<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
I believe the answer to improving affordability lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first home buyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
MARK ARMSTRONG is a director of <a href="https://ratemyagent.com.au/" target="_blank">ratemyagent.com.au</a>, Australia’s number one real estate agent rating website.
This article was originally published on Property Observer in October 2013.
</body></html>

marmstrong-sd3emVLPPb

Allowing first home buyers access to super is the answer to the affordability dilemma

<html><body>
When Australia’s biggest underwriter of lenders mortgage insurance rules a line through an entire asset class of property then investors should take note.  
Recently Genworth announced that from December 19, 2013 they would no longer accept off-the-plan or new properties as security when purchased in self-managed super funds. The announcement reads:
“Off-the-plan purchases and new properties that have been completed for less than 12 months are no longer acceptable. A “new property” is defined as being any property (including any house, unit, villa or townhouse) that has been fully completed for less than 12 months and/or has not been previously sold since construction (i.e. the vendor is a developer/builder or a related party of the developer/builder).”
Genworths’ role in the finance world is to ensure a bank does not lose any money if a borrower cannot meet their loan repayments. If the bank is forced to sell the property and is still left short the mortgage insurer fills the gap.  
Lenders mortgage insurers are very conservative by nature and they are sending a clear signal that they do not see a positive capital growth outlook for these types of properties.  
Genworth is looking to protect its own bottom line and are ruling out allowing their SMSF clients to invest in properties they think are risky investments. While the main reason for this is self-preservation it does provide a level of protection for these investors.  
At the same time that Genworth is waving a red warning flag to wealthy SMSF investors the government is still encouraging first homebuyers to buy this exact kind of property.  
Our government knows how important the building industry is to our economy so they are making it appealing for first homebuyers to invest in new properties only.  
For example a payment of up to $10,000 is available for eligible first home owners in Victoria for contracts entered into on or after July 1, 2013 to build or purchase a new home valued at up to $750,000.  In NSW the grant is currently $15,000 for first home buyers who build or buy new property.  
The government is leading first home buyers to focus on one particular type of property. Again the focus is to underpin the building industry but the byproduct is many first home buyers are in danger of being placed in a dangerous position.  
This is because new properties tend to have a low land to asset ratio meaning most of the value is tied up in the building not the land. It is land that appreciates in value and buildings depreciate. The result is capital growth that is more likely to fall behind the rest of the market. In addition new homes and apartments tend to be clustered together and can often be located in areas where there is an over supply of similar property.  
The current first home buyer policy solves a short-term problem by creating jobs in the building sector. However in the long run it is likely to place young first home buyers under financial pressure. The policy fails to acknowledge the dynamics of the property market and lures them into buying properties that well educated investors are avoiding.    
 
<hr>
 Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
 
 
 
</body></html>

The first home buyer policy is luring people into properties investors know to avoid

