – Erin Smith and Bill Pritchard.
<h2>Review</h2>
This is a sound FactCheck. I have independently confirmed all data and calculations used in the analysis. The authors are correct in confirming Katter’s claim, with the caveat that the term foreign “held” rather than “owned” should have been used.
Some further – and significant – qualifications of the ATO data can also be drawn out:
While Tasmania and NT have relatively similar overall levels, their sectoral patterns are qualitatively different. As the ATO data show, most foreign-owned land in NT is for livestock production, while in Tasmania nearly all is in the forestry sector.
The legal differences between ownership and leasing are very slight in terms of assessing control and legal compliance matters. While the authors claim that leaseholders are required to meet “all Australian property, agricultural and environmental laws”, this is equally true of freeholders as well.
The ATO report appears not to adjust for the share of a property held by a foreign interest. For example, it does not differentiate between a farm that is 20 percent foreign-owned and one that is 100% foreign-owned. It is possible that some or even much of the “foreign held” land is actually a minority share in a joint-venture with Australian partners.
Significantly, the report only identifies the “place of incorporation” of the investor, rather than the nationality of the ultimate owner. Much of the British and American interests may well be held by legal persons of third countries, who have incorporated businesses (or bought shares in property trusts) in these jurisdictions. The dominance of the US and UK might therefore reflect a practice of incorporating agribusinesses in these countries, rather than ultimate ownership residing there. – Jeffrey Wilson
Erin Smith is post-doctoral Research Fellow, University of the Sunshine Coast and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/erin-smith-94841" target="_blank">here</a>.
Bill Pritchard is professor in Human Geography, University of Sydney and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/bill-pritchard-126" target="_blank">here</a>.
Jeffrey Wilson is fellow of the Asia Research Centre, Murdoch University and can be contacted <a href="https://theconversation.com/profiles/jeffrey-wilson-12717" target="_blank">here</a>.
All are authors for The Conversation.
 
</body></html>

jchancellor-FAypfDUnLy

Is 30 percent of Northern Territory farmland and 22 percent of Tasmanian farmland foreign-owned?

<html><body>
The Northern Territory government has <a href="/expert-insights/buying/65-first-home-buyers/31152-northern-territory-s-fhog-directed-to-new-builds-only-from-2015" target="_blank">abolished its first home owners grant for established homes</a>, extending the grant only to new dwellings from January 2015.
While announcing the changes, Treasurer David Tollner acknowledged that first home owners grants have added upwards pressure on housing prices. The government cited economist Saul Eslake’s <a href="/news/28532-the-senates-inquiry-into-affordable-housing-six-submissions?start=1" target="_blank">submission to a Senate inquiry into affordable housing</a>. Eslake criticised the grant, saying that when applied to established homes, it "served to simply to exacerbate the already substantial imbalance between the underlying demand for housing and the supply of it."
According to Tollner, the unintended inflationary effects of the first home owners grant were a factor in the government’s decision to abolish the grant for established homes.
"That’s why the Territory government will direct the first home owners grant solely towards the construction or purchase of new homes from next year," said Tollner.
"By targeting the first home owners grant towards the purchase of newly built homes, the grant is more likely to contribute to growth in housing supply and employment in the construction sector."
The Territory government will maintain the payment for first home owners of established homes for eight months.
"...ultimately, we want this grant to encourage the construction of new homes, create more jobs in the residential construction sector and improving housing affordability by increasing housing stock." Tollner said.
"This is a far better result than merely creating a churn in existing dwellings that is widely accepted as having an inflationary effect on the cost of housing."
Eslake is not the first industry figure to criticise the first home owners grant. Writing on the grant last year, <a href="/expert-insights/buying/65-first-home-buyers/23442-wednesday-june-12-observer-slow-demise-of-first-home-owner-grant-schemes-wakelin" target="_blank">observer Monique Sasson commented</a>:
"The scheme is meant to make property more affordable for first home buyers. Unfortunately, experience shows that the grants don’t achieve this end.  Instead, the nominal increase in purchasing power it delivers to first home buyers transmits directly into higher prices for the properties they hope to buy.
"The real beneficiaries are the vendors of properties that first timers buy."
The Northern Territory follows Victoria, New South Wales, Queensland and the Australian Capital Territory in its removal of the first home owners grant for established properties.
 
