Do think about impacts of direct property on your fund's diversification

Michael LaurenceDecember 17, 2020

Superannuation law does not prohibit a fund from owning just one asset such as a valuable investment property.

Indeed, some fund trustees specifically decide to have SMSF portfolios dominated by a single property asset, perhaps after considering the diversification of their other super and non-super investments.

SMSFs are required to have written investment strategies.

And when preparing their strategies, trustees must consider such factors as investment risk, portfolio diversification, liquidity of investments, ability to pay member benefits and the members’ circumstances.

Despite the requirement that fund trustee smust consider diversification when preparing an investment strategy, they are not legally required to diversify.

Financial planners and superannuation specialists typically urge fund trustees to recognise the possible consequences if their retirement savings are overly dependent on the profitability of a single, high-cost asset.


This article is part of Property Observer'free eBook: 21 do’s and don’ts for SMSF property investors.

Editor's Picks

Capri prepares to welcome residents to resort-style villa community on Isle of Capri
Buyers take advantage of WA stamp duty concessions as Incontro Subiaco apartments near 50% sold
Gold Coast buyers starting to think longer-term: Five minutes with SRQ Projects Director Nick Clydsdale
A "passion project" not to be repeated: Inside DJ Fisher's Pescado Palm Beach with Jayde Pezet
Why Danby Lane in Nundah is more than just a project for Gardner Vaughan Group: Five minutes with Sam Gardner