<html><body>
First home buyers are fighting with a 100 pound gorilla with one arm tied behind their backs as they compete with investors who have the luxury of negative gearing and superannuation funds.
But laws around negative gearing and super are unlikely to change so it’s time to revisit the issue.
I believe the answer lies in rethinking superannuation laws and first home buyer grants.
Historically the family home has been the corner stone of ones wealth but this is in danger of being lost. Superannuation was implemented to help people self fund their own retirement and compliment the wealth in their family homes. I believe that allowing first home buyers to access their super and assist them in laying that foundation keeps within the spirit of superannuation.
 A worker who earns the average Australian income of $50,000 a year will have around $36,000 in super by the time they are 30 not including any return on their investments. As a couple that is $72,000! They also have the benefit of diverting more of their income into a tax-sheltered environment. It would not be unreasonable for a first home buying couple to have in excess of $100,000 in super by the time they want to purchase their first home.
<blockquote>
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite.
</blockquote>
A large deposit like this would mean first home buyers have more equity in their home and as a result in a more stable financial position. It would also save a significant amount in interest. For example if a first homebuyer had a $100,000 deposit they would only need to borrow around 80% of the property value rather than 90% or more. On a $500,000 home that would save them $2,500 to $3,000 per annum in interest.
They would also avoid paying a hefty mortgage insurance bill of around $5,000 to $10,000 in most cases.
Buying a property is only the first step to home ownership. Keeping up with the mortgage payments is where the real pain starts to bite. If governments really want to help with home ownership they should look at providing ongoing assistance and review first home buyer grants.
First home buyer grants have evolved over the years but on average they provide first home buyers with around $10,000 cash or stamp duty saving benefits. Rather than paying first home buyers a lump sum payment that is usually paid to the banks for mortgage insurance, I believe annual payments will be more effective and a better use of taxpayer money. An annual payment of $2,000 a year for the first five years would help first home buyers establish themselves in the market.
While the devil is in the detail the points outlined above provide a win-win outcome. The government wins as it helps solve first home buyer affordability at no extra cost. The economy wins, as more money will flow into the important building industry. First home buyers win as they will enter the market without paying mortgage insurance and save around $5,000 per annum in holding costs for the first five years.
There is a potential downside in that it would place further pressure on property prices. However this is already happening even without first home buyers and these ideas will go a long way to levelling the playing field between first home buyers and investors.
They would help young Australians into the market and start the process of building wealth in one of our most powerful tax-free investments – our home.
Mark Armstrong is a director of <a href="https://www.ipropertyplan.com.au/">iProperty Plan</a>, which provides independent analysis and tailored advice to investors and home buyers.
This article was first published on Property Observer in October, 2013.
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE TO READ:
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=4lSOU9OGBoLh8AWz04LoBw&amp;ved=0CAoQFjAC&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNEsLTG_yhrdXMWc6K0tUs4ExH4zkg" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31501-exclusive-first-home-buyer-picks-from-the-experts.html">Exclusive: First home buyer picks from the experts</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/forward-planning/investment-strategy/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=4lSOU9OGBoLh8AWz04LoBw&amp;ved=0CBYQFjAI&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNGpdo7JW0MfB1BezFddwp63td8zaA" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/forward-planning/investment-strategy/65-first-home-buyers/31872-how-will-rising-student-debt-affect-first-home-buyers.html">How will rising student debt affect first home buyers?</a>
<a href="/expert-insights/buying/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants" target="_blank" data-cturl="https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants.html&amp;sa=U&amp;ei=B1WOU4udC5Pf8AXF_YDYDg&amp;ved=0CAYQFjAA&amp;client=internal-uds-cse&amp;usg=AFQjCNFHQorVTsJrTVRgPVX0IFEiP5Ph8w" data-ctorig="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/finding/residential-investment/1st-home-buyer/31603-the-national-guide-to-first-home-buyer-grants.html">The national guide to first home buyer grants</a>
</body></html>

It's time to re-think first home buyer grants

<html><body>
Although the clearance rate in Melbourne this week was a reasonably healthy 60% the buyers clearly had the upper hand as their compatriots were thin on the ground. Many auctions were passed in and negotiated shortly after.
For those who want to have a harmless punt, there's now a tipping website, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/">www.propertytycoon.com.au</a>, where punters can guess auction five results in Melbourne and Sydney, with no outlay. It's mostly about testing your market knowledge with a small cash prize as a sweetener. 
When a property is passed in the balance of power immediately moves to the buyer, as was the case at 19 Lee Street, Flemington (pictured below). After a brief auction, where only one bidder appeared, the property was passed in for $800,000.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/07/leest.jpg">
For the buyer this was gold, as it gave him the opportunity to stand firm and drag out the negotiation. After extensive discussions lasting a couple of hours the property sold for $820,000. This price was $10,000 less than the top of the agent’s quoted range.
In Sydney auctions clearance rates were just behind Melbourne at 58.8%, but interestingly 28 or around 15% of the scheduled auctions were withdrawn. This indicates a significant number of properties had no interested parties, as a property is usually withdrawn if no one registers their intention to bid.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/07/birriga.jpg">
Four out of the five Sydney Property Tycoon auctions were sold. The top floor Art Deco apartment at 10/78 Birriga Road, Bellevue Hill (pictured above), sold under the hammer for $675,000. This result is what the majority of auction tippers expected, with the average tip being $670,000.
</body></html>