 
</body></html>

jrichardson-uRX5hFdKfN

Northern Territory government acknowledges that FHOGs for established houses have "inflationary effect"

<html><body>
As of 1 January 2015, Northern Territorians looking to buy their first home will only be able to get the First Home Owners Grant if they buy new, under recently announced changed.
The current property value limit of $600,000 will be removed, and the value of the grant for building or buying new homes has increased $1,000 to $26,000.
These changes are in effect as of tomorrow.
Dave Tollner, treasurer, said that the removal of the value limit will remove the requirement that the buyer pay for a valuation of the property.
“These are practical changes that will make the grant more appealing and flexible to first home buyers that are buying or building new homes,” Tollner said.
At the moment, a $12,000 grant can be obtained for established dwellings in an urban area, or in Darwin, Palmerston and Litchfield. A $25,000 grant is available for those outside of the urban area.
These grants for established homes will be gone from next year, with hopes of stimulating new home construction and to encourage a take up of the accelerated land releases.
“By targeting the first home owners grant towards the purchase of newly built homes, the grant is more likely to contribute to growth in housing supply and employment in the construction sector,” said Tollner.
Those looking to buy an existing dwelling have an opportunity for the next eight months to take advantage of the existing grant.
“This will ensure an orderly transition and allows buyers who are currently in the process of buying a home, or intending to do so in the near future, with sufficient opportunity to take advantage of the FHOG as part of that purchase until the end of the year,” he said.
“But ultimately, we want this grant to encourage the construction of new homes, create more jobs in the residential construction sector and improving housing affordability by increasing housing stock.”
In announcing this decision, the government acknowledged that providing a grant for existing property is <a href="/expert-insights/buying/65-first-home-buyers/31161-northern-territory-government-acknowledges-that-fhogs-push-up-house-prices" target="_blank">“widely regarded” as contributing to higher property prices</a>, noting economist Saul Eslake’s comments.
</body></html>

