Lonsdale Street

<html><body>
<p>Wind back to mid last year and it was announced that The Uniting Church would team with Leighton Properties to deliver a new premium office tower opposite Wesley Church on Lonsdale Street, while also hoping to restore the church's place and identity in the heart of Melbourne. Referred to as the Wesley Upper Lonsdale Street site, a planning application for a premium office tower was submitted during January 2015, and is still under assessment.</p>

<blockquote>
<p>The Request for Proposal document made clear to prospective project partners that any development on the site needed to place a high emphasis on building relationships between people and to foster community relationships. It also outlined the need to restore and, where possible, enhance, the historic buildings while respecting the original custodians.</p>
<cite>Crosslight, Uniting Church</cite>
</blockquote>

<p>To that end Cox Architecture were engaged to create a development capable of fulfilling the above requirement, while also delivering a high-end office tower encompassing 55,000sqm of premium space.</p>

<h2>118-148 Lonsdale Street application highlights</h2>

<ul>
<li>Site area: 7,400sqm</li>
	<li>Stables, onsite factory and the Princess Mary Club to be demolished; other structures retained</li>
	<li>33 level commercial tower at 144.55 to its highest point</li>
	<li>55,000sqm of premium commercial space included</li>
	<li>Concave floor plates ranging between 1,700sqm and 2,100sqm</li>
	<li>End of trip facilities for 367 bicycle spaces included</li>
	<li>Level 3-4 car park accommodating 127 vehicles</li>
	<li>1,400sqm of retail and food/beverage space over nine ground floor tenancies</li>
	<li>Series of public realm spaces created around Wesley Place</li>
</ul>
<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image220_0.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Artist's impression of the new commercial building. Image courtesy Cox Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="1081" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image220_0.jpg?itok=ZlpsQCkY" title="Artist's impression of the new commercial building. Image courtesy Cox Architecture" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Artist's impression of the new commercial building. Image courtesy Cox Architecture</figcaption></figure><h2>The challenge at hand</h2>

<blockquote>
<p>While the heritage buildings appear to retain their overall integrity from a distance (with the exception of the very dilapidated Princess Mary Club) the situation is one of buildings much in need of maintenance. The site also provides a low level of amenity due to the car parking operations – the present-day setting for the Church is within a poorly arranged at-grade car park. This is inconsistent with the cultural heritage importance of the place.</p>

<p>A key challenge for the site is that the current buildings, and their condition, do not allow for a viable ongoing use of the site. Whilst a number of the current buildings are being used by the Wesley Church, it is far from optimum and would not be able to continue long term. Also the current use cannot fund the prohibitively expensive repair and restoration work required for the existing buildings on site.</p>

<p>Two of the buildings on site have been identified as reaching the point where they cannot be occupied for safety reasons, being the Princess Mary Club and Wesley House.</p>

<p>The nature and condition of the current buildings, and the impact of the existing car park use on the site constrain the activities of the Wesley Church, and have resulted in the Wesley Mission having to move off site.</p>
<cite>118-148 Lonsdale Street planning report</cite>
</blockquote>

<h2>Wesley Place: new urban realm</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image219.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Wesley Park. Image courtesy Cox Architecture"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="465" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image219.jpg?itok=hjA_zH71" title="Wesley Park. Image courtesy Cox Architecture" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Wesley Park. Image courtesy Cox Architecture</figcaption></figure><p>In line with The Uniting Church's wishes as outlined above, ground level activation plays a pronounced role in the redevelopment, in that the original structures and uses are to be melded with new facilities in order to increase public utilisation of the site.</p>

<p>In this regard the AECOM acting as landscape consultant have created three separate areas within the grounds which carry differing characteristics:</p>

<ul>
<li>The event and meeting place, addressing Lonsdale Street and forms the setting for the Church</li>
	<li>The Sanctuaries at either site of the Church building</li>
	<li>The city meeting place and retail food courtyard, featuring the cloister yard olive tree.</li>
</ul>
<p>The 'event and meeting place' will see the bulk of foot traffic access the site while the central 'sanctuary' will act as a subdued area either side of Wesley Church. The northern section of the site will be dedicated toward the 'city meeting place' with existing structures adapted into cafes with outdoor seating.</p>

<p>Running north south, Wesley Place will provide a link between Lonsdale and Little Lonsdale with 2,262sqm of the site dedicated to open space. Included in this figure is the 190sqm Wesley Park, 920sqm Northern Plaza and 770sqm Southern Church Forecourt area.</p>

<h2>Closer than ever?</h2>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image221.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Previous incarnations. Images courtesy studio505 and Leighton"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="247" src="/sites/urban.melbourne/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image221.jpg?itok=AthH-xNq" title="Previous incarnations. Images courtesy studio505 and Leighton" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Previous incarnations. Images courtesy studio505 and Leighton</figcaption></figure><p>The Wesley Church site has over previous decades been subject to differing development schemes, with a number of towers put forward with no great success.</p>

