<html><body>
The Gold Coast property market presents a myriad opportunities for those seeking an investment under $300,000, according to Herron Todd White’s September month in review report.

According to HTW’s Gold Coast valuation team, about 20% of properties currently being sold on the Gold Coast are priced under $300,000, but there is not much for that price on the more expensive Sunshine Coast.

“Provided buyers are not greedy in their house wants or are able to live comfortably in a unit, there is a myriad of options available for purchasers wishing to spend under $300,000,” says HTW’s Gold Coast office.

Looking at the unit market, HTW says there are plenty of sub-$300,000 options in Surfers Paradise, including older-style units starting in the low $100,000s and one-bedroom, one-bathroom units in modern high rises from $250,000 to $320,000.

A recent sale in this price range was a 7th floor one-bedroom apartment plus study with two bathrooms in Wings Residential on the Gold Coast Highway,  built around 2004, which sold on June 28, 2012, for $250,000.

Another one-bedroom unit at Wings (pictured below) on the fourth floor that measures 90 square metres is currently listed for sale by Raine &amp; Horne Surfers Paradise John Monteith, “very keenly priced” at $309,000.

<img src="/images/stories/2012/09/wings.jpg">

Other recent sales around the $300,000 mark include Unit 43 in Diamond Beach South in Mermaid Beach, a two-bedroom semi-modern unit in a three-storey walk-up, and a 1994 two-bedroom low-rise unit measuring 105 square metres.

The report suggests that sections of the Gold Coast apartment market are still very much a basket case, with HTW valuers highlighting Southport CBD medium-/high-rise developments, which have recorded severe drops in value over the past couple of years due to distressed sales and rising body corporate rates.

“While values are still slowly softening, the rental market has remained relatively stable."

According to HTW, a notable sale at the $300,000 price point was 715/2 Aqua Street, Southport – a 2009, two-bedroom medium-rise unit with single car basement car space measuring 84 square metres within the Meriton development Brighton on Broadwater (pictured below).

<img src="/images/stories/2012/09/brightonbroadwater.jpg">

Originally sold by the developer for $350,000 in 2009, the apartment sold in July 2011 for $300,000 and most recently sold for $286,250 in April this year.

 

<hr class="system-pagebreak">
 

HTW notes that the best buys generally remain stressed sales, “which are still dominating the lower end of the valuation echelon".

“The market has continued to soften into 2012, with recent indications that the market is starting to stabilise.

“Properties in this price bracket represent the highest sales rates currently on the Gold Coast but many are in fringe rather than central locations. Generally speaking the properties selling circa $300,000 are untidy and usually in need of at least some cosmetic improvement (around $10,000 to $20,000 cost) to lift their overall presentation and marketability.”

In the case of the Sunshine Coast, HTW valuers say $300,000 does give buyers some good options, but options and “bang for your buck” increase if buyers are willing to increase your spending to the low $300,000s.

“Along the coast options are largely restricted to units.

“In the main tourist areas of Mooloolaba/Caloundra and in some cases Noosa, you can purchase two- bedroom units for between $250,000 and $300,000.

In January, Graham Smith from Richardson &amp; Wrench Noosa Heads sold a two-bedroom unit in South Pacific Resort, 179 Weyba Road (pictured below), for under $285,000 in a distressed sale.

<img src="/images/stories/2012/09/noosaville.jpg">

According to <a href="https://www.myrp.com.au/" target="_blank">RP Data</a>, the median unit price in Noosaville is $437,500.

For those looking to buy a house around this price range, HTW says spending in the low $300,000 would buy into areas like Battery Hill, Mount Coolum and possibly Tewantin.

Currently listed for sale is a three-bedroom house being sold by Caloundra City Realty with an asking price of $319,000.

<img src="/images/stories/2012/09/batteryhill.jpg">

“As you move into the hinterland there is defiantly more options. The main service centre of Nambour provides a range of services and employment, with both older and reasonably modern homes selling sub-$300,000,” says HTW.

 “As we move to the railway townships the options continue.

“The key with any purchase is to keep your eye on the market. There are some great buys out there with pressured vendors being forced to sell, often at well below replacement costs. Calling agents, going to auctions and seeking good independent advice are all relevant tips to ensure that you don’t miss an opportunity,” says HTW.

