Development applications

Property development groups, including Lendlease and Stockland, have shared their support of the City of Sydney&rsquo;s plan to include energy targets in development applications.&nbsp;

In a first for a local council in Australia, the proposal means development applications for new office buildings, hotels and shopping centres and major redevelopments of existing buildings will comply with minimum energy ratings.

Neil Arckless, Lendlease executive development director, said his organisation supported the ambitious performance standards.&nbsp;

New buildings will be more energy efficient, use more renewable energy and support the transition to net-zero emissions.

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7588 project_image_fid=72298]

The regulations will come into effect in January 2023 and achieve net-zero energy output by 2026.

The measures are expected to save more than $1.3 billion on energy bills for investors, businesses and occupants from 2023 to 2040, and help the City meet its target of net-zero emissions by 2035.&nbsp;

&ldquo;At Lendlease we recently set our own pathway to net zero carbon by 2025 and absolute zero by 2040&rdquo;, Arckless said.

&ldquo;We are always pushing the boundaries to innovate in&nbsp;sustainability&nbsp;and welcome the City of Sydney leading the way in the development of these performance standards. I&rsquo;m confident we can all rise to the challenge.&rdquo;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=7758 project_image_fid=79424]

The City of Sydney&rsquo;s ambitious, yet achievable, standards were created with support from developers, industry bodies, consultants and government agencies.&nbsp;

<blockquote>
&ldquo;As we emerge from the impacts of the pandemic, we&rsquo;re helping ensure sustainability&nbsp;and resilience is at the core of business recovery&rdquo;, said the Lord Mayor.
</blockquote>

&ldquo;The performance standards and evidence base can be used by all councils across Greater Sydney and will support investment in renewable energy and create jobs in regional areas &ndash; as we have already done through our investment in wind farms and solar farms in Inverell, Nowra and Wagga Wagga.&nbsp;

&ldquo;The climate challenge is one that we can only meet with concerted action. The more we can work together and exchange information, knowledge and experiences, the greater our ability to meet the NSW Government net-zero emissions target and allow us to continue to create truly liveable cities&quot;, the Lord Mayor said.&nbsp;

[smartcode_project:default project_id=13326]

Stockland CEO commercial property Louise Mason said the company strongly endorsed the City&rsquo;s net-zero energy buildings performance standards.&nbsp;

&ldquo;We have brought forward our target to achieve net zero carbon emissions to 2028 and extended the commitment across our entire portfolio, covering close to 170 active assets and projects Australia-wide,&rdquo; Mason said.&nbsp;

The measures are expected to deliver substantial financial benefits. Annually office owners will save $2,750 per 1,000 square metres of floor area and hotel owners $170 per hotel room.&nbsp;

There are also additional public benefits and savings in health, energy network and emissions costs, worth around $1.8 billion.

&ldquo;Across Greater Sydney, the changing climate is a shared problem. These performance standards will help us meet our shared goal of net zero emissions and deliver progress against the Greater Sydney region plan low carbon city objective,&rdquo; Greater Sydney Commission environment commissioner Emma Herd said.

Property development groups, including Lendlease and Stockland, have shared their support of the City of Sydney’s plan to include energy targets in development applications

max.kwok_55688

Developers support the City of Sydney’s ambitious new plans for net zero buildings 

<html><body>
A prime development site in Sydney's Elizabeth Bay has finally got the green light to construct a luxury apartment development.

The integrated property group Top Spring Australia submitted $21 million plans to the City of Sydney earlier this year to develop the 1,345 sqm site at 11-13 Greenknowe Avenue which is owned by the Chinese-backed Australia developer SHMH Group.

SHMH paid $20.24 million for the development site in 2014, but over the years had been struggling to get an eight level building approved due to height restrictions.

They then had a 52 room boarding house approved, with conditions, but steps to expedite the deferred commencement with the council were not successful.

The new plans will see the former HQ of the NSW Country Women's Association demolished and the site excavated, before the construction of a part six, part seven storey residential building made up of 30 two and three bedroom apartments.

There will be one level of basement parking. 

<img alt="" height="1095" src="https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/11-13_greenknowe_avenue_elizabeth_bay_2.jpg" width="2000">

It will be only for owner-occupiers, or those on long-term residential leases, and not for short-term accomodation.

PBD Architects have designed the building which will recognise the heritage character of the surrounding area, with a brick façade and art deco features.

Top Spring also recently appointed award-winning Melbourne-based designer, Miriam Fanning, of MIM Design.

Taylor Brammer Landscape Architects have also been commissioned for the project.

Sydney Ma, Director and General Manager of Top Spring Australia, says Greenknowe Avenue will also demonstrate the company’s ambition to incorporate the character of the local area into each of their projects.