<p>One such scheme was conceived by studio505 who along with project partner Grocon submitted plans for a similarly sized office complex to that of the current design. Under the title ‘Wesley Village’, the development would have also seen the delivery of a new urban space separating new and old structures while also creating "Truly magnificent, sophisticated and elegant architecture that inspires."</p>

<p>While the studio505 design would have brought a visual focal point to Lonsdale Street via its streaky podium, the current Cox Architecture design has taken an opposing path by paring back its initial offering. In perhaps a more respectful nod to the existing church, gone is the diagonal white bracing and crumpled podium features, replaced by more subdued finishes.</p>

<p>With the swirl of speculation surrounding the <a href="http://www.afr.com/real-estate/relaunched-leighton-properties-sale-pays-dividends-20150318-1m1osl">sale of Leighton Properties</a> in recent months, it remains to be seen if and when the tie-up between Leighton Properties and The Uniting Church will lead to the delivery of this long sought after development.</p>

<h2>118-148 Lonsdale Street planning team</h2>

<ul>
<li>Developer: Leighton Properties</li>
	<li>Architect &amp; Urban Context: Cox Architecture</li>
	<li>Planning: Urbis</li>
	<li>Heritage Consultant: Lovell Chen</li>
	<li>Landscape, ESD &amp; Public Realm: AECOM</li>
	<li>​Traffic Engineer: Traffix Group</li>
	<li>Wind Assessment: Mel Consultants</li>
	<li>Waste: Leigh Design</li>
	<li>Quantity Surveyor: RLB</li>
	<li>Building Surveyor: Gardiner Group</li>
</ul>
</body></html>

silvermb

Wesley Place seeks to bring new life to Lonsdale Street

<html><body>
<blockquote>
<p>We get really obsessed with height - we can have great towers and bad towers, we need to shift the discussion more toward the quality of development.</p>
<cite>Leanne Hodyl, <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/news/public-forum-city-in-crisis">IMPA's 'City in Crisis?' forum</a></cite>
</blockquote>

<p>This interesting quote appeared in <a href="https://www.urban.com.au/expert-insights/buying/25000sqm-threshold-yes-it-is-time-to-review-it">Alastair's article</a> on Monday, which delved into who should maintain planning authority over Melbourne. The notion of shifting focus more toward quality of development rather than height is a noble one, but it's simply not that straight forward.</p>

<p>A counter argument could be found in comments made during the recent Meinhardt tall towers seminar in which Meinhardt's Jon Brock essentially stated that people don't really care how tall a tower is beyond a certain point, tall is tall but what matters most is what occurs at street level. A vibrant, user friendly, interesting and varied street frontage is in fact the key to a development's quality.</p>

<p>A prime example of this has surfaced with PDS Group recently releasing a handful of high resolution images for 380 Lonsdale Street for which they will act as Project Manager and Superintendent.</p>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/229.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Artist's perspective from Lonsdale Street. Image courtesy PDS Group"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="909" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/229.jpg?itok=hCsmuD6b" title="Artist's perspective from Lonsdale Street. Image courtesy PDS Group" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Artist's perspective from Lonsdale Street. Image courtesy PDS Group</figcaption></figure><p>So which is it? Height or quality? 380 Lonsdale Street proves in its most recent version you can have both. The Elenberg Fraser-designed tower may well stand at 217 metres when realised which is approximately 55 metres higher than the initial Spowers design.</p>

<p>Below is a comparison between the two designs highlighting the all-important ground level which shows the current Elenberg Fraser design to hold a higher level of interest, activity and greenery. Active glass frontages and green planters seek to replace uniform composite panels; both shroud above ground car parking yet one does so in a more aesthetically pleasing fashion.</p>

<p>There's no intended slight against Spowers, their version after all gained approval via the State Government, but there's little doubt that Elenberg Fraser's provides a heightened quality to the public domain.</p>

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/image4380.jpg" rel="gallery-all" title="Images courtesy PDS Group and spowers"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="590" src="/sites/urbanmelbourne.info/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/image4380.jpg?itok=HdyQcqKp" title="Images courtesy PDS Group and spowers" width="580"></a>

<figcaption>Images courtesy PDS Group and Spowers</figcaption></figure><p>380 Lonsdale Street in its current form goes to show that the questions of height and quality aren't bound together in an inverse relationship. They are separate issues and should be treated as such.</p>

<p>Railing against buildings purely for their height serves no purpose to my way of thinking. Asking for alterations and/or rejecting planning applications based more so upon what they deliver or fail to deliver to the streetscape, or indeed what they replace is of more relevance than any question over height.</p>
</body></html>

Lonsdale Street

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Lonsdale Street

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News