Buying opportunities for under $300,000 was the theme of the residential aspect of this month’s report following <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/high-yielding-investment-opportunities-for-under-%24500000-in-nsw-include-western-sydney-and-regional-areas-htw/2012060454984" target="_blank">Herron Todd White August report on how to spend a “lazy $500,000”.</a>

The switch to look at a more entry-level price barometer follows a “tastefully worded email” from a reader suggesting to HTW valuers that $500,000 was a bit too much to squander and they should “try and see things from a more reasonable perspective”.

<h2>Recently listed properties:</h2>

[smartcode_project:default project_id=93128]

[smartcode_project:default project_id=6769]

[smartcode_project:default project_id=24427]
</body></html>

lschlesinger-FZcF9M3vE6

Plenty to buy on the Gold Coast for under $300,000 but not much on the Sunshine Coast: Herron Todd White

<html><body>
ASIC is currently undertaking “limited surveillance” of financial advisers and accountants over concerns that property spruikers are encouraging investors to set up self-managed super funds purely as vehicles for "dodgy" property investments.
The corporate watchdog also has a taskforce focused on the aggressive marketing of speculative property investments, according to report in The Australian.
"We don't want SMSFs to be the preferred vehicle for dodgy property spruikers," says ASIC commissioner Peter Kell.
Kell says being encouraged to set up a SMSF “solely to invest in direct property” should be a “warning sign” for consumers.
He says a big risk for SMSF investors is speculating on property in areas where they are less familiar.
This would suggest ASIC concerns about investing in areas such as remote mining towns, where new housing developments have been heavily promoted by marketeers.
According to Kell, in some cases investors are being flown to places like the Gold Coast, shown a property and then steered through all the steps necessary to set up the SMSF, including creating the holding trust required to act as custodian of the property and arranging the loan and purchase of the property.
Current tax rules do allow investors to put investment property into their SMSF and also borrow against the fund to acquire property - provided it is done at arm’s length and with the appropriate structures.
But Kell says setting up a fund just to acquire and hold property is clearly in breach of the spirit of DIY funds by not achieving diversity and may also breach trustee obligations to maintain liquidity in the fund.
Investing in property through a SMSF holds significant tax advantages with the maximum rate of tax paid on rental income being 15% and falling to 0% if the SMSF is in the pension phase.
This compares with personally held property where rental income is taxed at a marginal tax rate, which in some cases can be as high as 46.5%.
“ASIC has concerns that people are being encouraged to set up SMSFs in situations where they don’t have the resources, experience and understanding to ensure they actually generate the expected benefits,” says Kell.
Kell says the resourcing issue is not just about money but having the time to properly manage your SMSF.
But he says ASIC is emphatically not anti-SMSF, but is worried that as the sector grows in popularity it will be a target for fraudsters.
ASIC hopes to release research into this aspect of SMSF investing in 2013.
</body></html>

 ASIC raises alarm bells about spruikers exploiting SMSF rules to push dodgy property investments 

<html><body>
The common perception of first-home buyers as 20-somethings may need to be reconsidered, with a new survey showing a declining trend in first-home buyers aged 29 and under and a rising proportion of buyers aged 40 and over.
A Mortgage Choice online survey of 1,000 Australians who plan to buy their first home in the next two years found that the greatest proportion of first-home buyers (41%) are aged between 30 and 39, compared with 39% aged 18 to 29.
The proportion of prospective first-home buyers aged 40 and over was 20%, or one in five.
These results build on earlier online polls that show a trend of first-home buyers choosing to purchase when they are older and a marked decline in younger buyers.
The Mortgage Choice 2011 recent first-home owner survey found that the majority of first-home buyers (55%) were aged between 18 and 29, this itself a fall from a 2010 survey when 63% of respondents were in this age bracket.
The 2011 survey also found that 34% of recent first-home buyers were aged between 30 and 39, and only 11% were aged 40 and over.
Mortgage Choice spokesperson Belinda Williamson says the results of the survey show that “more first-home buyers are saving for longer and purchasing later in life, perhaps when they are in a better financial position”.
Other findings of the 2012 survey tie in with the shift towards older first-home buyers, with the average period to save for a deposit increasing from 1.8 years in the 2011 survey to two years in 2012.
It also found that job security concerns have increased notably since 2011, with 18% of 2012 respondents claiming it to be their biggest concern, compared with 11% last year.
Conversely, fewer buyers are concerned about rising house prices (22% this year compared with 31% in 2011) and even fewer are concerned about the impact of interest rates on their ability to purchase their first home (8% this year compared with 14% in 2011).
“While many of the economic indicators such as rate cuts, lower house prices and improved affordability might suggest now is a good time to buy, people are still nervous about their ability to sustain employment,” says Williamson.
</body></html>

