<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
The approval by the NSW Government of a new tower over the future Martin Place metro station is a good balanced solution.
It is important that the NSW Government works with the private sector in rolling out new metro rail lines and stations and the proposal for the Martin Place station is an excellent example of this.
The final setback above a podium of 8 metres maintains the character of Martin Place while allowing a commercial tower to be built over the podium but set back by 8 metres.
The City of Sydney have raised concerns that a set-back of 25 metres would have been preferable but their comments do not take into account that the adjacent MLC Centre tower is set back far more than this.
The proposed tower is well away from the Cenotaph down the far end of Martin Place and is more contextually related to the Reserve Bank building at the top of Martin Place.
As Sydney evolves into a global city with a population of 8 million people there will need to be a balance between maintaining the built form of the past and shaping the city of the future.
It is good that robust discussion occurs as new proposals are made but ultimately the city must change and evolve.
The government’s decision on the unsolicited proposal for Martin Place Station and related new buildings represents a good balance between the past and the future.
The use of the NSW Government Architect Peter Poulet, who strongly supported the 8 metre setback, in achieving this balance is also a good process to ensure quality change occurs in the city.
CHRIS JOHNSON is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

cjohnson-8xfqfuuCSq

Martin Place tower a good balanced solution for Sydney: Urban Taskforce

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
The record number of completions of 40,009 new homes in the year to February 2018 is good news for housing supply with strong population growth.
The 40,009 housing completions are above the required 20 year average of 36,250 per year which is good news.
The approvals for these homes came a few years ago at the peak of the housing boom and it is good to see that the combination of government policies and the hard work of the development industry is paying off.
The big change from earlier years on housing production has been the rise in the proportion of new homes that are apartments which are close to 70% of the total.
A decade ago detached houses and apartments were approved at similar numbers but now apartments and multi-unit dwellings are in the majority.
Changes to the planning system have also helped with the establishment of planning panels for large projects and the increase in complying development approval streams.
Most apartment projects are larger scale projects so the role of planning panels in assessing these will continue to be important.
While the housing completions have reached record levels the approvals are dropping.
In February 2017 there were 58,774 approvals compared to the 51,994 housing approvals in February 2018. This is an 11.5% drop and it appears that this will go down further.
Clearly the housing development industry will go through peaks and troughs but it is important that government policies continue to support both strong approvals and strong completions and do not add additional cost to development or add red tape.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the NSW Government to ensure a consistent flow of new homes for Sydney.
CHRIS JOHNSON is the Urban Taskforce CEO.
</body></html>