Balance of power held by buyers as Melbourne and Sydney auction tipping competition properties sell at or after auction

<html><body>
It is land that drives property values, and a  Kensington, Sydney property going to auction this weekend is the kind of land many buyers are looking for.
For those who want to have a harmless punt, there's now a tipping website, <a style="font-size: 14px; text-align: left;" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/">www.propertytycoon.com.au</a>, where punters can guess auction five results in Melbourne and Sydney, with no outlay. It's mostly about testing your market knowledge with a small cash prize as a sweetener. 
One of the five Sydney properties going to auction this weekend in round six of the competition is <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-kensington-110887663" target="_blank">10 Koorinda Avenue, Kensington</a>, which has 600 square metres of north-facing rear land within about five kilometres of Sydney. That should prick of the ears of astute home buyers looking to make a sound investment play into the market.
The three-bedroom solid brick Edwardian, in fair but liveable condition, has three bedrooms and one bathroom. The bones are all there, it just needs a touch of imagination to see what this property could become.
Nelson Dueza from Century 21 Randwick will auction the property and has buyer interest around $1.4 million.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/07/koorinda.jpg">
If you think you know what it will sell for place a tip at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/" rel="nofollow">Property Tycoon</a>.
</body></html>

Sydney auction tipping

<html><body>
There is expected to be first-home buyer and investor interest for a one-bedroom Carlton North property this weekend.
For those who want to have a harmless punt, there's now a tipping website, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/">www.propertytycoon.com.au</a>, where punters can guess auction five results in Melbourne and Sydney, with no outlay. It's mostly about testing your market knowledge with a small cash prize as a sweetener. 
One of the properties going to auction this week in round six of the competition is <a href="https://www.realestate.com.au/property-apartment-vic-carlton+north-110871279" target="_blank">3/20-28 Earl Street, Carlton North</a>, is not a big property but it should be highly sought after on Saturday. Good one-bedroom apartments provide an affordable entry point for first home-buyers and investors. They tend to have a consistent level of demand regardless of the wider market conditions.
While this kind of property is easier to find in the inner east of Melbourne, it is rare to find a good one-bedroom apartment in the inner north. According to the Valuer-General’s statistics, an apartment only becomes available is this block every three to four years.
The unit was last sold in 2006 for $275,000, and agent Jason Sharpe from Woodards is quoting $360,000 to $390,000.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/07/carltontycoon.jpg">
If you think you know what it will sell for place a tip at <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/" rel="nofollow">Property Tycoon</a>.
</body></html>

Melbourne auction tipping

<html><body>
A four-bedroom home in Curl Curl that has been thoroughly renovated will test the beachside market this weekend.
For those who want to have a harmless punt, there's now a tipping website, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/" rel="nofollow" style="font-size: 14px;">www.propertytycoon.com.au</a>, where punters can guess auction five results in Melbourne and Sydney, with no outlay. It's mostly about testing your market knowledge with a small cash prize as a sweetener.
<img src="/images/stories/2012/08/curlcurl.jpg">
Mike Dunn from McGrath Real Estate will looking for bidding in excess of $1.6 million when he auctions 8 Stirgess Avenue, Curl Curl, one of five Sydney properties going to auction this week in round 10 of the competition. The two-storey, four-bedroom and three-bathroom family home has been renovated from head to toe since it was purchased for $835,000 in 2002.
It’s a contemporary beachside haven, and the new owners’ hardest decision will be to decide between lazing by the pool or wandering down to the beach to catch a few waves.
If you think you know what it will sell for place a tip at <a rel="nofollow" href="https://www.propertytycoon.com.au/" target="_blank">Property Tycoon</a>.
</body></html>

Mark Armstrong

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News