First-home buyers increasingly ageing into their 30s and one in five even aged 40 and over: Mortgage Choice 

<html><body>
While it’s still early days, the latest housing finance figures published by both the ABS and mortgage broker AFG suggest NSW and Queensland are discouraging many first-home buyers after doubling state handouts last year, but only if they buy or build a new home, while offering nothing for those that buy an existing property.
The most up-to-date mortgage figures are provided by aggregator AFG, which claims to write one in every 10 home loans in Australia through its network of affiliated mortgage brokers.
AFG reports a healthy 15% rise in the volume of mortgages arranged by brokers over 2012 from $28 billion to $32 billion, but says the average long term share of home loans arranged for first-home buyers, usually between 12% and 15%, collapsed to just 4.2% in NSW and 4.5% in Queensland during the last two months of 2012, after the $7,000 first-home buyers grants were withdrawn in both states in favour of the $15,000 boost for new homes only.
In comparison, investors dominated the mortgage market in these two states, comprising 46.3% and 35.9% of all home loans respectively.
Official ABS data is only up until November, so it is difficult to say a trend is emerging, but the figures certainly suggest first-home buyers have not been swayed to consider a new house or apartment over an existing property.
The ABS records that the number of first-home buyer loans arranged in NSW fell from 2,088 in October to 1,383 November, while in Queensland first-home buyer loan numbers fell from 2,116 in October to 1,417 in November - in both states a monthly drop of 33%.
Furthermore, just 793 first-home buyers took advantage of the revised NSW first-home owners' grant in December last year, <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/news/nsw-first-home-buyer-numbers-fell-to-20-year-lows-in-late-2012/2013011458763?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=news">the lowest take-up in 20 years</a> with the NSW state opposition claiming that Barry O'Farrell's decision to dump first-home buyer grants and stamp duty exemptions have been "nothing short of devastating for young people trying to buy their first home".
Indeed, first-home buyer changes are particularly tough on those in NSW that wish to buy an existing property.
Since October 1, the NSW state grant has been lifted from $7,000 to $15,000 for new homes valued up to $650,000, while a maximum stamp duty exemption of $20,240 is also available for new homes worth up to $550,000.<a style="font-size: 0.8em;" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/administrator/index.php?option=com_flexicontent&amp;view=item&amp;cid=58777#">Apply</a>
First-home buyers that purchase an existing home get nothing.
In Queensland, since September 11, a $15,000 first-home owner construction grant (FHOCG) has been available for new property bought or built at a value under $750,000, but all first-home buyers also pay no duty on purchases up to $500,000, with a phasing-out rebate applicable for values up to $600,000.
The doubling of the NSW first-home buyer grant was announced in mid-June, but only came into effect three-and-half months later, with Property Observer reporting on the conundrum it created for both <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/residential/nsw-budgets-needlessly-complex-artificial-deadlines-have-short-term-and-long-term-consequences-for-residential-property/2012061455119">first-home buyers and investors</a> over this interim period.
Queensland government introduced its construction grant with immediate effect from September 11, but gave first-home buyers up until October 11 to finalise contracts.
Contrast this with Victoria, which still offers a $7,000 first-home buyer loan for both new and existing home purchases (and increased stamp duty concessions from 20% to 30% on January 1) and first-home buyer loan numbers were little changed over the month, falling marginally from 2,545 to 2,407.
Ray White chairman Brian White labelled the new first-home buyer polices as “no longer a first-home buyers but a builders incentive” and a "deceit", saying they distorted the market, but not in a healthy way.
The latest data suggests he could be right.
</body></html>