Sydney's record home completions is good news: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
Sydney councils are requiring an excessive number of specialist reports to submit a development application (DA) for a simple house.
The Urban Taskforce has undertaken a review of the number of reports required by Sydney councils for the lodgement of a DA for a simple house and we have found an amazing number of reports required.
Bayside Council requires 27 reports, Liverpool City Council requires 26 and Willoughby requires 23 reports just for a simple house. If a residential flat building is proposed the DA requirements escalate with the Northern Beaches Council requiring 49 reports. Each council issues a check list that lists the growing number of detailed reports required. Clearly this is getting out of control.”
Recent NSW Government initiatives to increase the number of projects that are assessed under Complying Development rules are excellent moves to a simpler planning system that have been announced by NSW Planning Minister Anthony Roberts.
The Greenfield Housing Code and the Missing Middle Code bye-pass most of the excessive number of reports required for Merit Assessed projects and this system should be expanded to larger scale projects.
Reports now required by Sydney councils for lodging a residential DA include Access Report, Acid Sulfate Soils Report, Air Quality Report, Asbestos Management Plan, Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan, Contamination Assessment, Crime Risk assessment Report, Flora and Fora Assessment, Hazardous Materials Survey, Heritage Impact Statement, Noise Impact Analysis, Reflectivity Report, Security Management Plan, Tree Management Plan, Water Cycle Management Plan and many others.
Despite the introduction of the Greenfield Housing Code the NSW Government still sets requirements for multiple reports for merit assessment for a house that does not fit the code rules in the Box Hill Growth
Centre Precincts Development Control Plan that will be assessed by the Hills Shire Council requiring or may require 23 reports for a simple dwelling house DA. The reports include a Construction Noise and Vibration Management Plan, Contamination Assessment, Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan, Statement of Environmental Effects, Shadow Diagrams and possibly a Heritage Impact Statement, Noise Impact Analysis, Preliminary Engineering Drainage Plans.
Liverpool City Council require for a single dwelling house a Statement of Environmental Effects, Waste Management Plan, Sediment Control Plan and potentially a Traffic Report, Arborist Report, Archaeological Assessment, Salinity Management Response and Odour Assessment.
Canterbury Bankstown require a Neighbour Notification Plan for a DA for a single house. Willoughby City Council require for all DAs an Arborist Report, Acoustic Report, Archaeological Assessment Report, Demolition Report, Erosion/ Sediment Control Plan, Shadow Diagrams, Site and Context Analysis, Traffic and Parking Assessment and a Waste Management Plan.
The Urban Taskforce research found that there were 81 separate reports required for a residential DA across all of the Sydney councils and this did not include a number of other reports required for non- residential DAs.
Clearly a number of these reports are necessary to assess the Development Application for a single house but over recent years the number of specialist reports seems to have grown dramatically. Each of these reports costs the applicant a significant amount of money which just increases the cost of housing in Sydney.
It looks like council planners are very risk adverse and want expert reports on multiple areas that they can use to justify their decisions. The Urban Taskforce believes the requirements for a simple house DA have got out of control and that the NSW Government needs to review this by applying similar approaches to those contained in the complying codes. A whole industry of consultants has grown up around the requirement for expert reports and no doubt this group will encourage the need for even more reports. A balance is required in terms of a Report Impact Statement on Housing Costs to ensure the assessment process has not become too complex.
See below the schedule of reports required by 21 Sydney councils and the list of the 81 reports required for a residential DA in Sydney.
Click here <a href="https://www.propertyobserver.com.au/images/2018/4/23/taskforce.jpg" target="_blank">to enlarge.</a>
<img src="https://res.cloudinary.com/dz9xllyip/image/fetch/c_scale,w_580,q_auto:good/https://s3-ap-southeast-2.amazonaws.com/po.images/2018/4/23/taskforce.jpg" alt="">
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</body></html>

27 is too many! Reports required for a DA in Sydney is excessive: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVATION
Despite a pre-election anti-development environment in Sydney there are many quality examples of urban renewal with-in Sydney as well as Singapore, London and New York. Local politicians should learn from these projects.
The Creating Communities Conference attended by over 300 people last Friday demonstrated many examples of how to create quality development that give a positive rebuttal to the anti-development rhetoric that is occurring in the lead up to next year's NSW election.
It was very timely to see so many excellent urban developments from around the world to remind us in Sydney that growth and new developments can add excitement and positive new places for communities to live, work and relax.
Gordon Adams, the Head of Planning at the Battersea Power Station Development Company, explained the importance of political leadership to drive this massive urban renewal project in London. The projects size was large enough to get the London Underground's Northern Line extended to the site and this has generated a ripple effect of urban renewal in the surrounding areas.
Ultimately Battersea (pictured above) will have 3,500 apartments, 15,000 jobs including the biggest Apple office in the UK, parks, child care, restaurants and community facilities.
The combination on metro rail, a centre for jobs and a large number of new homes has created a new city within a city.
Marianne Kwok, Design Director, Kohn Pedersen Fox in New York was the key master planner for that cities major urban renewal project at Hudson Yards over underused railway yards. A new station was added to the New York subway and the famous elevated pedestrian network of the High Line weaves through the site and the buildings.
<img src="https://www.urban.com.au/images/2018/10/17/Hudson.JPG" alt="">
Hudson Yards (pictured above) will have 4,000 new homes, 1 million square feet of office space, three new parks, child care, shops and restaurants and some amazing public art works.
Rahul Mittal, Director Design, Cistri Singapore gave a detailed overview of how similar Singapore was to Sydney in population terms but that Singapore was much denser but still very liveable.
He positioned Singapore as an example of how the balancing of new development with an extensive metro rail network and a strong greening policy can lead to positive results.
The mood at the Creating Communities Conference was very upbeat about how quality new development can add value to the residents and workers in new precincts and how a level of excitement can occur with new stimulating developments.
A number of emerging Sydney urban renewal projects were presented that matched the quality of the international examples.
Dominic Sullivan outlined the rationale behind PAYCE's Melrose Park proposed development, Neil Arckless from Lendlease presented the mixed use precinct of Darling Square. Sasha Kovic and Scott Clohessy from Frasers Property outlined the concept behind the Ivanhoe project that will house social, affordable and market housing as well as a new school and parklands.
The greenfield housing development at Willowdale was presented by Stockland's Sophie Pickett-Heaps along with Stockland's focus on building communities. Toga's Fabrizio Perilli gave an excellent outline of his Surry Hills Village project that carried the laneway culture of the suburb into this new development.
With a multitude of quality urban renewal projects presented from different world cities and from different parts of Sydney there is no doubt that the development industry is making a very positive contribution to the future of urban living.
The current negative debate about over development in Sydney needs to be balanced by the very positive examples of how other cities have passed through this growth phase and by the emerging examples of quality development across Sydney.
The Urban Taskforce calls on all politicians in the lead up to the NSW election next March to take a positive approach to quality new development rather than encouraging the fear of change in their electorates that will create an ant-development attitude to garner short term votes.
Sydney needs politicians that are committed to the long term future of Sydney for future generations. 
Chris Johnson is the Urban Taskforce CEO
</body></html>