jduke-EHk3XBmHkn

Northern Territory’s FHOG directed to new builds only from 2015

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
Years ago I lived up in Darwin.
It's a cool place - at least figuratively, if not literally - and certainly very different from the sometimes drab sameness of suburban life in the big smoke.
One of the things I liked about it was how almost everyone turns out when there's an event in town, such the V8 Supercars and INXS playing live (or whatever). 
Mindil Beach Sunset Markets quite rightly attract a buzzing crowd every weekend too.
Meanwhile, the National Parks of Kakadu and Litchfield are a must-see-to-believe, especially in the Big Wet (although most Aussies talk of there being two seasons - wet and dry - Kakadu's traditional owners recognise six different seasons, understanding the subtle transitions between them). 
The odd earthquake aside, Darwin has the best winter climate of any city I've experienced, perfect dry heat in the low 30s all day every day, and never a cloud to be seen.
The summer weather, on the other hand, can range from harsh humidity to downright brutal and Cyclonic. 
Although I love the place, I think it would be fair to say that a lack of diversity of choice is a net negative for the Top End, including within the labour force. 
There were stacks of jobs in resources and in the public sector during my time up north, but not very much else. 
Employment rates and full-time salaries are high, and official unemployment rates remain very low.
But the mining boom years have faded and people are steadily drifting back where they came from. Actually, not that steadily now...quite quickly!
I also recall simple things like going for a takeaway or a coffee being phenomenally expensive, although for all I know maybe that's changed as the mining sector has cooled. 
From boom to bust
From 2003 dwelling prices soared relentlessly in Darwin for a decade, rising by <a href="http://petewargent.blogspot.com/2018/09/aussie-housing-prices-roll-over-in" target="_blank">more than 180% </a>by the middle of 2014, by far the biggest increase of any of Australia's 8 capital cities over that period. 
Since the peak of the resources construction boom time prices have dropped back by 18%, including by 6% over the 2018 financial year alone. 
During the boom years thousands of Aussies were relocating from interstate up to the Top End lured by the high wages on offer.
But although the sector experienced a second wind post-financial crisis as China stimulated its economy, even the mighty $54 billion (hello overruns!) Inpex/Ichthys LNG project hasn't been enough to stem to the inevitable downturn.
And now the NT is losing residents interstate in droves, with more than 3,500 upping sticks on a net basis over the year to March 2018. 
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UgdR-OAUOdY/W6f2q74OalI/AAAAAAAAsDg/jmUlCLdlbjYUkkQQ-iR_IUK6LAK2lntLwCLcBGAs/s1600/NT.jpg"><img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-UgdR-OAUOdY/W6f2q74OalI/AAAAAAAAsDg/jmUlCLdlbjYUkkQQ-iR_IUK6LAK2lntLwCLcBGAs/s640/NT.jpg" width="640" height="388" data-original-height="792" data-original-width="1303"></a>
With life expectancy increasing, you typically see more births than deaths these days, so the population of Australia increases naturally even without its prevailing strong immigration program.  
But in the NT the outflow of residents interstate is overwhelming both net overseas migration and the natural increase, to the extent that the population of the territory has actually declined by 1,000 persons over the past six months to 246,700. 
There are few weaker dynamics for a housing market than an outright decline in the population, if sustained. 
No doubt the local authorities will be putting in place incentives to entice families to move up north. 
In short, arguably no state or territory presently has a more concerning range of metrics in its economy or housing market. 
In arrears
Last week I looked at how each of the most populous states is faring with regards to 30+ day <a href="http://petewargent.blogspot.com/2018/09/is-mortgage-stress-at-record-highs" target="_blank">mortgage arrears</a>.
In short, not great in Western Australia, pretty comfortable elsewhere. 
Let's now consider the other four states and territories.
As you might expect the NT had the highest rate of prime and non-conforming 30+ day arrears at 2.67% as at July 2018, although this had declined just a little over the preceding two months of available figures from 2.82%. 
<a href="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rvAjhgRkFvc/W6gIxt_GYhI/AAAAAAAAsDs/edpctyzujWY88YikjxsPXwprdIMDiPkCgCLcBGAs/s1600/S%2526P1.jpg"><img src="https://2.bp.blogspot.com/-rvAjhgRkFvc/W6gIxt_GYhI/AAAAAAAAsDs/edpctyzujWY88YikjxsPXwprdIMDiPkCgCLcBGAs/s640/S%2526P1.jpg" width="640" height="368" data-original-height="799" data-original-width="1389"></a>
Elsewhere arrears rates were reasonably low in South Australia at 1.50% following a marked improvement, very low in thriving Tasmania at 1.31%, and extremely low in the Australian Capital Territory at 0.74%. 
Generally mortgage arrears are a little higher than a year earlier across the board, despite falling unemployment rates, in part due to interest-only mortgages being reset.
Hopefully the NT can turn itself around soon! 
PETE WARGENT is the co-founder of AllenWargent property buyers (London, Sydney) and a best-selling author and <a href="https://petewargent.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">blogger</a>.
</body></html>

pwargent-M4siyDbqQY

Bottom falls out of Darwin in the Top End: Pete Wargent

<html><body>
A mortgagee home in Northern Territory’s Ludmilla has been listed for auction.
The three-bedroom, two-bathroom home is located at 38 Harney Street.
Its offerings include a nursery, full length side verandah and in-ground pool.
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/Screen%20Shot%202020-08-17%20at%203.56.51%20pm.png" alt="">
The property, located only 10 minutes to Casuarina, last traded for $850,000 in 2017.
The median house price for Ludmilla is $532,000, according to CoreLogic data.
PropertyShop estate agent George Vodros holds the listing.
The home is set to go under the hammer on Saturday, September 12 at 11am.
</body></html>

