Do think about impacts of direct property on your fund's diversification

Michael LaurenceDecember 17, 2020

Superannuation law does not prohibit a fund from owning just one asset such as a valuable investment property.

Indeed, some fund trustees specifically decide to have SMSF portfolios dominated by a single property asset, perhaps after considering the diversification of their other super and non-super investments.

SMSFs are required to have written investment strategies.

And when preparing their strategies, trustees must consider such factors as investment risk, portfolio diversification, liquidity of investments, ability to pay member benefits and the members’ circumstances.

Despite the requirement that fund trustee smust consider diversification when preparing an investment strategy, they are not legally required to diversify.

Financial planners and superannuation specialists typically urge fund trustees to recognise the possible consequences if their retirement savings are overly dependent on the profitability of a single, high-cost asset.


This article is part of Property Observer'free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors.

Editor's Picks

Builder appointed, ANZ funded: Inside Fernhurst, Kew's newest residences
Lendlease creating world-class resident experiences at Collins Wharf
Hirsch & Faigen plots fourth Gold Coast apartment development, Marbella Broadbeach
First look: Immerse Projects plan new apartments at Kirra Beach
City Beat March 2025: Olympics announcement to drive further growth in Brisbane property market