Political leaders must learn from quality urban renewal projects: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The latest data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics indicates a sharp drop in apartment approvals in NSW and Victoria.
The overall housing approval figures are falling in NSW and Victoria with the major falls being in the apartment market.
House approvals in NSW have dropped from 2,504 based on trends in March 2018 to 2,336 in August 2018 while house approvals in the smaller state of Victoria were more robust at 3,174 in August 2018.
It is the apartment market where approvals are falling fastest with NSW having 3,764 in September 2017 but this has fallen to 3,041 in August 2018. The Victorian apartment approvals have fallen even further from a high of 3,542 in December 2017 to less than half of this in August 2018 at 1,642 approvals.
It appears that confidence in the apartment market in both Melbourne and Sydney is slowing rapidly with many developers indicating that presales are much less than a year ago.
The Urban Taskforce urges governments to develop policies that support new housing supply as population growth targets have not changed. The pre- election environment in NSW has led to back downs on a number of planning policies including the ‘Missing Middle’ code, the Sydenham to Bankstown Planned Precincts and planning proposals in Ryde.
The concerns by some community groups about the extent of new development in Sydney seems to have led to a move away from housing supply targets and this is lowering confidence in the development industry.
Chris Johnson is the Urban Taskforce CEO
</body></html>

NSW and Victorian apartment approvals falling fast: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
EXPERT OBSERVER
The NSW Government must appoint a new Government Architect to replace Peter Poulet (Pictured above).
The recent move of the current NSW Government Architect, Peter Poulet, to a reduced role in the Greater Sydney Commission leaves a vacant leadership role for design in the NSW Government.
For 200 years NSW has led Australia in having a champion for the design of the built environment with a state architect.
The current Government Architect has successfully managed the transition of the role from one of designing buildings to one of setting the framework for the quality of buildings and their urban setting.
Peter Poulet has set policies and produced guides and systems that champion design quality at a time when the community has raised concerns about increasing density in urban areas.
He has also chaired the Urban Taskforce Development Excellence Awards jury and demonstrated a willingness to work with the industry.
We thank Peter for his contribution the New South Wales.
The Urban Taskforce is concerned that there seem to be a number of senior executives leaving the Department of Planning and Environment at a crucial time in the growth of the state’s cities.
The development industry needs stability and strong leadership in planning particularly with the current down turn in home prices and in housing approval numbers.
The recent government back downs on key policies related to town houses, planning policies in Ryde and on the planned precincts on the Sydenham to Bankstown line also indicate a softening in support for development.
There are clearly important roles in the Central District of Greater Sydney but there are also opportunities for someone of Peter Poulet’s experience to develop design quality across Greater Sydney generally and the Urban Taskforce would support this.
The Urban Taskforce encourages the NSW Government to ensure that the tradition of the NSW Government Architect continues particularly as an advocate for the quality design of greater urban density as populations increase.
Chris Johnson is the CEO of the Urban Taskforce
</body></html>

