Luxury home market getting slammed, as predicted
In late 2009 Rismark repeatedly forecast that the double-digit house price growth registered over that year would fall back to single-digit levels in 2010 in line with expected disposable household income growth of 3% to 5% (see here for the records). As it turned out, house prices rose by about 5% last year.
In September 2010, a couple of months before the RBA’s de facto double rate hike, I commented, “Since 1993 there have been five instances when the RBA has lifted the cash rate sharply. On every single occasion national capital city dwelling prices have flat-lined or declined. If the RBA aggressively raises rates, there is no reason to expect 2010-11 to be any different.”
Two months later, I further warned that, “Our central case is that there will be little to no nominal dwelling price growth over 2011, with a chance of small nominal declines.”
In the first two charts below, I have illustrated how Rismark’s “out-of-sample” (i.e., blind) forecasts for Australia’s two biggest cities have stacked up against actual house price movements over the last few years.
RP Data-Rismark’s April index results very much confirm our 2010 projections. In short, the RBA’s “double-tap” in November has started to bite, with the luxury end of the market leading the way.
Raw house prices have retracted by 0.7% over the first four months of 2010. To put that in perspective, that’s similar to the daily movements one sees in the Australian sharemarket index.
In seasonally adjusted terms, which allows one to strip out the periodic, intra-year seasonal shifts in house prices, dwelling values are down a far more noticeable 2.5%.
The difference between these two results reflects the fact that the housing market normally realises above-trend growth at the start of each year.
As I have explained here, the RBA explicitly asked us to report seasonally adjusted index results in addition to the raw numbers, which is what economists and statisticians also prefer.
There are two interesting insights to be drawn from RP Data-Rismark’s latest release. First, the rather unexciting overall market conditions conceal some more striking cross-sectional dynamics. The chart below shows the movements in home values over the 12 months to end April.
Observe the circa 7% corrections in the value of housing in Perth and Brisbane, which contrasts with the rest of the nation, where house prices range from being up 1.2% to down 2.9%. This is consistent with the ramp-up in repossessions that the RBA has documented in Queensland and Western Australia since the GFC, although repos seem to be declining again (see here for the RBA's repo data).
Notwithstanding the absence of capital gains, rents have been growing relatively quickly, with apartments now yielding 4.9% gross. We saw that in the first quarter of 2011 the ABS also reported that rents rose by 1.3%, significantly outpacing core inflation.
The second finding of interest is the rapid deceleration in the luxury home segment.
Following a request by the RBA, RP Data and Rismark divided our capital city house price index into three sub-indices: the bottom 20% of suburbs ranked by price, the middle 60%, and the top 20%.
Over the year to end April, dwellings in the most expensive capital city suburbs recorded a 5.4% loss (see next chart). In contrast, home values in the middle 60% of suburbs were down by only 0.9%. Dwellings located in the cheapest 20% of suburbs were the best performers (down just 0.5%).
The uber-luxury segment is risky and highly illiquid, and has had the rug whipped from under it via a combination of the soaring Aussie dollar and the enormous destruction of wealth in Australia’s volatile sharemarket.
A final fly in the ointment is the much lower growth – and pay packets – expected in the financial services industry. Luxury homes in areas like Sydney’s eastern suburbs will continue to face valuation headwinds as banks deal with the new normal of subdued credit growth.