j.ballantyne1990-6AQqhLzZaK

Three-bedroom Ludmilla home set for mortgagee auction

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 63">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The Northern Territory is the safest location in the country, being the first state or territory to clinically eradicate COVID-19 and all confirmed cases having now recovered (Health Minister, Natasha Fyles) and no new notifications for some time now, according to the latest Herron Todd White (HTW) residential report. 
The valuation firm took a look at how a budget of $700,000 could be invested in property markets across the nation. 
 The borders have been locked down and travel into remote communities has been limited. These strong actions, the small population base and the adherence to the recommendations should position the Northern Territory to respond well in our economic recovery.
"How has this transitioned to the property sector?", the valuation firm asked. 
Whilst restrictions have now been eased and borders are set to reopen on 20 July, at the height of the crisis, leading local sales agents were reporting a stable level of interest for stock already on the market and open homes were replaced by private appointments – one agent noting that this had led to more qualified buyers coming through and less tyre kickers. 
Real Estate Central has shifted to online auctions using the Gavel app, resulting in a handful of sold dwellings. 
The private treaty sales campaigns have been successful with reigning REINT agent of the year Derek Hart of Elders Real Estate reporting strong activity with private treaty campaigns (source: NT News).
When considering the pipeline coming forward, it has been noted that appraisals are significantly down and the current activity is from pre-COVID-19 stock.
The report notes vendors requiring a result are still motivated towards sale, however for many the COVID-19 interruption has postponed planning to later in 2020 with a more cautious wait and see outlook.
<div class="page" title="Page 63">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
"With this activity we have not seen any market reductions that are out of line or increased market reductions as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that some market sectors have been performing quite poorly due to the wider market forces.
"Whilst job losses have hit much of the nation heavily, the Northern Territory is fortunately positioned due to a number of factors: we have over 21,500 public servants (source: The Office of the Commissioner for Public Employment), all of whom are still being fully paid and therefore have the ability to support their families," the valuation firm said. 
A further 5,500 are defence personnel (source: Department of Treasury and Finance). This equates to over ten per cent of the total population maintaining full employment.
In a positive for the market, long term residential tenancies have remained relatively firm.
 The larger agencies have indicated that requests for rent reduction remain quite low and rental arrears have not spiked. The short term tenancy market is very poor.
 Holiday makers have evaporated from the local scene and a number of short stay companies have noted that their forward bookings are very poor and that the 2020 dry season will be a difficult period.
</div>
<div class="column">
The government stimulus programs have been quite generous; approximately $100 million has been allocated to the Home Improvement Scheme, whereby the government will offer $4,000 with an owner contribution of $1,000 or $6,000 with an owner contribution of $2,000. 
This will help owners improve their properties, which may increase the value of their assets as we move past the COVID-19 slowdown.
 Recent federal government announcements about the Home Builder package (which sees eligible home owners pocket $25,000 on a $150,000 spend), coupled with existing Northern Territory government packages provides a total benefit of up to $45,000. 
"The impact so far is difficult to judge, however anecdotally some builders have seen a significant increase in enquiry," the valuation firm said. 
"So with that all said, where is the Northern Territory market? We are yet to see any firm market evidence that the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in lower rents or capital values. 
"The big test as we look through the forward lens is the speed at which the economy can recover following the easing of restrictions and border openings," the valuation firm said. 
The report notes as Victoria battles a surge in cases, the threat of an infection in the Territory remains very real and a second wave of infection would see confidence and market sentiment evaporate.
<div class="page" title="Page 64">
<div class="section">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
"The main theme for this month’s review focuses on a price point of $700,000 and which property types can be accessed at this level. The answer here in the Top End is - most," the valuation firm said. 
From a three-bedroom unit in the CBD with harbour views, to a four-bedroom, two-bathroom modern dwelling in the developing residential area of Muirhead, to a rural lifestyle property down the track with a shed with all the trimmings in Humpty Doo - this price point delivers some wide and varied property types. 
This has not always been the case and the extent of the growth experienced in the market between 2012 and 2015 and the subsequent cliff it has driven off since is well known.
A designer family home in Muirhead has recently been sold for $607,500.
The four bedroom, two bathroom house is situated at <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/sold/property-house-nt-muirhead-133923558" target="_blank">12 Saunders Street</a> (pictured below).
It features open plan living and dining area, covered alfresco patio, fenced backyard and double lock up garage. 
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2020/7/20/muirhead%202.jpg" alt="">
 