NSW Government Architect role important for the state’s urbanisation: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
The three shortlisted designs for an iconic tower for Crown Resorts at Barangaroo demonstrate a new approach to the design of tall towers.
<a target="_blank" href="/property-observer">The three designs</a> demonstrate architecture of flowing shapes that imply movement as opposed to older static tower forms.
The three architects have incredible global track records in designing tall buildings. Clearly each team can deliver a quality final product.
With my background as the NSW Government Architect for 10 years it is hard to resist giving some preferences even based on early information.
The proposal by Adrian Smith and Gordon Gill is a fraction ahead in my assessment with its dynamic shape and its approach to the ground plane. These architects have designed some of the world’s tallest buildings from the beautiful Jin Mao tower in Shanghai, the Burj Khalifa in Dubai to the Kingdom Tower in Jeddah at 1000 metres and more recently their design for the 119 floor Greenland Centre in Wuhan in China.
Following close behind is the design by Wilkinson Eyre with a series of interwoven curves that emphasise the vertical form. This firm has designed the elegant Guangzhou International Finance Centre which has a flowing cigar shape to the 103 storey tower with a triangular atrium through the upper levels.
Kohn Pedersen Fox have another flowing design with some midrise wings. Their impressive 118 storey International Commerce Centre in Hong Kong demonstrates the quality of their architecture and how an iconic building on the waterfront can add value to the city.
The three designs carry the spirit of the original design for a hotel in the water onto the land.
These new designs add the spark that the hotel in the water provided back into the overall design.
Clearly there will be more refinement of the designs and a planning approval process that will assess the winning proposal in detail but Sydney looks like is getting a world class sculptural building that demonstrates our confidence as a global city.
Chris Johnson is chief executive of <a href="https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&amp;rct=j&amp;q=&amp;esrc=s&amp;source=web&amp;cd=1&amp;cad=rja&amp;ved=0CDEQFjAA&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.urbantaskforce.com.au%2F&amp;ei=5U-DUbOcCcuuiQe6iICwAQ&amp;usg=AFQjCNFJI_DBNm6steAkrA2IciAdrnpiPQ&amp;bvm=bv.45960087,d.aGc" target="_blank">Urban Taskforce</a>.
</body></html>

Three Barangaroo Hotel designs show Sydney will get a world class sculptural building: Chris Johnson

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
Developers who are councillors should not be allowed to vote on any planning instrument that they could benefit from. 
It is important that the approval of planning changes that could affect property values are not undertaken by councillors who could be perceived to gain from those changes. This means that any councillor with a pecuniary interest in a property in the local government area should not vote on development applications or on the rezoning of precincts affecting that property.
If a councillor is involved in development, or owns land that could change in value, or could gain an increase in their own land value by opposing more housing supply, then that councillor should not be able to vote on any change to the planning rules.
The Urban Taskforce believes that it is preferable that full time developers do not become councillors as they will be perceived to be involved in increasing the value of land they may own.
There should also be stronger controls on the role of councillors elected to council on an anti-growth platform as they are clearly concerned to maximise the value of existing properties by stopping more supply. Their pecuniary interest is less direct but it would be best for them to not vote on development applications or rezoning of precincts.
If all those who are conflicted on planning issues are excluded from voting it is likely that a quorum of voters may not be achieved. The answer should be to move to a fully independent process of approval of planning issues by Independent Hearing and Assessment Panels (IHAPs) or for the proposed Greater Sydney Commission to take over this role. IHAPS are used successfully in many areas and would negate any real or perceived conflict of interest and result in a clear, transparent decision making process. 
It will be better for Metropolitan Sydney to move planning away from the competing interests of factions in local government to an independent process run by experts.
 