First-home buyer policies failing in NSW and Queensland

<html><body>
The ATO is warning investors about a tax avoidance scheme where they are encouraged to borrow funds to invest in a trust that buys a rental property and are then told they can claim the borrowings as a tax deduction.
In such a scheme a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) derives income through a direct or indirect interest in the trust.
“In this arrangement a promoter encourages you to borrow funds to invest in a trust which has, as one of its beneficiaries, an SMSF. The trust uses the funds to buy a rental property.
“You then claim all of the borrowing costs as income tax deductions. However, some of the income from the investment is distributed to the SMSF.
“This arrangement is considered to be a scheme because you are claiming deductions for all of the interest expenses on the borrowing but the borrowing has also been used to derive income for other beneficiaries of the trust such as an SMSF which is ordinarily taxed at the concessional rate.
“However, as the income distribution from the trust to the SMSF may be considered non arm's-length income, it may in fact be taxable at a higher rate,” says the ATO.
The ATO provides a more detailed explanation of this scheme in a <a target="_blank" href="https://law.ato.gov.au/atolaw/view.htm?Docid=TPA/TA20084/NAT/ATO/00001&amp;PiT=99991231235958">2008 taxpayer alert.</a>
The warning is part of a new guide issued by the ATO called Investigating tax-effective arrangements, which aims to help borrowers “recognise some of the common types of tax avoidance schemes so you can reject them and avoid the negative consequences associated with them”.
The ATO is also warning on two <a target="_blank" href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/tax/ato-warns-on-home-loan-tax-avoidance-schemes/2013012458979?utm_source=po&amp;utm_medium=aida&amp;utm_campaign=news">home loan tax avoidance schemes</a>.
The guide can be <a href="https://www.ato.gov.au/atp/content.aspx?menuid=0&amp;doc=/content/00268505.htm&amp;page=1&amp;H1">viewed online</a> or <a href="https://www.ato.gov.au/atp/content.aspx?menuid=0&amp;doc=/content/00268505.htm&amp;page=1&amp;H1">downloaded as a PDF document</a>.
</body></html>

ATO warns investors about illegal SMSF rental property scheme

<html><body>
Mortgage lender RAMS has waived application fees and settlement fees for first-home buyers as part of a new campaign aimed at helping them move from renting to buying.
The campaign is being promoted by a new television commercial, which aired for the first time last weekend.
RAMS has also waived the account keeping fees on its RAMS Low Rate Home Loan with Introductory Rate Option, during the introductory rate period.
According to the lender, this could save first-home buyers up to $1,590 in fees.
“We understand the frustrations of FHBs who tell us they are in a rental rut and are delaying purchasing a property due to their inability to afford repayments and fears of unemployment in an uncertain economy," says RAMS chief executive Melos Sulicich.
“We have listened to their concerns and created genuine options designed to renew first-home buyer confidence and reignite their passion and drive to take the first step to home ownership."
RAMS says it is also helping first-home buyers by requiring only a 5% deposit with a full-doc loan (plus funds to cover transaction costs), if they meet our other lending criteria.
The lender has also cut its two-year fixed rate from 5.39% to 5.25%.
</body></html>

RAMS waives fees for first-home buyers

<html><body>
After your spot of shopping on Collins Street, why not pop into the Bank of Melbourne branch at the Paris end for a free valuation of your investment property or a quick read of the latest investment tips from Alan Kohler or Robert Gottliebsen? Or even just sit back and watch Sky Business for a while?
Just don’t expect either of these two economic gurus to be standing around answering personal investment questions when you step into the recently opened 'Investore' at the Bank of Melbourne branch at 233 Collins Street.
<img src="/images/stories/2013/02/investore1.jpg" width="470" height="583" alt="investore1">
Despite the store beckoning you to enter with a collage poster featuring a slice of Alan Kohler's face alongside that of Robert Gottliebsen's, they won't actually be there. 
They will seemingly limit their involvement in the venture to providing half of their faces to the promotional material and allowing visitors to read their investment tips for free.
It’s a rather unusual venture with a Fairfax brand, Domain, sitting alongside a News Limited one, The Eureka Report.
The Investore, as explained by an onsite Bank of Melbourne employee, is not a pop-up shop but a permanent investment lounge with computers and rows of iPads where visitors can obtain free property reports provided by Domain's Australian Property Monitors and read unlocked stories and reports on the Eureka website from Kohler, Gottliebsen and other investment writers.
<img src="/images/stories/2013/02/investore2.jpg" width="470" height="283" alt="investore2">
It’s all part of efforts by the Bank of Melbourne to add extra value to its customers and build the brand and, one imagines, take on the likes of Bankwest, which was the first to pioneer the idea of a funky bank branch offering free coffee, the chance to buy property investment books and this writer's personal favourite, the coin counter.
Certainly, Bank of Melbourne been trying to separate itself (in the minds of customers) from its big four bank parent Westpac, with signs in Bank of Melbourne windows promising lower mortgage rates than the big four banks.
In addition to the free property reports and a browse of the Eureka website, there’s also the chance to sign up for free property and investment seminars presented by Business Spectator editor James Kirby and Consumer Affairs Victoria.
</body></html>

Bank of Melbourne offers free property reports and investment tips but don’t expect a chat with Alan Kohler