“Elizabeth Bay is well-known for its stunning architecture, so with our Greenknowe Avenue project, we are committed to delivering an exemplary level of quality and design, while respecting and honouring the distinctive architectural character of the local surroundings,” explained Mr Ma.

“In this context, it will be of utmost importance for us to deliver an outstanding building design that complements Elizabeth Bay, and it’s pleasing to know the City of Sydney approves of our vision.”

SHMH had been using the building as offices as they struggled to get their eight level building approved.

SHMH tried to sell the building, listing it last September hoping it would sell for around $30 million.

PBD's latest development to the City of Sydney saw them request to convert a portion of the ground floor of the existing building as a display suite, which suggests the development will be called Watanabe.

Sales are expected to commence in April 2021, with completion slated for 2023.
</body></html>

Joel Robinson

Elizabeth Bay apartment development gets green light

<html><body>
<h2>OPINION: </h2>

Some say that patience is a virtue, but a lot must be said about “hustling while you wait” and more aptly, that “time is money”. Indeed, time remains one of the most significant parameters of business. It is arguably a more important factor in project delivery, construction, finance, and management, than even the quantum of profit, or administration, or procurement practices. And we have totally lost sight of this all-significant factor in the NSW Planning System today.

We heard through the official channels as late as last week that assessment times for Development Applications (DAs) have reduced by 50%, following the introduction of the new online lodgement system. This ostensibly appears to be a greater victory than that of Alexander the Great over Darius III in 331 BC.  But for those of us who are currently toiling away, shackled and enslaved with the labyrinthine NSW Planning System, we cannot see or feel in a single Development Application that this may be remotely true. But we have stopped complaining because what we thought was slow ten years ago, is now considered “lightning fast”. 

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/screen_shot_2020-03-04_at_10.57.01_am.png" rel="gallery-all"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="385" src="/s3/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/screen_shot_2020-03-04_at_10.57.01_am.png?itok=NKFdi6x5" width="580"></a></figure>One still wonders if the current information on halving DA times is truth or aspiration when it is so unrepresentative of the overwhelming experience of the NSW property industry. The pervasive pattern thus far has been to introduce more rules and regulations that are designed to help us do better and go faster. Except we do worse and go slower. And though we have been conditioned to heed the touted fears of an “unregulated” world, having a DA for a complying project take 24 months and a rezoning stretch to 5 years, cannot be in anyone’s best interest – unless I am mistaken.

That has to be, by anyone’s standard, “snail’s pace”. Now when you consider that the average garden snail, crawls along at around 0.05 km/h, and assuming it travels for 16 hours per day, the snail could within 24 months, travel around 584 km. That is the equivalent of crawling from the Sydney Opera House, to Parliament House in Canberra, and back before the average building DA is approved.

<figure><a class="colorbox colorbox-insert-image" href="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/www.urban.com.au/s3fs-public/pictures/article-images/screen_shot_2020-03-04_at_10.57.15_am.png" rel="gallery-all"><img alt="" class="image-article-full-width-580px" height="385" src="/s3/files/styles/article_full_width_580px/public/pictures/article-images/screen_shot_2020-03-04_at_10.57.15_am.png?itok=JTqnqczU" width="580"></a></figure>While so wanting to go faster, is undoubtedly everyone’s aspiration, including state and local government, in scrutinising the lived-experience and reflecting upon the stark reality that in NSW Planning today, this is more a “piped dream” that a “deliverable”  in today’s commercial world. And this has always been a problem confined to the development industry – until you have to lodge a simple DA for your pergola or driveway, and begin to experience the expense and entanglement of your simple application travelling at “snail’s pace” through the NSW Planning System.

And nobody wins. The council or the state uses up a lot of time and resource to get to the same result, and the consumer suffers financially crippling delays that render applicants so anguished, they almost abandon their applications after years of trying and tens of thousands of dollars of real expense. 

So I can’t see how allowing one’s application to go online has already halved the approval times of DAs. It sounds difficult to believe if you understand the complexity of the preparation of a DA and its pathway to assessment. But after 21 years of being immersed in this ocean of complexity - I am ready to try anything: voodoo; a monastic experience; even e-planning.

Perhaps it is better to go back to basics. The sagacious Justice Sutherland once reminded applicants:

<blockquote>
“Salus Populi Suprema Lex Est” - that “the welfare of the people is the supreme law”. 
</blockquote>

And I say that the “welfare of the people” today needs to be better than what we have now: the “snail’s pace” that is the NSW Approval Process. Here’s to hoping.
</body></html>

Development applications

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News

Development applications

Editor's Picks

Receive the latest news stories to your inbox

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News