A current listing is a three bedroom apartment in Darwin City priced at $569,000.
The <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-unit-nt-darwin+city-133902662" target="_blank">4004/27 Woods Street </a>home (pictured below) comprises three bedrooms, two bathrooms, open plan living and dining area and corner balcony. 
It also features gourmet kitchen, study space, two-way storeroom and city views.
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2020/7/20/darwin.jpg" alt="">
Naturally, buyers cashed up and bringing a budget of $700,000 to the table are likely to see value for money especially compared to a number of years back. 
"It seemingly presents as an opportunistic time to purchase across many property types. It’s not only the safest place in Australia to live during a pandemic, but economically viable – how much worse can our economy get?
"Surely there is only upside in the Northern Territory – it’s a safe bet." 
</div>
</div>
<img src="blob:https://www.urban.com.au/239395f0-7dfa-46c9-aeeb-0702ada3db2a" alt="page64image5805856" width="0.500000" height="0.500000">
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

What a lazy $700,000 can buy in Northern Territory: HTW residential 

<html><body>
Longitude 131°, overlooking Uluru, is at Australia’s spiritual heart.
The Philip Cox -designed <a href="https://longitude131.com.au" target="_blank">Longitude 131° luxury wilderness camp at Uluru</a> has won acclaim for its eco-friendly intention, with tent-like suites dotted across the red dirt in the Northern Territory.
Its ownership sits within the indigenous-owned Ayers Rock Resort, that comprises five hotels bought by the Indigenous Land Corp from the listed GPT Group in late 2010 for $300 million.
It wasn't a straight sale but rather by instalments:
<ul>
<li>$81 million payment on settlement; 
</li>
<li>$81 million 12 months after settlement; and 
</li>
<li>$138 million five years after settlement.</li>
</ul>
The additional terms of the sale included GPT contributing $25 million towards capital expenditure to assist in the achievement of a higher value in which GPT may share. GPT will share in 46% of the increase in capital value of Ayers Rock Resort over $300 million.
GPT had opened it in 2002, with 12 of the 15 tents at the $9.4 million safari-style camp, then lost in a bushfire just 15 months after its launch.
Longitude 131°, on the edge of the Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (UKTNP), 10 kilometres from Uluru, had just been named by US magazine The Robb Report as among the world's top 10 new hotels.
It is now on a long-term management lease deal with Baillie Lodges, owned by entrepreneur Dick Smith’s daughter Hayley and her husband, James Baillie.
Prices have been at $2,200 per couple for a two-night food, drinks and accommodation package
Last year the Indigenous Land Corp’s tourism management arm managing director, Voyages' Koos Klein, the former Hilton executive, told the AFR that the Baillies "can do it better than we can do it. This gives us the opportunity to concentrate on our main resort where we employ 700 to 800 people, and where our focus is on indigenous employment and training."
After a downturn in tourism into the Northern Territory, the value of the resort was cut by $62 million last year, prompting the head of the Indigenous Land Corporation Dawn Casey to question the purchase of the Ayers Rock Resort telling Fairfax Media it was ''perhaps the largest single evaporation of public money in the indigenous policy domain, ever''.
Statistics from Parks Australia show visitors to Uluru declined by about nine per cent in 2011 to about 273,000 people. 
<div title="Page 1">
<div>
<div>
The majority of visitors to UKTNP surveyed were domestic visitors, while 31% of visitors were from overseas. 
<div title="Page 4">
<div>
<div>
International visitors were predominately from Germany; USA; other European markets including the United Kingdom, Netherlands and Switzerland; and New Zealand. 
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Before the Windsors visit, Longitude has hosted celebrities, including Oprah Winfrey. 
<div title="Page 1">