<html><body>
Self-managed super fund investors are showing an increasing appetite for adding commercial real estate and residential property into their portfolios.
Figures compiled by the Australian Tax Office (ATO) show that from 2008 to 2012, commercial property investments by SMSFs increased by 77% while residential investments increased by 56%.
In total, real estate assets make about around 15% of SMSF portfolios, compared with 8% for the rest of superannuation industry.
SMSF investment in direct property 2008 – 2-12
<table style="width: 470px;" border="1" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="154">
 
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
Dec 2008
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
Dec 2012
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="154">
Commercial property
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
$30.7 billion
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
$54.3 billion
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top" width="154">
Residential property
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
$10.6 billion
</td>
<td valign="top" width="154">
$16.7 billion
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Source: ATO
This appetite for property comes with its risks, not all of which relate to the unpredictability of the property market.
According to superannuation expert Peter Nicol, there are three issues relating to high exposure to direct property: yield, liquidity and the indivisibility of property.
Nicol, a principal with the Perth superannuation division of accountants RSM Bird Cameron, says the issue of yield relates to the minimum pensions required to be drawn from the fund.
If an investment property fails to deliver the yield required and the SMSF members are in their pension phase (65 or older) they face the problem of “addressing the liquidity issue of the fund for pension payments and meeting compliance requirements”.
This, Nicol says, may require the fund to liquidate assets.
“Property is not noted as being an easily liquidated asset: in some cases it can take months to sell a property and realise the cash for payments,” says Nicol in an article written for the Australian Financial Review.
“Where a pension member is reliant on that regular monthly income for lifestyle, the illiquid nature of the asset can create serious issues and could result in a property being sold on less than optimal terms,” he says.
And the issue of liquidity is a problem because of the indivisibility of property compared with other more liquid investments such as cash, shares or bonds.
“In most cases direct property can’t be sold in pieces to provide the needed liquidity to meet pension payments. This means where cash is short in the fund to meet pension payments of the pension member who is in need of a lump sum to meet medical bills, holidays or for special occasions, there isn’t the ability to partially redeem a direct property,” he says.
However, he says there are options to address these issues including that SMSF members keep the property, if it is being used for some specific purpose such as it is used in the family business or it is to be handed to the next generation
“The SMSF can keep the property effectively until the last member’s death,” says Nicol.
Readers can find more <a target="_blank" href="https://www.rsmi.com.au/services_/business_solutions/self_managed_superannuation_funds/superannuation_financial_review">SMSF advice and tips from Peter Nicol</a> via the RSM Bird Cameron website.
</body></html>

SMSFs' ever-growing desire for property investments creating potential liquidity headaches

<html><body>
Plummeting first-home buyer numbers have raised fresh questions about recently introduced first-home buyer grant schemes on offer in NSW as well as raise issues about current housing affordability. 
The number of loans to first-home buyers in December 2012 fell to 14.9% according to ABS figures, the fourth consecutive month that this segment of the market has declined.
This a 37% decline on figures from a year ago when first-home buyers accounted for more than one in five new home loans (21.1%).
This was the weakest proportion of first-home buyers in the housing market since June 2004 and just two percentage points off the record low of 12.8% in March 2004 for ABS figures going back to July 1991.
The decline suggests that the new first-home owner grants in Queensland and NSW, which provide generous handouts of $15,000 – but only for those who buy or build new homes – have missed the mark and are as claimed by the likes of Ray White chairman Brian White nothing more than a builder or developer incentive.
In addition they suggest housing remains unaffordable or undesirable for most prospective first-home buyers with low mortgage rates and a decline in capital city house prices over the last few years failing to spur this segment of the market in a meaningful way.
The fall was sharpest in NSW, where there was a 3.2% decline as well as a smaller 0.8% drop in Queensland and a 1.9% decline in WA. 
“The state detail was something of a surprise,” notes Westpac, who called the December figures “another weak reading” for first-home buyer activity. 
“We had expected unwinding first-home buyer demand in NSW (from an earlier bring-forward relating to state government changes) to have run its course by December with weakness to instead centre on Victoria where stamp duty concessions coming in from January 1 would have encouraged many FHBs to delay purchases. 
“Instead, the sharp slide in NSW continued (–3.2%) with Victoria posting a slight rise (+0.3% for the month). 
Westpac estimates that approvals in this segment were down another 5.7% in December on a seasonally- adjusted basis.  
First-home buyer numbers peaked in May 2009 following of the doubling of the first-home owners grant to $14,000 for those buying existing homes and trebling it to $21,000 for those buy newly built homes in October 2008. 
First home buyers as percentage of home lending dating back to 1991 (ABS)
 