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Councillors should not vote on plans they can benefit from: Urban Taskforce

<html><body><div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
GUEST OBSERVER
The Draft Legislation for the Greater Sydney Commission gives the commission the power to make Local Environmental Plans and District Plans. 
The powers proposed for the Greater Sydney Commission give it a major role in determining Sydney’s future. The Sydney Planning Panels will be determining development applications over $20 million and the Commission will have the authority to make Local Environmental Plans (LEPs). The Draft legislation even precludes the Minister from making LEPs thereby ensuring that the independent commission has significant power.
The ultimate signal of the Greater Sydney Commission’s power will be demonstrated by the quality of the appointments to the commissioner positions. It will be important that the commissioners understand the planning system and that they are able to advocate for sensible growth in appropriate areas in metropolitan Sydney.
The principal objectives of the Commission stress the role of planning, aligning infrastructure with planning and promoting housing supply but do not mention jobs. One of the major priorities of the GSC will be to manage the location of jobs closer to where people live.
One important role that is missing from the proposed legislation is that of co-ordinating government agencies on development application referrals. Currently many development applications in metropolitan Sydney are delayed for many months by referrals to many government agencies. Referrals to roads or rail agencies as well as to water and electricity agencies are slowing the approval process down.
In Queensland a one stop agency, the State Assessment and Referral Authority (SARA), resolves all state government referrals within tight timeframes. NSW must adopt a similar system and the Greater Sydney Commission should lead in driving reform in this area.
The Urban Taskforce is keen to work with the Greater Sydney Commission in its important tasks. While local communities are represented by the six District Commissioners, the involvement of the risk taking development and investment sector does not seem to be part of the structure.
It will be essential for the Greater Sydney Commission to listen to the private sector investors in new property to ensure that they are encouraged to create the new housing and job development Sydney needs as growth continues.
 
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>

Greater Sydney Commission Legislation gives real planning power: Chris Johnson

<html><body>
GUEST OBSERVER
<div class="page" title="Page 1">
<div class="layoutArea">
<div class="column">
The announcement by the NSW Government of plans for an extra 36,000 new apartments around 11 stations on the proposed Sydney Metro line supports the integration of transport and density. 
It is essential that housing densities are increased around new railway stations. The addition of 36,000 new apartments around the 11 stations on the proposed metro from Sydenham to Bankstown is a good beginning but over time more density may be needed.
The strategy indicates that high rise buildings should be located around a number of stations including Bankstown, Canterbury and Campsie but the documents indicate that ‘high rise’ is considered to be 9 stories and above. It is important that buildings up to 20 stories are located in the urban centres near railway stations and services, and that communities understand that this will occur.
The Sydenham to Bankstown Strategy delivers increased densities within 800 metres of each railway station. Clearly development will be determined by the feasibility of replacing existing buildings and if the uplift in density is insufficient then change will not occur. It will be important that the economic viability of redevelopment of existing town centres is tested with the private sector to ensure that the housing targets can be met. 
The strategy lists potential infrastructure upgrades and suggests that a contribution scheme from development will fund some of these projects. The extent of contribution will need to be carefully managed to ensure that projects are still viable.
The Government’s strategy for development and urban renewal around the 11 stations along the Sydenham to Bankstown Metro line must be implemented through a strong planning framework. Rezoning of land around stations must be undertaken efficiently and within a reasonable amount of time. 
The Government must not allow individual councils to water down the development potential. After all it is the State Government that is delivering and investing in the new Metro line and this form of rapid transit needs significant development close to stations to maximise the effectiveness of the public transport system.
Chris Johnson is chief executive officer of property development industry group Urban Taskforce and can be contacted <a href="https://www.urbantaskforce.com.au/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=97&amp;Itemid=126#.Vdaart55dFI" target="_blank">here</a>.
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body></html>

Chris Johnson

Editor's Picks

Have something to contribute?

Developments

New apartments

New townhouses

News