<div>Tourism to Ayers Rock began as an informal activity around the mid 1950s , when a series of unofficial camps evolved at the base, followed by a rough airstrip and eventually some low quality hotels and hostels. By the early 1970's visitor numbers were estimated to be close to 50,000 a year.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Visitor numbers hits over 75,000 per annum around the early 1980s when construction of Ayers Rock Resort commenced under the direction of the Conservation Commission of the Northern Territory.</div>
<div>
The existing hotels were compulsorily acquired by the Commonwealth Government, replaced on the new site by the new hotel.
The estimated costs of development were $600 million.
By 1984, visitor numbers had reached in excess of 130,000 a year.
Despite being operated by Sheraton and Four Seasons, the properties traded poorly.
In late 1997, General Property Trust purchased Ayers Rock Resort for $220 million. 
</div>
</div>
The Baillie Lodges collection of luxury lodges in wilderness destinations includes Capella Lodge on Lord Howe Island which launched the portfolio.
SA's Southern Ocean Lodge is also in the Baillie stable.
Last month James and Hayley Baillie abandoned plans to <a href="/expert-insights/investing/18022-baillie-lodges-reveals-ribbed-modernist-addition-to-proposed-boutique-hotel-in-victorian-era-the-rocks-in-sydney" target="_blank">develop a $1400-a-night hotel in The Rocks in Sydney</a>, citing a threefold increase in construction costs.
Construction costs had an initial quote of $8 million but we tipped to blow out to up $23 million, making it impossible to make the nine-suite hotel stack up financially.
“The hard, sad reality is we have become such an expensive country, where the cost of construction has gone through the roof, especially at the quality end of the market,” he told The Australian.
</body></html>

Longitude 131° at Uluru - glamping boost to follow Prince William and Kate visit

<html><body>
A 15 level apartment building planned for the Northern Territory’s Palmerston has been making news recently, with three levels of carparking, three levels of commercial/office use and eight levels of one and two bedroom units suggested.
The recent artist’s impressions and details, released through NT News, included a blank carpark wall for potential public artwork, a rooftop garden, some balconies and native plants for ‘green walls’ on the bottom section of the building.
They are expected to be between the library and Quest Apartments, on The Boulevard.
One bedroom apartments in Quest next door are renting for around $360 a night this time of year.
This development appears to fit very nicely with the requirements noted in the Palmerston City Centre 2030 Masterplan developed in 2012, that suggested an increase of residential density is part of the plan, as well as providing off-street parking and other uses such as retail, restaurants and community facilities.
Looking at The Boulevard specifically, the report noted that the City of Palmerston owns land within the City Centre, particularly along this street. This area was flagged as an ‘inactive/dysfunctional’ street.
Demand for office space, higher residential areas and retail use was noted to be strong, with the potential for some rezoning to allow for the masterplan, particularly looking to mixed-use developments, with each to provide a car parking solution on site.
It also noted that “Green roofs could become part of Palmerston’s City Centre new expression.”
In the first five years of the plan, the Council noted its focus would be to develop land on The Boulevard, to realign it to be a “civic way” and for the NT Government to commission development on its centrally located land.
“Incorporating a greater diversity of housing types, including mixed use developments in the City Centre, medium density residences along the urban fringes, housing developments above retail ground floor uses and affordable housing opportunities in new surrounding developments,” was noted as the theme of the plan.
Map courtesy of Google.
</body></html>

Northern Territory

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Northern Territory

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News