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" width="415"><tbody>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Month
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Number of FHB loans
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
% of new loans
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Size of loan ($)
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1991
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
5654
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
20.7
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
71.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1992
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7733
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
76.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1993
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10139
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
83.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1994
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7789
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
90.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1995
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7218
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
89.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1996
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8427
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
23.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
99.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1997
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8047
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
104.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1998
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8651
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
120.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-1999
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10264
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
134.7
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2000
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9654
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
22.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
123.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2001
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
12745
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
25.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
146.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2002
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7998
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
15.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
160.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2003
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7618
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
13.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
185.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Mar-2004*
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7083
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
12.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
191.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jun-2004**
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7428
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
204.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2004
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8845
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
16.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
210.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2005
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10811
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
217.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2006
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10241
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
228.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2007
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
11282
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
230.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2008
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14142
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
27.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
271.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
May 2009***
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18744
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
31.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
279.4
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2009
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
11793
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
23.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
293.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2010
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8199
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
289.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2011
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
10264
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
21.1
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
285.1
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jan-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8043
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
20.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
282.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Feb-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7360
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.4
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
279.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Mar-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7902
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
16.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
281.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Apr-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7077
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
17.0
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
282.5
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
May-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9110
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.1
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.3
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jun-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8415
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.5
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
292.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Jul-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8760
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.2
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
291.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Aug-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8921
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.6
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.9
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Sep-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
8391
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
19.3
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
289.2
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Oct-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
9215
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
18.7
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
288.0
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Nov-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
7921
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
15.8
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
287.8
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
Dec-2012
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
6557
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
14.9
</td>
<td nowrap valign="bottom" width="104">
293.9
</td>
</tr>
</tbody></table>
Source: ABS
*Record lowest proportion of first-home buyers
**Previous lowest proportion of first homebuyers after December 2012
***Highest proportion of first-home buyers
</body></html>

First-home buyers at lowest share of new home loans in more than eight years: historical data to 1991

<html><body>
More evidence has emerged of the damaging impact that changes to first-home buyer grants in NSW and Queensland are having on home buyer sentiment.
First-home buyer (FHB) sentiment fell 12.8% according to the latest <a href="/property-observer" target="_blank">Genworth</a> Homebuyer Confidence Index, driving a 5.1% fall in the overall index – its lowest level since 2008.
The bi-annual index, a measure of home buyer and would-be home buyer sentiment, fell from 98.4 to 93.4 over the six-month period while the first-home buyer sub-index fell from 98.5 to 85.9.
Click to enlarge
<a href="/images/stories/2013/03/genworthmarch27one.gif" rel="shadowbox" title="Click to enlarge"><img src="/images/stories/2013/03/genworthmarch27onethumb.gif"></a>
“Changes to incentives in New South Wales and Queensland states may be affecting FHB con?dence more broadly, with New South Wales having the lowest proportion of prospective FHBs who thought now was a good time to buy a home,” the report says.
“New South Wales and Queensland both saw a large fall in the number of FHBs in the market, according to ABS data, of 56% and 66% respectively between September 2012 and January 2013.”
In addition, mortgage stress among FHBs is rising with the report finding that 41% of recent first-home buyers are expecting difficulty with mortgage repayments over the coming year – up from 18% in September 2012. 
The fall in the overall index was primarily driven by a 42% increase in the proportion of borrowers who expect to experience mortgage stress over the next 12 months rising from 18% in September 2012 to 27% in March 2013.
“The sharp rise in the proportion of surveyed FHBs experiencing and anticipating hardship follows the removal of FHB incentives on established dwellings in New SouthWales and Queensland, which went into effect in October 2012.
“Amongst FHBs in Queensland, over-commitment/borrowing was cited as the main reason for expecting mortgage stress," says the report.
Bridget Sakr, chief commercial officer of Genworth, says the changes to government grants led to a bigger drop in first-home buyer confidence compared with the overall decline in the index.
The changes to the FHB grants impacted on the ability of FHBs to purchase the properties they want, Sakr told Property Observer.
She highlighted the findings of the report that fewer than one in four FHBs wanted to buy a new home.
Despite this sharp fall in FHB confidence, time to buy a home sentiment is still higher than it was a year ago, though it too fell from 54% of FHBs to 49% as of March 2013.
“FHBs still aspire to own a home, this has increased from last year, but most want an established home in an area they want to live,” Sakr says.
“The grant removals have hindered them from being able to do that.”
</body></html>

Larry Schlesinger

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News